Tags for This Article:

Security (1212)  Terrorism (999)  Cheney Dick (750)  Afghanistan (677)  Afghanistan (602)  Pakistan (591)  People Dick Cheney (560)  Pakistan (366)  Diplomacy (310)  Taliban (285)  Taliban (263)  Taliban (255)  Foreign Policy Failure Afghanistan (171)  Foreign Policy Failure Pakistan (58)  Pervez Musharraf (32) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
August 9, 2007 at 17:28:36

Cheney's Stand on Musharraf Reversed?

by John Carey     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

“Think of Musharraf who puts his neck on the line every day he goes to work, when there’ve been attempts on his life because of his support for our position. And they look over here and they see the United States that’s made a commitment to the Iraqis, that’s gone in and taken down the old regime, worked to set up a democracy, worked to set up security forces, and all of a sudden we say it’s too tough, we’re going home. What’s Karzai going to think up in Kabul? Is he going to have any confidence at all that he can trust the United States, that in fact we’re there to get the job done? What about Musharraf? Or is Musharraf and those people you’re talking about who are on the fence in Afghanistan and elsewhere going to say, ‘My gosh, the United States hasn’t got the stomach for the fight. Bin Laden’s right, al-Qaeda’s right, the United States has lost its will and will not complete the mission,’ and it will damage our capabilities and all of those other war fronts, if you will, in the global war on terror.”

As this quote indicates, this is not a cautious politician saying, “Musharraf is doing his best.”

Vice President Cheney’s strong and long statement of support for Mr. Musharraf is almost unprecedented in foreign diplomacy. We say “almost unprecedented” because there could be a stronger supportive statement of one ally for another in the history of man. But if we read a stronger one we cannot recall it today.

And if Mr. Cheney is “out” on Musharraf; then who is “in”?

We believe the answer to that question is Ms. Frances Fragos Townsend, President Bush’s Homeland Security Advisor.

If Mr. Cheney still believes his words from Sunday, September 10, 2006; then where is he now?

Visit us at:
http://johnibii.wordpress.com/

 1  |  2

 

http://peace-and-freedom.blogspot.com/

John E. Carey is the former president of International Defense Consultants, Inc.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments

A 'senior' world citizen concerned about how badly our shared domicile is being ravaged by imperialists, dominionists, neo-cons and evangelists.
syed mahdiA 'senior' world citizen concerned about how badly our shared domicile is being ravaged by imperialists, dominionists, neo-cons and evangelists.

"Cheney's Stand on Musharraf Reversed?" By John Carey

I beg to disagree with Mr.Carey and Mr. Khurshid, both. The tribesmen in the so called North West Frontier Province where Khurshid hails from, are blood brothers of the Pushtoon tribesmen across the border in Afghanistan. They fought the British Empire for a hundred years or more, to maintain their independence and freedom. The British gave up on their dreams of governing this region from New Delhi, the capital of the erstwhile British Raj and settled for total self rule in the region which they named as the North West Frontier Province whose tribal chieftains, in return, agreed to fly the Union Jack in the said NWFP. When the British departed the incoming Govt of Pakistan in 1947 agreed to leave the 'arrangements' made by the British intact which was a sound decision because in the decade preceding the British withdrawal, this NWFP region had begun asking for an independent Pakhtoonistan under the leadership of their Leader, the Frontier Gandhi who was closer to India than to Pakistan. The Pashtuns or Pakhtoon's did not get their Independent State and agreed to stop their successionist Movement as soon they were assured they would get the best of two worlds from Pakistan; one, they would remain a semi-sovereign Province, two, they would have also have the same rights in Pakistan as any other Pakistani from Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and what was up and until 1971, East Pakistan; rights in the national budgets of Pakistan, voting rights, seats in the National Parliament etc etc. Then came the Communist take over in Afghanistan which turned the tables on the Pashtuns/Pakhtuns across the border from NWFP. The Afghan Commies were mostly from the minority ethnic groups in Afghanistan, that is, the Uzbeks, the Hazaras, the Turkomans, the Kirghiz etc. The Commies were also athiests and the Pakhtuns/Pashtuns were deeply religious Muslims. The Commies came down heavily on the Pashtuns, triggering wide spread and popular resistance in which they were supported by their Pakistani kinsmen, the Pashtuns/Pakhtuns in NWFP, i.e, Pakistan. Just about when the Commies were about to be ousted, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan to bolster the failing Communist Regime in Afghanistan. When this happened the Americans and their Muslim Allies in the Islamic Belt of the Arabian Gulf got into action. The rest is recent history requiring no memory freshening. As soon as the Soviets were forced to abandon their misadventure in Afghanistan, America also lost interest in Afghanistan and in the Islamic Mujaheedin on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistan border and left Afghanistan and Pakistan and their ex-Islamic supporters in the Arabian Gulf, the job of cleaning up the mess they and the Soviets had left behind them in Pakistan and Afghanistan which included thousands of tons of arms and ammunition, several hundred Religious Schools on both sides of the Pak-Afghan border which were set up with American approval and funding. It was these Islamic Madrasas which provided the fighters for the Mujaheedin, which later metamorphosed into Taleban controlled religious schools. Post Soviet and American withdrawals, Afghanistan and to some extent even Pakistan were in no shape to do anything about these religious schools, except to allow them to remain intact. They had no money to replace them with proper schools or the means to invest in the economic development in these Pashtun/Pakhtun region. The genie had escaped from its bottle and without financial help from America tis genie couldn't be bottled in again. Then came Taleban's successful bid for power in Afghanistan and the OIL/Gas Pipeline or pipe dream of the Oilies in America. Had the Taleban agreed to the pipeline to let pass, America would have allowed the Taleban to consolidate their murderous hold on Afghanistan to this day. But this was not to be. In all this melee entered Al Qaida, which were mainly Gulf Arabs who were very anti-American but for reasons other than America's doings in Afghanistan. Their anger was due to American Policies and double standards in their part of the World, like blind support for Israel and the pro-US regimes in the Arabian Gulf. Since they were a motley crowd and not a political party based in nowhere and being hotly pursued by the Governments in their domiciles but still very angry, they found refuge and protection in Afghanistan which they got due to same credd religion, same hate for America for reasons closer to Afghanistan than Israel. Then came 9/11 which brought the American Bull back into the Afghan China shop with nothing more than REVENGE on its mind. They had no post war/conquest plan or strategy, just Armitage type of bombing the shit out of them. Unfortunately, their shit hit the fan not only in Afghanistan but also in Iraq and the whole Middle East. The cleaning up of all this shit will take decades. Of and on blaming of Karazai, Musharraf and Iran & the voiced Arimitage type bombings of NWFP, the Cheney type nuking of Iran and Obama style nuking of Pakistan wil not clean any shit. On the contrary it will add more shit and more wind to the fan! Unfortunately the American Establishment does not understand all this, neither does it have the time to understand all this. The 'parliament of whores' in Washington DC has so many pimps (lobbies) running around in its labyrinths and with elections very two years, they have no time for developing any meaningful Foreign Policy for this part of the world. Friends and foes of America in the Region change every week end. The blaimimg games goes on and on and on and the ONLY policy that all agree on is the Policy forced down their gullets by the Lobbies, especially the Israeli Lobbies. It's not working and will continue not working till Kingdom come! America will nuke Iran, get rid of Musharrafand nuke Pakistan. Then what? More Iraqs for America in Iran, Pakistan and Syria? Then what? Does Mr.Khurshid or the so-called Washington based Experts on 'this and that' have any answers? I have. 

1. In this region America is the problem, it's not the solution.

2. In America, the Lobbies are the problem, not the solutions

3. Solutions proffered by all the fancy named study houses in

    Washington are the problems, not the solutions.

4. America should get the hell out of this Region and spend its wealth on

    Americans in America, before it gets bankrupted and starts begging from China.

5. This withdrawal will be in the best interests of all concerned including Israel.

Knock! Knock! Any body listening? No? It's too dangerous to listen because of the tapping of communications? Listening is also felony now in America? Oops, I made a mistake! I thought I was calling America. I am so sorry! Hey, but, you said Berlin and the year 1933 or did you say Moscow and the year 1918? I am sorry I got onto the wrong time machine!  

   

by syed mahdi (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 126 comments) on Friday, August 10, 2007 at 4:33:11 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Obama may choose Monsanto's GE-nightmare over an organic human vision by Linn Cohen-Cole

The Coming of the Second Great Depression? Posted by Nathan White

Go To Top 50 Most Popular