POPULATION TAKINGS - The Costs Of Belief And Per-Capita Ruin

Tags for This Article:

Populum Tag Cloud Control Panel
	Fine tune your search to access content

Articles	QuickLinks
Diaries	Products
All

All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs

From:
Month Day Year

To:
Month Day Year

Alphabet Popularity	Count ON Count OFF
This Level	Sub-levels

Tag(s): Abortion; Future; God; Immigration; People; Population; Population Growth
Add to My Group

October 3, 2007 at 18:59:10

POPULATION TAKINGS - The Costs Of Belief And Per-Capita Ruin

by Kent Welton Page 2 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com

We are already suffering tremendous species loss, land desertification, wars over water and serious climate change threats. We are losing the First World estate for our children and being dragged by costly dogma into the ever-inferior condition. This is criminal idiocy.

Believers must be made to pay for their beliefs which impact and affect others. Dogma has no privilege, no exemption, it is not sacrosanct to non-believers nor to Nature herself. Those who destroy the per-capita estate of their own children and all others steal the quality of life from everyone.

Today it is not the developed countries that present a problem as most have stable populations were it not for immigration, both legal and illegal. Instead it is the undeveloped world which remains imprisoned by religious dogma, and due to population ruin in their own countries seek to export their troubles.

In addition, the "gag" rule itself is a crime. The gag rule, now global, denies foreign organizations receiving U.S. family planning assistance a right to use their non-U.S. funds to provide legal abortion, or even counsel or refer for abortion, or even lobby for the legalization of abortion in their country.

This completely fascist gag rule, affecting non-believers as well, was originally announced by the Reagan administration at the 1984 United Nations Conference on Population in Mexico City. It was then rescinded in 1993 by President Clinton, and then reinstated in 2001 by President George W. Bush on his first business day in office.

First day in office and we have to screw the women!

And this in the time of the greatest ecosystem stress humanity has ever faced, as recently revealed by the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. This study, done by 1,360 experts in 95 nations, concluded a rising human population had polluted or over-exploited two-thirds of the ecological systems on which life depends, ranging from clean air to fresh water, in the past 50 years. Their conclusion: "Human activity is putting such strain on the natural functions of Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted,"

As the Dogma turns, increasing numbers of humans are damaging the planet at an unprecedented rate and raising the risks of abrupt collapses in nature that could spur disease, deforestation, and more fish-less "dead zones" in the seas.

Never has the morality of the two-child family, and balanced populations, been more clear and necessary. The sooner, the better, otherwise, it is outdated and dangerous "religious" dogma which will be the death of us.

Kent Welton,

TheCenterForBalance.org

1 | 2

TheCenterForBalance.org

Author, Exec. Dir. The Center For Balance. Websites: PanditPress.com, OligarchyUSA.com, PublicCentralBank.com, EditorFreedom.com, FascismUSA.COM & more

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

(More...)

1 comments

Graduated Class of 1965 in Southern California, when I feel there was a large split in society between those for the status quo and those for a better world. (Plus 5 years university units with no degree.) Activism and politics entered my life just before Bush I. I am a single mother (never married) of 2 adult daughters (7 years age difference,) one a brittle diabetic since age 4 requiring a life altering amount of hospitalizations. I presently live in the L...

to see more of bio, click on member name
ljsGraduated Class of 1965 in Southern California, when I feel there was a large split in society between those for the status quo and those for a better world. (Plus 5 years university units with no degree.) Activism and politics entered my life just before Bush I. I am a single mother (never married) of 2 adult daughters (7 years age difference,) one a brittle diabetic since age 4 requiring a life altering amount of hospitalizations. I presently live in the L...

to see more of bio, click on member name

One child per person maximum socially acceptable

I have been worried about this population explosion and its concurrent problems since the 70s when I first took a class in World Hunger at Cal Poly SLO, CA.

Yet, to this day women who have liters of offspring perpetuating their own DNA are praised like it was an amazing success story. It is supreme selfishness by the parents even at the expense of all those children they pop out.

The attitude of men needs to change as well. The reality is that men are on the whole not responsible for the dissemination of their seeds. It is still allowed to be an admirable trait to be a young man who "gets around" and has lots of lovers - but oh yes he should use a condom. Reality is that men don't use those condoms and it is all there is for men. Men are for the most part the researchers in the field that keeps coming up with more birth control for women - the ones with the delicate systems.

World hunger is a product of world population and world population is a product of those individual choices made one on one between men and women. The attitudes of society towards men who do not use condoms and selfishly spread their seeds around and towards women who have the selfishness to pop out a bunch of their own personal genetic offspring simply need to change. These need to be traits that are examples of supreme selfishness and slaps in the face of the rest of society when a person goes over one self replication.

You simply cannot outlaw the number of children a woman can bear but social attitudes can go a long way. Also, those tax credits for children need to cease. That is all we need is something encouraging people to have children.

All birth control has a failure rate, so as I stated, it cannot be something that is against the law or nightmare scenarios ensure.

Also, conception ends up always being on the shoulders of the woman and the men slide off scott free from their participation in this overpopulation. The WWII generation US men were still allowed to get away with blaming a pregnancy on a woman like maybe they took no part in that production.

Laws that state a pregnancy is a gift to a woman but not to a man still exist in many states in the US. This disparity in the legal system must change.

The very nature of women is to be nurturing and submissive to men. This is part of the whole sexual set up of nature. For example, oxytocin makes the women bond to the man but the man has no such bonding hormones that he gets from sex. Nature has stacked it against women.

In the Middle East, a man and a woman who have sex outside the sociatal parameters have it set up that the woman gets stoned to death and the man gets a tut-tut and off he goes to do it again. Womens clit can be removed so she does not enjoy sex and she has the reponsibility to not wear enticing clothing because men cannot supposedly control themselves. It couldn't possibly be their sexual enjoyment that might need reigning in. Lets get real here. Nice try guys. You got away with it for way too long. Man up and take the responsibility for your own bodies men. Quit blaming it all on women. They appear enticing you and that is not your fault. You would never entice a woman right? It could never be just a one-sided interest right? They get pregnant and that is not your fault. Something wrong with this plan - oh yeah, it is over populating the planet and you get off scott free while the women carry the burden. This simply must change. Mens bodies are far less fragile to alter physically so that they will not produce offspring, yet it is womens bodies that all the science goes after. Men still just have condoms and yet most the researchers in the field are men. Something wrong with this picture.

Over population is our biggest ultimate problem on this planet. Men must be held responsible. Society and the law have accept their responsibility in perpetuating this problem of producing more than just yourself. More than one child per person and then it becomes a socially unacceptable act.

by ljs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 43 comments) on Friday, October 5, 2007 at 2:02:49 AM

1 comments

Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008