Home
Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
November 19, 2006 at 08:32:09

View Ratings | Rate It

Some Rights Just Have to be Surrendered

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Michael Bonanno (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

What's an "obscene" amount of money?

We've already removed those non person corporations from the picture, so that should help.

Really, though, who are we to dictate what an "obscene" amount of money is?

We're the people who are going to hire these candidates, so shouldn't we determine what their "compensation" will be? Paying someone or taking money from someone to have an edge over a competitor for the same job should be unacceptable to us, the employers, and that candidate should be rejected.


Like any good corporation, we should write a Standard Operating Procedure that defines "obscene". We're the employers. We have the right to do that. If we consider how much our favorite candidate can afford, maybe we can develop a standard. Maybe the money should originate from we, the people in the form of equally distributed public money. Yep, we give 'em some money and tell them to go play, but only for six months.

  • During the six month campaigns, one would think that the candidates would want to use the time to allow people to learn about them. However, some candidates may still be tempted to speak about non issues.

    Keeping this in mind, the candidates will surrender their right to address non-issues.

    These issues include non relevant attacks about their opponent's personal affairs - and you can take that any way you want.

    Candidates may only speak about what they would do to improve social conditions, economic conditions, all domestic and international situations, if appropriate for that particular political race.

    A candidate still maintains the right to explain how he or she differs from his or her opponent(s)' positions concerning issues relevant to the welfare of his or her constituents, whether they're local people or the entire citizenry of the country.

    We should have the right to force a candidate out of the race if she or he veers from political relevancy. In fact, veering from political relevancy is another good candidate for a standard operating procedure.

    There may be more rights that should be surrendered in order for the vast majority of us to keep our basic freedoms. In fact, please feel free to add your candidates for surrenderable freedoms.

    Next Page  1  |  2

     

    Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

    He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
     

    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
    and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

    Follow Me on Twitter

     

  • Book Recommendations for "Election Reform USA United"
    Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform (Brookings Series on Election Administration and Reform)

    $26.95
    Lowest New Price $9.50

    Number of pages: 238
    Publisher: Brookings Institution Press

    To Assure Pride and Confidence in the Electoral Process: Report of the National Commission on Federal Election Reform
    by Jimmy Carter

    $22.95
    Lowest New Price $2.52

    Number of pages: 358
    Publisher: Brookings Institution Press

    Campaign and Election Reform (Contemporary World Issues)
    by Glenn H. Utter

    $55.00
    Lowest New Price $27.50

    Number of pages: 371
    Publisher: ABC-CLIO

    Campaign and Election Reform (Library in a Book)
    by Harry Henderson

    $45.00
    Lowest New Price $31.68

    Number of pages: 256
    Publisher: Facts on File

    View All Book Recommendations

    Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    4 comments
    To view all comments:
    Expand Comments
     

    You Are Completly Right by Timothy V. Gatto on Sunday, Nov 19, 2006 at 8:53:55 AM
    OK Michael turn in your membership card by ardee D. on Sunday, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:06:35 AM
    Partially right (or left) by Art Feierman on Monday, Nov 20, 2006 at 3:32:31 AM
    Their own interests? by ardee D. on Monday, Nov 20, 2006 at 7:17:24 AM

     
    Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


     

     

     

    Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

    Powered by Populum