Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

The Other Ron Paul

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (7 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Libertarians believe that if business is bogged down with regulations, it cuts into profits and makes it difficult to provide decent paying jobs to Americans. They'll tell you this is why corporations are outsourcing their work.

They don't say much about the CEO's pay cutting into profits. They have spoken about it on The Thom Hartmann Show, though, and have said that, in the grand scheme of things, the CEO's pay doesn't cut into the profits at all. They'll prove this by telling you how large the profits are, showing you just how small of a percentage of those huge profits the CEO's multimillion dollar compensation really is.

If you're sharp, you'll see the irony in the argument. If a multimillion dollar salary doesn't make a dent in a corporation's profits, why does that corporation feel the need to outsource its production work to places who pay their employees $1.00/hour?

The Libertarians' ultimate solution to this business/labor dilemma is to keep government out of the regulation business and allow corporations to regulate themselves. This is what Ron Paul believes, although he doesn't write much about labor on his web site.

I've worked for a multinational Fortune 500 corporation and in an article published at OpEdNews entitled "Shock Over Richards's Rant is Curious", I give an excellent example of just how well large corporations would do if allowed to self-regulate.

OpEdNews promotes itself as a site for "Tough Liberal, Progressive News and Opinion", although there have been many conservatives who have offered thoughtful commentary on articles published at OpEdNews. I imagine if there was an exceptional, factually based article written by a moderately conservative writer, OpEdNews may publish it.

However, make no mistake about it. Notwithstanding his passion to end the occupation of Iraq, Ron Paul is anything but a progressive. The man who appears to be a maverick Republican is not a maverick Republican. He's a libertarian who's too concerned with his personal success to register with The Libertarian Party, take his millions with him and run as a Libertarian.

The accolades that Paul is receiving from writers for a Progressive news outlet are very concerning.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You are wrong. Here's why. by Son of Publius on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 1:45:08 AM
to foofighter by Pat Herrick on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 1:46:35 PM
Have We Met? by Michael Bonanno on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 2:58:45 AM
Heh by gg on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 1:59:25 PM
Sick to death hearing about "Ron Paul" by John R Moffett on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 5:59:58 AM
I think by Mark Sashine on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 9:12:12 AM
Re: I think by gg on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 2:12:33 PM
Respectfully by Mark Sashine on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 8:46:30 AM
You're deflecting. by Son of Publius on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 8:28:59 PM
Can We Debate Like Progressives? by Michael Bonanno on Sunday, May 20, 2007 at 9:41:49 PM
Just maybe... by Susan Nelsen on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 1:19:41 AM
foofighter by John R Moffett on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 5:11:17 AM
Agreed by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 11:12:14 AM
Not Quite... by John Proodian on Monday, May 21, 2007 at 11:04:03 PM