![]() |
|
Tags for This Article:
Media (3115) People (2535) 2008 Elections (2176) Voting (1407) Republicans-GOP (1278) Republican GOP Dirty Tricks (620) Presidential Campaign Democratic (432) Elections_Campaigns (364) Presidential Campaign Democratic (310) Paul-Ron (299) Presidential Campaign Republican (284) Party Machine Republican (253) Congress Democrats (245) 2008 Democratic Natl Conv (204) Presidential Campaign Republican (189) 2008 Republican Natl Conv (172) Democrats Progressive (158) 2008 Republican Natl Conv (122) Congress Republican GOP (92) Republican Opposed To NeoCons (69) Congress Republican GOP (55)
|
(more...)
(less...)
Add to My Group
There were just over 7,000 votes cast in their poll. Ron Paul garnered 75% of the vote. This means approximately 5,250 votes were cast for Ron Paul, leaving the other 8 candidates with a combined total of approximately 1,750 votes. If we are compelled to abide by the mainstream media's "scientific" curve, then we are allowed to give Ron Paul no more than, say, 2% of the total. This means we can add approximately 36 votes for Ron Paul onto the 1,750, throwing out 5,214 Ron Paul votes. This leaves us with a grand total of 1,786 votes cast on CNBC's post-debate poll. What do I see in this? Either a)There was no spamming, in which case Ron Paul supporters outnumber CNBC viewers by far, or b)As CNBC claims, Ron Paul's total has to match the "scientific" polls, making everything else "spam," meaning CNBC had only 1,786 viewers who voted in the poll. From what I can tell, CNBC should be very concerned about its own ratings. The old media is dead. If polls showed that more than .05% of the population watches CNBC, I couldn't believe it. I would have to discard those poll results. Maybe CNBC is trying to conceal its piss poor ratings. How else do you explain the supporters of a man garnering "2%" in the "scientific" polls organizing so effectively that they are able to skew poll results of a network television station 3-to-1 in their favor, against 8 other candidates? See also: Media Elites Struggle to Keep Ron Paul Under Wraps and Press Ignores Paul GOP-Debate Win
www.NoAnthraxVaccine.net Mark served for four years on active duty in the Marine Corps infantry, and was a candidate for a municipal office in 2002. Mark has helped raise awareness of military and veterans' issues, by establishing No Anthrax Vaccine. His commentary has been carried by such sites as AntiWar.com. He spends much of his free time reading the great minds of the Austrian school of economics, such as Murray Rothbard, Henry Hazlitt, Ludwig von Mises, et al.
Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||