Tags for This Article:

Race-Racism (572)  Activism Anti-War (453) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
February 17, 2008 at 15:44:37

Barack Obama and the "End" of Racism

by Juan Santos     Page 2 of 6 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

So we stay silent, as a rule, on the job.  We stay silent as a rule, in the white world.  

Barack Obama is the living symbol of our silence.  

He is our silence writ large.  

He is our Silence running for president –  

With respect to Black interests, Obama would be a silenced Black ruler: A muzzled Black emperor.  A Black man at the head of the White Amerikkkan State – one who’s unwilling to speak truth to power, but more than willing, like a Condi Rice or a Colin Powell, to become that power and to launch wars of aggression against other people of color.  

In Obama’s case the targets will be Iran (which he has threatened with “surgical” missile strikes) and Pakistan, rather than Iraq.  That’s the only difference between Obama and Rice and Powell, or Bush, for that matter.  

Even ABC News notes that “Obama, one of the more liberal candidates in the race, is proposing a geopolitical posture that is more aggressive than that of President Bush.”  Washington Post columnist Robert Kagan, in a column entitled “Obama, the Intervensionist,” cites Obama’s claim that “he wants the American military to ‘stay on the offense, from Djibouti to Kandahar.’”  To help the empire stay on the offensive, and despite the fact that US military spending is breaking the bank at over $1 trillion a year, and far outstrips the spending of any potential imperial rival, Obama wants to beef up military spending, adding 65,000 troops to the Army and 27,000 more Marines beyond the obscene levels already under arms in the so-called “War on Terror.” 

That’s another matter.  Most of us at my workplace, for example, don’t want to become that power, we don’t want to lord it over others or punish them if they disobey the corporate rules, much less the rules of Pax Amerikkkana.  We don’t want to “succeed” that badly, not badly enough to sell our souls and boss around - and certainly not kill - people who, we know, suffer every day just like we suffer. 

Nor do we want to be cops – pigs – or to be the commander in chief of pigs, be they local police or the cops of the world.  No one imagines themselves the commander. 

We’d like things to be better in our personal lives, of course, if we could have them better and still feel clean. 

And that’s the Obama equation.  Keep your Black/ Brown mouth shut and you can “succeed.”  And you can still feel “clean.”  Here we have the real story behind Obama’s portrayal of his squeaky clean-ness.  Yes, Black man, yes, Black woman, you can have power in this killer-racist system and stay “clean.”  In Obama’s carefully constructed image lies a symbolic resolution of a profound inner conflict that all people of color in the US face in their daily lives. 

Obama plays the role of a Black Cinderella.  He does for Black folks what Cinderella does for girls.  He shows that oppression and silence can be good for you – at least if you are the one the prince chooses, or if you are the one who gets to be the prince. It’s total fantasy.  It’s a glass slipper that will break at the arch and be turned on us like a broken beer bottle or a jagged-edged knife; the same knife Obama has threatened to turn on the people of Iran and Pakistan.  

But, he’s getting over with it, if for no other reason than that the inner conflict I’ve described remains largely unconscious for oppressed people in the US.  That’s why one Black poet, spoken word artist Darian Dauchan, wrote a piece called “Damn You Barack Obama You Pretty Mothafucka.”  It’s because Dauchan was trying to sort it through.  Even though he fails – he buys into the Obama myth- nonetheless he had to sort it through as best he could, because Obama is the walking illusion of the realization of an impossible dream; the dream that in white racist Amerikkka a Black man could be judged on the content of his character, not the color of his skin.   

There is, of course, a racist subtext to Obama being called “pretty”- it’s the subtext of internalized racism and the imposition of an internal color-caste system within the Black nation itself, a color-coded stratification held over from the era of slavery - the era of the “mulatto, the “half-breed,” “quadroon” and “octoroon”; a caste system in which “whiter” is better – smarter, “prettier,” more worthy, etc.  

The rest of the racist subtext is this: Obama, with his extraordinary intelligence and presence (by any standard), is, in the eyes of white Amerikkka,(and, according to the standards of the so-called “Enlightenment,” which still rule the thinking of Euro-Americans) the half-white, and thus, half-redeemed “Black savage” – “redeemed” by his “white blood”, “civilized” by it - redeemed by his relative whiteness- ultimately redeemed and refined by the white nation itself.  

The question from the Black perspective has been posed as to whether Obama is “Black enough” – which is to say, “Is he loyal enough to the Black nation?  The more decisive question, viewed from the white electorate’s standpoint, at least, is this; “Is he white enough, is he loyal enough to whiteness and to the white nation?”  That’s why the question of his religion, and of his Arabic name, are points of attack and vulnerability from the standpoint of the more openly racist and xenophobic sectors of the white public.  That’s why his “patriotism” is also questioned, unlike any white candidate.  After all, everyone in the US knows that people of color with Arabic names are the enemy.  It doesn’t matter, apparently, how many nukes Obama wants to hit Iran with, he’s got to stand up and recite the pledge of allegiance to prove he’s not a terrorist – at least not an anti-US terrorist. 

 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Juan Santos is a Los Angeles based writer and editor. His essays can be found at: http://the-fourth-world.blogspot.com /. He can be reached at: JuanSantos at Mexica.net.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments

Song sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Michael BonannoSong sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mr. Santos, I agree that Barrack Obama

is an insider.  How and why Barrack Obama got himself into the position to be wealthy enough to be taken seriously as a candidate for president is unknown to me.  I believe that there’s probably some truth that he is promising to do what corporations, mostly, but not all, run by White men, want him to do.

If he and McCain are the theatrical presentations of our exclusionary, Wizard of Oz political system, we will once again have a choice to press buttons on an electronic machine and fool ourselves into thinking that we are voting for one of two evils, neither of which is less evil.  If the gods of the factory choose the name “Hillary Clinton” to be on the computer screen instead of “Barrack Obama”, the choices will be no less evil.

Mr. Santos, if the purpose of your article was to push a 58 year old man whom you don’t know to shove a gun in his mouth and pull the trigger, your “passion” could very well have done that.

Because of the color of my skin, everything I’ve done on behalf of what I consider Progressive causes has been meaningless.

You used the phrase “white Amerikkka” seven times in your article.  I almost feel as though I should apologize to you, personally, for being white in The FUSA (The Former United States of America).

It’s not a matter of not wanting to apologize to you.  It’s that I just can’t.  Literally, I can’t.

It’s like listening to a Catholic stumbling over his or her feet to try to explain the One true God made up of three, I don’t know, what can we call them, items?  Is it one God or three Gods?  In my limited human brain, I can not grasp it.  It’s one but it’s three but it’s one.  It’s impossible.

Or it’s like Robertson saying he’s pro life and then suggesting we snuff out the life of Hugo Chávez.  Yes, end a life.  It’s seems like it’s an impossibility to kill when you claim to be pro-life.

I’m an atheist, so I won’t say that I was created White.  I’m White for some random reason which I am far too scientifically ignorant to understand.
I didn’t, in my preexistent years, go to some pre-life ballot box and vote to be White.

However, I’ve fought, to the best of my ability and understanding, for what I feel are Progressive, even Socialist values.

Today there is a physical condition, another condition for which I never cast a ballot, that pretty much limits me to fight for the same causes through writing.  I write articles, poetry and music to try to catch an ear that might lead to a mind that will understand that we are all human beings and we need each other’s help to survive in this, the only world in which we’ll ever live.

Now I read you article and I feel as though, since I’ve never been Black or even Hispanic, everything I’ve fought for in every way in which I’ve fought has created nothing more than a vacuum which many of us human beings will never be able to see past.

I think a woman should have the right to decide what happens to her body.  I don’t think a woman should be condemned to carry her father’s rape consequence to term.  However, you’ve just taught me an important lesson.  I can’t think that.  In fact, how dare I think that?  How arrogant of me to believe that I can fight to protect a woman’s rights when, after all, I’m a man.

In an article I wrote entitled “Shock Over Richards’ Rant Curious”, I give a very vivid example of how racism was far from ended as recently as the 1980s and I’m sure is far from ended today.

When we tack your definition of racism on to what’s real, not only has racism not ended, it will never end.  Those who don’t experience an injustice don’t have the innate ability nor the right to advocate for those who are suffering from the injustice.  By nature of the color of my skin, Mr. Santos, I am not qualified to have felt the way I did in the meeting to which I refer in the above link and was not qualified to investigate, once I did make my own place as a supervisor, who placed a noose in a Black man’s toolbox.

He came to me, Mr. Santos, and, because I was his supervisor, told me about the noose.  He trusted me because, away from work, we were friends.  Well, I thought we were friends.  You straightened me out on that, Mr. Santos.

I grew up in the neighborhood of Howard Street in New London, Connecticut.  When I played sandlot football, I was always chosen last.  It’s not that I wasn’t a pretty decent player, mind you.  But when everyone else was chosen, I just stood and waited for the words, “OK, I’ll take the little White boy.”

No, Mr. Santos, that doesn’t inject me with whatever it takes to be a Black person in “white Amerikkka”.  And I don’t take any comfort knowing that no Black person will ever really know what it’s like to be White in Black America.  I do know this, however, if we continue to call this disunified nation “White” or “Black” or “Hispanic” or “Chinese” America, it will, with no doubt at all, remain just that.  The Former United States of America – am I wrong to even use that term?  Has this nation ever been The United States of America?


This is all al moot point, however, Mr. Santos, if the only White person worthy of your respect is your “radical White friend”.

Mr. Santos, I can only speak for myself, but I can guarantee that no one living upon this earth will stop me from advocating, in whatever manner I am able, for those in need; women whom men, mostly, but not all, White men are still trying to control; people of color who are ignored, turned away or otherwise disenfranchised by mostly, but not all, White men; people who are punished for coming here from Mexico to accept jobs from business leaders who are mostly, but not all, White people; workers, Black, White or of any other ethnicity, who lose jobs in The FUSA because CEOs of large corporations commit the most unpatriotic act of all, they, with malice aforethought, hurt Americans in favor of their own personal greed; Chinese, African, South and Central American and Asian people who work under inhumane conditions because of so called “free trade” agreements.
 
No, Mr. Santos, I’m not praying or waiting for some other life to help those that I can help, even if I can’t be them.

Sí se puede, pero solamente si lo hacemos todos juntos.

Michael Bonanno

by Michael Bonanno (87 articles, 19 quicklinks, 24 diaries, 124 comments) on Sunday, February 17, 2008 at 4:04:35 PM
 


Juan Santos is a Los Angeles based writer and editor. His essays can be found at:
http://the-fourth-world.blogspot.com /. He can be reached at: JuanSantos at Mexica.net.

Juan SantosJuan Santos is a Los Angeles based writer and editor. His essays can be found at:
http://the-fourth-world.blogspot.com /. He can be reached at: JuanSantos at Mexica.net.

No Guilt/ No Fear

Dear Michael;

We have an opposite situation. I have a condition that makes writing one of the most punishing things I can do to myself physically; So, please bear with me if this is too brief, and rest assured that my thoughts are probably more extensive and comprehensive than what I will be able to say right now. If you would like to pursue this further, please feel free to write me privately at juansantos@mexica.net, and I will do my best to engage you in a meaningful way as time and health permit.

My first response is this; I haven’t offered a definition of racism, and I have no desire to create feelings of “white guilt,” nor any intention to do so. My intended audience here was people from the oppressed nationalities. Specifically, I wrote it for the audience of the website Black Agenda Report, which has accepted it for publication.

Guilt and innocence are irrelevant. The relevant point about racism is the same as the point I made about Obama himself: “It should be more than clear by now that Barack Obama will not save us. But neither is the point to expose the man as an individual, or even as a hypocrite, betrayer or oppressor The point is to see him in context,within the limits of the system, the matrix, the cultural and political environment in which he arose and in which he operates."

My concern, although not explicitly stated, is to address racism sociologically, not legally, academically, genetically, or as an ideology, per se – certainly not as an ideology held by individuals in isolation, and certainly not from the standpoint of the soul-saving “damned or saved” dichotomy of Western civilization and Christianity. Neither the problem nor the solution are individualistic. They are, rather, systemic. Racial oppression is a system, just as Apartheid was a system in S. Africa (and there it is a system that has yet to be totally uprooted, especially as racial oppression intersects with class oppression.)

A sense of guilt on the part of white people has no impact whatsoever on racism as a system. Every white reader of this piece can feel guilty for the next 20 years, and flog themselves dawn to dusk, but that will not free a single Native American, Black or Brown person from prison. To change the system of racism we have to see it in its entirety. That involves both dismantling institutions and transforming our awareness.

The point about the new form racism has taken is that, while Jim Crow was dismantled, it was replaced by a system of mass incarceration and class-based “integration” that is just as deadly, and that has, furthermore, served to divide and conquer the Black nation while pulling the wool over the eyes of white people as a whole.

When was the last time you saw a report in the mainstream broadcast media about the mass incarceration of peoples of color? Have you ever seen such a report in the major media? I haven’t.

40 years now after the official end of Apartheid/ Jim Crow in the US, the average net worth of white families is 11 times more than Latinos and more than 14 times that of blacks. Where are the headlines, and who are we to blame for their individual ignorance? Blame of individual white people is the furthest thing from the point.

The realities we live in present themselves to us as normal, and no one is cuing us to the fact that we live, to this day, in separate and unequal realities. To the extent that I intended to reach a white audience, it was to offer just such a cue, not to blame people as individuals. Individualism is a disease, in the first place, a way of seeing oneself as separate, unequal and self determined in an over-determined matrix. It’s a total illusion, and the solution to social ills is impossible within its framework.

I can appreciate that catching a glimpse of the totalitarian nature of the matrix of racial oppression could be overwhelming and make one feel powerless. But ask yourself at what point you personally had the leverage to change any of it in any decisive manner.

 

As I wrote in an as-yet unpublished essay, “The system is holographic. At every point in the Matrix resides the entire power of the violence and illusion of the whole.” There is no way that any individual can leverage the whole. Not Barack Obama, and certainly not anyone reading this.

 

Although whites as a group profit from the system of racism, and although we’ve been trapped in it since birth, not one of us willed this death cult into being, not one of us invented it.

 

White guilt is the experience of people who have not seen the systemic whole of racism, who have felt powerless to address what they see, or who have chosen to benefit from it rather than oppose it. Anyone who has consciously fought to end racism should identify themselves as a freedom fighter, or as an ally of freedom fighters. Anyone who hasn’t should identify themselves as a conscious or unconscious exploiter. White guilt is a choice.

Sincerely,

Juan Santos 

by Juan Santos (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments) on Sunday, February 17, 2008 at 6:08:51 PM
 


Los Angeles.It conjures up an asphalt web of insulated individuals occasionally Crashing into each other. It is that, it's designed to be that, but in the spaces between the asphalt and concrete, and sometimes on those hard spaces that shut out the earth, there is life, community, and rebellion. What I write is part of that story.Me? I'm a middle-aged, middle-class, white woman, residing in Los Angeles. Sometimes I hang out with people who are living and changing life in L.A.
Leslie RadfordLos Angeles.It conjures up an asphalt web of insulated individuals occasionally Crashing into each other. It is that, it's designed to be that, but in the spaces between the asphalt and concrete, and sometimes on those hard spaces that shut out the earth, there is life, community, and rebellion. What I write is part of that story.Me? I'm a middle-aged, middle-class, white woman, residing in Los Angeles. Sometimes I hang out with people who are living and changing life in L.A.

Mr. Bonnano, you don't need to kill yourself

Mr. Bonnano,

What gives you the arrogance and the foolishness to speculate that "the purpose of [Mr. Santos'] article was to push a 58 year old man whom you don't know to shove a gun in his mouth and pull the trigger"?

I'm white. I know what got you there: white culture. We're supposed to define the terms, "people of color" must befriend us, our anti-racist bona fides must be acknowledged, as you so grandly illustrate in your comment when you ignore nearly everything Mr. Santos said so you can go on about your hurt feelings. We must be included.

We got told that we might not be Mr. Santos' or our employee's friend, we got told that our vote for Obama maybe wasn't a good thing, and our self-worth evaporates. I understand why you put your sacrifices for "the cause" in print, an autobiographical testimonial to why you are the exception, why your feelings should matter. Now you can reassure yourself that you're necessary, that you have a reason to live--that your "understanding" really, truly has made a difference.

We set the terms. We get to "advocate for those in need" and no one can stop us, apparently even the people we determine are in need. We know, don't we, that Mr. Santos is in need of our outrage. He forgot, for just a moment, that we were watching and we must always be included. After all, he moved his article here, to "our" space, OpEd News. And when he did, he had the gall to forget about us, about our good work, our fight for his cause. If we don't get to set the terms, that "people of color" must appreciate us, then we can't figure out a reason to live.

Bonus! We have The Answer to cultural/racial/ethnic differences: don't talk about them. Pretend they're not real, just erase them, close our eyes, make the colors go away. Call them class differences, colorblindness, whatever, but ignore them, by any means necessary. Then we can restore the "united states," we don't have to live in what you cutely call FUSA. Why, we ask ourselves, won't "people who aren't white" get it? Why must Al Sharpton and Russell Means keep going on about race?

Your demand for silence, of course, is one of Mr. Santos' points: Obama's silence about "those things" makes white people comfortable. We want the silence; we need the silence. We get apoplectic when Mr. Santos calls out difference, when he says whiteness is the problem.

But, Michael, I thought I was the exception. You can't be the exception, too. And neither one of us can be the exception if Tim Bennett's the exception. Unless all white progressives are the exception! That sounds good, doesn't it? Let's remind Mr. Santos: in future, sir, any mention of whiteness should make an exception for all white progressives.

Mr. Santos offers a spectacularly researched and fresh perspective on what Obama's popularity means, but he makes the mistake of lumping white (see--"white" isn't capitalized!) progressives in with the rest of white Amerikkka. Because we're white, we respond with our hurt feelings, our progressive credentials, and our terms. It's not our fault! We've sacrificed! We didn't choose our skin color!

Nobody did, Mr. Bonnano.

Now you're going to be outraged at me, no doubt, because I called it out: you got dissed, so, according to you, Mr. Santos must be a "racist."

For all I get it, I'm not exactly like you. Close, but not quite. You see, I'm one of those women you're fighting to protect. And I don't want your protection. I want you to get out of the way. I want you to wait in your chair, stay out of sight, maybe struggle with some men, and watch me fight for the right to my own life. When you're useful to our fight, I'll let you know. Until then, please sit quietly and learn.

--Leslie Radford

by Leslie Radford (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 11 comments) on Sunday, February 17, 2008 at 10:08:16 PM
 


A writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Mark SashineA writer is a rogue goose. All other gees fly in a flock formation; every goose knows his place and time for honking. The rogue goose is undisciplined. He leaves the formation indiscriminately to have a look at it from aside. He roams back and forth, takes a peep at the leader, honks a little bit from behind, distracts everyone and writes on what he sees. Time passes and as he wants to return back to his place he discovers someone else there. Thus he either has to wait until they land for rest...

to see more of bio, click on member name

This is a crucial thing

I really love the article above  but '  I don't want your help' is childish, sorry.

We all need each other.  Otherwise we will all 'hang together'. The system favors not whites, it favors the WHITE POWER.  Those whites who are not in power have only the privilege to die  for it.  Without helping each other we will not survive. I, a white man need my black/mexican  fellow- American to survive. That simple.  You also need me.  Those who do not need us-kill us.

 

by Mark Sashine (53 articles, 19 quicklinks, 249 diaries, 3574 comments) on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 8:19:21 AM
 


Song sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Michael BonannoSong sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Ms. Radford,

I’m not about to kill myself.  Why would I want to exit the only world I’ll ever know and in which I can make a positive difference? 

The hyperbole in the beginning of my response suggests merely that Mr. Santos’s article could frustrate those whose hearts and minds are in the right place.

I'm one of those women you're fighting to protect.  And I don't want your protection.  I want you to get out of the way.  I want you to wait in your chair, stay out of sight, maybe struggle with some men, and watch me fight for the right to my own life.  When you're useful to our fight, I'll let you know.  Until then, please sit quietly and learn.” 

The above quote is yet another message to those who you’ve stereotyped, an activity that the Civil Rights movement of the 60s was supposed to negate.

Allow me to paraphrase your statement as I hear it: “I don’t need your help and I don’t want your help because you don’t know what it’s like to be me.  I’m a victim and you’re a White man.  Boo-hoo.” 

Why is it that you don’t want my help?  You weren’t clear in answering that question. 

What was clear is that you misrepresented almost everything I wrote, but that’s not unusual with arguments from passion alone, minus the “research” about which you speak. 

And your research only needed to be to read my response and truthfully represent it. 

No, I’m not outraged at you or Mr. Santos.  It is sad, not a “White guilt” sadness, but a sadness that those of us who need help would turn help away. 

I experience situations in which I could use some help and would accept your help and Mr. Santos’s help. 

No, Ms Radford, I’m not in your way.  I don’t even know where “your way” starts and everyone else’s ends or visa versa.  I look for synergy in solving as many of society’s dysfunctions as possible. 

Having said that, you can see why it’s impossible for me, and always will be impossible for me, to “stay in my chair” or “sit quietly”.  You may find this bothersome, but that ain’t gonna happen. 

Learning, on the other hand, can only help in my search for synergy.  I feel no guilt, only the necessity to do something and do something I will. 

Michael Bonanno

by Michael Bonanno (87 articles, 19 quicklinks, 24 diaries, 124 comments) on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 11:48:01 AM
 


Having lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bill SamuelHaving lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Thank you.

This is the best article on Obama I've seen yet.  And there was actually useful information in it that I had not previously known.  Thank you for it.

I happen to be of European extraction, and I didn't find anything offensive to me in the article.  I was somewhat astounded at Michael Bonanno's response, but I guess I shouldn't have been, because I've seen this kind of reaction many times before.

I think one error that many people who fancy themselves progressive make is assuming that Democrats are better on foreign interventionism than Republicans.  In my lifetime, the worst president on that was JFK, and the second worst LBJ.

Just looking at the Bush Administration, Bush actually has very mixed feelings, often overshadowed by the influence of Cheney and other extremists around him.  Only a couple of years ago, he suggested that the U.S. might not really need all the hundreds of major military bases around the world we've accumulated over several decades, and that we should start a process of withdrawing from many of them rather than increasing the size of the military forces, which Democrats had been advocating for years.  Democrats in Congress reacted with horror, and their Republican colleagues mostly sided with the Democrats rather than their President, and the idea died.

In the last Congressional campaign, Democrats campaigned with the argument that Bush had weakened the U.S. militarily and they would restore U.S. military strength.  House Democrats campaigned on a "Six for '06" platform, of which the first plank was to strengthen the military by increasing the military budget and the size of the military forces.  When Democrats won the Congress, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid immediately said it was a mandate for a $50 billion increase in the military budget.  And Democrats have continually attacked the Administration for not backing the illegal military and repressive actions of the State of Israel more.

The irony is that the voters thought they were voting for a more peaceful way by voting in the Democrats in 2006, while the Democratic leaders took it as a mandate for increased militarism.  Both Obama and Clinton represent this mainstream Democratic push towards greater militarism and interventionism. 

Mind you, I'm not suggesting voting for Republicans.  Particularly this year as McCain is very extreme on this, about the worst in his Party or either major Party (the closest is Joe Lieberman, now technically an Independent, who I still think is a likely choice for VP by McCain).  I am suggesting that there is no hope at the Presidential level in the two major parties (there are some Democratic Congressional candidates who do represent a real difference). 

by Bill Samuel (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 338 comments) on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 1:58:02 PM
 


Los Angeles.It conjures up an asphalt web of insulated individuals occasionally Crashing into each other. It is that, it's designed to be that, but in the spaces between the asphalt and concrete, and sometimes on those hard spaces that shut out the earth, there is life, community, and rebellion. What I write is part of that story.Me? I'm a middle-aged, middle-class, white woman, residing in Los Angeles. Sometimes I hang out with people who are living and changing life in L.A.
Leslie RadfordLos Angeles.It conjures up an asphalt web of insulated individuals occasionally Crashing into each other. It is that, it's designed to be that, but in the spaces between the asphalt and concrete, and sometimes on those hard spaces that shut out the earth, there is life, community, and rebellion. What I write is part of that story.Me? I'm a middle-aged, middle-class, white woman, residing in Los Angeles. Sometimes I hang out with people who are living and changing life in L.A.

On blaming Mr. Santos for your suicide

Mr. Bonanno,

It's not that you threatened suicide, hyperbolically or not. It's that you said Mr. Santos might have purposely pushed you there, and your answer was a lengthy apologia for yourself, and by implication, white progressives. The former is a personal problem that I have no business addressing. The second concerns me.

Your second comment goes right back there: poor me, women don't want a man's help. But what I said, if you'll read it, is let women take the lead and we'll let you know what you can do. I didn't turn you away, nor did Mr. Santos. We just didn't include you, we didn't send out engraved invitations especially to white progressive men. You chose to turn away rather than wait, rather than follow, rather than be like everybody else. And you made that choice while you blamed Mr. Santos for your suicidal fantasies.

If you're wondering why white progressives are not more often welcome, I believe it's precisely because we won't sit quietly. Too many of us seem compelled to speak out, to be heard saying something, anything. I know, because I have the same urge (and sometimes indulge it, to my embarrassment) at meetings concerning Brown or Black issues. And we blame everyone but ourselves when nobody listens.

But, gawd, I hope I don't do what you just did: label the folks I want to work with "victims"; contrast their victimhood to my whiteness; mock their passion ("boo hoo"); "interpret" what they say for them; dismiss their reading comprehension skills (even as you and the gentleman before you rewrite "I don't want your protection" as "I don't want your help"); deny them rational ability ("arguments from passion alone"); and, as I slam the door, shake my head with a patriarchal/godly "sadness" at their condition.

You, sir, who start with talk of suicide and end with the above, don't get to speak of emotional fallacies. More importantly, you don't get to blame me (and I don't get to blame the immigrants or the prisoners) for not offering up my chair to you, serving you tea and crumpets with homemade jam, the next time you decide to burst into the meeting.

You don't get to speak for me until you feel what the verdict in the Jessie Davis murder really means, feel it, not just rationally, but like a kick in the genitalia. If you'll admit you can't do that, I'll try not to speak for people who are confronting their oppressions, either.

--Leslie Radford

by Leslie Radford (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 11 comments) on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 3:11:41 PM
 


Song sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Michael BonannoSong sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Apology

I work for OpEdNews and I consider it part of my job to maintain the professionalism and high standards of OEN. 

To outright call one a “racist” is not something that an assistant editor for a news outlet should be doing and it was wrong of me to use that term blatantly and offensively. 

For this reason, I ask you to accept my apology, Mr. Santos.  

It's my intention, and always has been my intention to promote serious discussion about serious issues in a serious manner.

I've removed the offensive invective.

Again, Mr. Santos, I apologize for my momentary lapse in good judgment. 

Michael Bonanno

by Michael Bonanno (87 articles, 19 quicklinks, 24 diaries, 124 comments) on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 7:23:53 PM
 


Song sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Michael BonannoSong sample for November, 2008 Casey's Song from the cd Flameland. Michael Bonanno is a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.  Some of his poetry can be found at The Poetry Corner at OpEdNews.He is an associate editor for OpEdNews.  Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's government's job to help the needy and that leaving the people's well being to the so called "private sector" is social suicide.His CDs may...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I can't continue

to try to explain to you how one human being, no matter his or her ethnicity or color, can note the injustice in the world and do what ever can be done to address and work, in whatever way possible, to fight the injustice.

 

This is neither the time nor the place to be psychoanalyzed by one whose response is a constant, “Keep trying.  You may get it yet.  Meanwhile, go sit down and be silent.”

 

Be silent, hey?  How interesting.  Is the implication that it’s now my, our, whatever, turn to be silent.  Is history the process of groups taking turns demanding other groups to be silent?  Truly, is it now my turn to be silent?  I hope not.  I won’t be silent.  I don’t speak up for any group.  I speak up advocating for groups who are being treated unjustly.

And, please, remember that my original response, as imperfect as it was, was to Mr. Santos and some of the points he made in his article.

Mine is the only response to which he’s responded thus far and, of course, that’s his prerogative. 

It’s fortunate for him that he’s had you to speak up for him.

Mr. Samuel, I'd much prefer my position as being a Progressive, even a Socialist as opposed to “fancying myself” a Progressive, thank you.

 

I have no use for Democrats or Republicans.  For me, they are two sleeves of the same shirt which I call The Corporacracy. 

 

There is other news and I feel as though I should read it, maybe to see how it ties into this or into any other issue as well.

Michael Bonanno

by Michael Bonanno (87 articles, 19 quicklinks, 24 diaries, 124 comments) on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 8:16:43 PM
 


Juan Santos is a Los Angeles based writer and editor. His essays can be found at:
http://the-fourth-world.blogspot.com /. He can be reached at: JuanSantos at Mexica.net.

Juan SantosJuan Santos is a Los Angeles based writer and editor. His essays can be found at:
http://the-fourth-world.blogspot.com /. He can be reached at: JuanSantos at Mexica.net.

HELP? No thanks - Allies? Sure.

We are not "needy" people. We are OPPRESSED people. If there is something we need it is not because we are "less fortunate," as the liberal babble goes, or "underprivileged," it is because we face the full weight of the state and the full weight of the genocidal traditions of Slavery and Conquest - and for women, ten millenia of a regime of rape and battering.

Viewed in this terribly obvious and terribly elementary light it is obvious that one would not want the help of one's Conqueror or Slave Master or Rapist.

Oppression is about VIOLENCE.

But, oh, I know. You "didn't do it". "That was then, this is now." Everyone is really just an individual, there is no oppression, and the oppressed are really "in charge of their own destiny" - as individuals, of course, and this is especially true of the millions upon millions of oppressed peoples in prison, no doubt, who, no doubt, are there because they are "criminals. " ("They're just like that, you know!) Racism, of course, is "over."

"They're" just too ignorant and needy to know it like you do. They're not really clear on how the white system works. Let you give them a hand. Noblesse Oblige, all that. Condescending saviors. Objects of Charity. All THAT.

Thanks for the advice. We couldn't have done it without you.

Juan Santos

by Juan Santos (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments) on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at 2:40:26 AM