Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
August 1, 2006 at 13:04:05

View Ratings | Rate It

The 9/11 Two Minute Study

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Michael Bonanno (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Fetzer made the statement within the two minutes during which Schultz gave the theory "a chance" that the nineteen hijackers could not have been taught enough about flying to have pulled off their dastardly deeds.

Schultz, a former pilot, said that was absurd. I'm not sure if Schultz piloted commercial airlines, jets during one or another war or Cessnas, but he was up in arms about Fetzer's statement. Schultz claims that, in just ten minutes, anyone could have been taught to do what the hijackers supposedly did. He then called those of us who believe that there's an alternative explanation "conspiracy nuts" and "crackpots".

A person called Schultz shortly after his tirade and asked about the maneuver that the pilot who hit the Pentagon had to make and Schultz said he knew nothing about that.

Schultz may very well be enabling a criminal. One may commit a crime, a vicious, unspeakable crime and, because of who one is, people say the person could never have been involved with the crime.


It would be nice if every criminal who is picked up by the police was let go because he or she said, "I'm (fill in the blank) and you know I wouldn't do anything like that" while throngs of people became so indignant that the criminal wasn't even charged, let alone put on trial.

Schultz finally said, "Listen, you believe what you want to believe and I'll believe what I want to believe."

OK, Ed. We'll believe what we believe based upon the many hours, days, weeks, months, in some cases years that we've been researching the events of September 11, 2001 and the anomalies we've seen that make the official version of what happened look like a very bad fairy tale.

And you can believe what you want to believe base upon you're "in depth" two minute study.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum