![]() |
|
|
September 3, 2007 at 08:05:27
'Microsoft 811' and Holt: "It's no longer my bill" by Mary Ann Gould Page 2 of 3 page(s) |
|
|
This bill is no longer the Holt bill...he said so himself. Clearly, the bill is now ‘Microsoft 811!’ ~ When Congressman Holt — the election reform leader in Congress — puts his trust in an audit that many experts say is inadequate, when he advocates for questionable paper trails linked to secretly programmed machines and then adds “ I don't care what Microsoft does with their electronics in there” (as he did), it begins to look like our elections are a game of Russian roulette.
~
Where once the bill called for complete openness, full public disclosure of all software used to count OUR votes, now we have the opposite. ‘Microsoft 811’ enshrines in LAW the right of corporations to privatize our election through control of programming secrecy, prohibiting public disclosure of what’s inside OUR voting machines! Only under strict conditions, people selected for very specific purposes can review the software, but only after signing non-disclosure agreements. Thus, what should be a contractual agreement is enshrined in federal law.
When you vote on Election Day you will not know what is happening inside that electronic machine. Under ‘Microsoft 811’, on Election Night the results reported will be generated from those secretly programmed electronic bytes….from the very machines that top security experts have labeled “fatally flawed.” Can we trust the results?
~
How will we know?
~
A few months ago in New York State, during the hectic closing days of the legislative session, Microsoft along with other software vendors/lobbyists tried to sneak through provisions to destroy some of the strictest, hardest won, voting security legislation in the country by attaching those provisions to another bill which was simply about a minor change in the primary. Fortunately, activists were vigilant and raised an alarm. Thousands of New Yorkers called their legislators in the next two days and the vendors’ effort was defeated. Citizens can win if they speak out.
Now we have a far bigger challenge. Microsoft and other software companies are trying to get another bill passed that would protect their rights over the rights of the public. It is up to We the People to say “No” … say it loud and clear till OUR VOICES – not the corporations’ – are heard and heeded.
~
There are more problems with ‘Microsoft 811’ than just the assault on the public’s right to know. See http://www.votersunite.org/info/hr811Report.pdf . Right now it must be stopped, and then we must demand that Congress pass a “stripped down” bill focused on the most vital steps to better secure election 2008. We MUST BAN DREs and provide states funding to replace them with systems that use paper ballots, marked by hand or by accessible ballot-marking devices, and counted by hand or by automatic tabulator. And any time we use computers to tabulate votes, we must have statistically significant hand-count audits to check the accuracy of the machines then continually improve the entire system. with citizen involvement.
~
People “say” Congress will never ban DREs. But where’s the proof? Congress’ reason for being is to serve “We the People.” It is up to all of us to act. So, call your Representative and engage at least ten other people to call or fax. Call until you are have been heard. Tell Representatives to vote NO on H.R. 811 and to insist on a real election reform bill that bans DREs and restores to our elections the requirement of true separate and independent checks and balances which can be open to the American people. Only our vote should be secret.
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Just Say No to HR 811! Choose people power over corporate power
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
www.voiceofthevoters.org
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 3 comments |
|
Microsoft 811
We would all be immensely better off with no Federal Bill at all. Any Federal bill should be two lines long: "Every election will be held on paper ballots which will be counted by hand in the precinct before the ballot box is moved. The count will be conducted in the manner used by the state of Maine." Maybe a third line. "One DRE will be in the precinct for the use of the disabled. No other voter will use it." And a forth: "The EAC is hereby abolished." Only then will he have honest elections again, and will be able to keep our fellow citizens from being murdered by these thugs who have usurped power. by GitarChris (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 142 comments) on Monday, Sep 3, 2007 at 1:20:22 PM
|
|
HR-811 would be the "hand-count" advocates' Best Friend
I agree that HR-811 isn't an airtight faulty electronic voting machine prevention bill. However, it wasn't designed to completely prevent bad tallies, only to audit them, and catch bad electronic equipment in the act through statistical quality control. Congress is so out of touch that they'd never entertain a hand-count bill short of serious public outcry. They are currently willing to entertain HR-811's audit, though, and that audit could easily set off a fire-storm of public awareness -- and thus the political will for paper-only hand-count ballots -- when these machines are proven to be the horribly faulty devices most of us think they are. HR-811 -- could just be a hand-count purist's best friend. by Mark-MyWords (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 10:00:53 PM
|
|
Reply: Voting machines and corporate "rights"
Any corporation's right to protect the privacy of its product should end at the public's right to have its will known in public elections. by Rrrandy-Steve (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 16 comments) on Tuesday, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:49:11 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |