The "In Plane Site" crew stepped in, and they took the initiative with what? Pods! It was "pods" that were going to break 9/11 wide open! Sure, the (normal) wing fairings [2] under the 767's that struck the World Trade Center were now giant protrusions that can only have been put there by demonic conspirators, who don't mind letting it all hang out in front of the NY press.
The reflective properties of the aluminum airplane skin were not to be scrutinized; just take it from the video: pods, pods, pods.
DISINFO 2.0
Well that's the disinformation of yesteryear. Today, they have fired up the thrusters, and they are on some kind of disinformation rampage over at the dark side think tanks. It has become some kind of contest to pass along the most insane nonsense for the willing dupes out there to slurp up.
No planes hit the WORLD TRADE CENTER???
Of all the preposterous garbage I have come across, this one takes the feces. On its face, with very little effort or time, this senselessness is debunked in several ways. If you see the term "TV Fakery", get out, click onward, make a hasty lunge for saner pastures. You'll thank me later.
On top of many thousands of eyewitnesses looking directly up at the second plane as it crashed into the South Tower, and the photographs, and the videos, and the entry holes, the exit holes, the explosions which travelled through the buildings, the radar tracks, etc., none of this is good enough for the "No planers." They know better.
What is it exactly they think they know?
They know that all the live broadcasts were easily faked in realtime on all national and local TV stations simultaneously -- BACKWARDS. Yes, backwards is my word for it, because you see if there was no plane in the sky, and it had to be drawn in by computers, the only way to synchronize all this (with teams of how many witnesses? in how many locations? with how much precise foreknowledge? and for what reason?) is to think of it as a pre-timed explosion, and that the plane had to be calculated in backwards from the prearranged, agreed upon time of detonation, and at the precise locations where these explosives were planted, and this information had to be given to numerous technical staff in many media organizations...
They're pushing this as a "serious" concept! You can't write this shit.
Given how live cameras use lenses with analog zooming, meaning they show you a frame where the operator chooses the framing angle -- and can pan and tilt at the whim of the cameraman -- there seems to be NO WAY IN HELL this is even remotely feasible even for one network that was a direct subsidiary of the intelligence service allegedly perpetrating this hoax.
The "no planer" position is that ALL videos and ALL phtotographs of that plane crash were controlled and "faked" by the invisible hands of the puppet masters!
(SOURCE: Camcorder footage of Pavel Hlava [4].)
(SOURCE: Camcorder footage posted by Jeremy Morrison [5].)
Of course all the private footage was rapidly converted to show the "fakery," and no one ever talked about it. In fact no one even thought of this blatantly bogus baloney for years after 9/11/01.
Next the "TV Fakery" people tell you that the landing gear (and any other airplane wreckage in NYC) was "planted," without a shred of evidence to support this theory. Why do they tell you this?
