|
|
,
Add to My Group(s)
Add to My Group(s)
By John Carey (about the author)
Become a Fan -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)
So now Thailand has a Muslim leader.
Gen. Sonthi Boonyaratglin, army commander in chief and an ally of the royal palace, ran the coup. The coup-makers wore the monarchy's traditional colors, and the king later endorsed Sonthi's transitional government.
When he became Army Chief of Staff, Boonyaratglin claimed that he would take a "new and effective" approach to the Muslim terror crisis in the south a problem that has all of the attributes of a low-intensity civil war.
Now we know his definition of a new and effective approach.
International organizations such as Human Rights Watch condemned Sonthi's actions. Former prime minister Chuan Leekpai announced, "As politicians, we do not support any kind of coup but . . . [but] Thaksin has caused the crisis."
And some wonder if this new government will be as corrupt as the old. "There's absolutely no system of checking and control now and so we're very concerned that they will line their pockets and spend our money in the way they want," said Ji Giles Ungpakorn, associate professor of political science at Chulalongkorn University.
"Military regimes in the past have been incredibly corrupt," said Ungpakorn.
According to the International Herald Tribune, Thailand produces a large share of the world's computer hard drives, is the world's largest rice exporter, has a thriving automotive industry and hosts an average of a million tourists each month.
Professor Ungpakorn said, "Decisions are being made by people carrying guns who were never elected."
"Whether you liked Thaksin - and I never supported him or voted for him -- he was elected. What's happening now is worse than under Thaksin from a moral, a democratic and an economic point of view," Ungpakorn said in a telephone interview.
Before the crisis started early this year, Thailand's politics seemed to be operating on perfectly. After nearly 15 years of civilian rule, the country had built a vibrant democracy. The nation was operating under a 1997 reform-minded constitution hailed as one of the most progressive in the region.
There are those that say any form of democracy is better than some other alternative: like a coup and a military government.
We spoke to Thanh Trang Nguyen, a former professor and Vice President of the University of Hue in Vietnam before the Communist takeover. "The coup d'etat last week was a step backward for democracy in Thailand," he told us."Maybe it was true that the prior premier was very corrupt, but he was democratically elected. The Thai people have the right to replace him, but it has to be done in a democratic manner, as their Constitution so directed," said Nguyen.
No shots were fired in the coup, no blood was spilled and initially it seemed Thais welcomed the change.
This week, in a crude effort to make all things seem normal, Thailand's military mounted a charm campaign. Soldiers were told to smile more and a former beauty queen began appearing on Thai TV to make announcement.
"The real issue is not having basic freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press," said Ungpakorn, who helped form the Network Against the Coup d'Etat. "We don't have basic human rights. They can parade a hundred beauty queens but without these freedoms, we don't have anything."
Become a Fan -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)
Gen. Sonthi Boonyaratglin, army commander in chief and an ally of the royal palace, ran the coup. The coup-makers wore the monarchy's traditional colors, and the king later endorsed Sonthi's transitional government.
When he became Army Chief of Staff, Boonyaratglin claimed that he would take a "new and effective" approach to the Muslim terror crisis in the south a problem that has all of the attributes of a low-intensity civil war.
Now we know his definition of a new and effective approach.
International organizations such as Human Rights Watch condemned Sonthi's actions. Former prime minister Chuan Leekpai announced, "As politicians, we do not support any kind of coup but . . . [but] Thaksin has caused the crisis."
And some wonder if this new government will be as corrupt as the old. "There's absolutely no system of checking and control now and so we're very concerned that they will line their pockets and spend our money in the way they want," said Ji Giles Ungpakorn, associate professor of political science at Chulalongkorn University.
"Military regimes in the past have been incredibly corrupt," said Ungpakorn.
According to the International Herald Tribune, Thailand produces a large share of the world's computer hard drives, is the world's largest rice exporter, has a thriving automotive industry and hosts an average of a million tourists each month.
Professor Ungpakorn said, "Decisions are being made by people carrying guns who were never elected."
"Whether you liked Thaksin - and I never supported him or voted for him -- he was elected. What's happening now is worse than under Thaksin from a moral, a democratic and an economic point of view," Ungpakorn said in a telephone interview.
Before the crisis started early this year, Thailand's politics seemed to be operating on perfectly. After nearly 15 years of civilian rule, the country had built a vibrant democracy. The nation was operating under a 1997 reform-minded constitution hailed as one of the most progressive in the region.
There are those that say any form of democracy is better than some other alternative: like a coup and a military government.
We spoke to Thanh Trang Nguyen, a former professor and Vice President of the University of Hue in Vietnam before the Communist takeover. "The coup d'etat last week was a step backward for democracy in Thailand," he told us."Maybe it was true that the prior premier was very corrupt, but he was democratically elected. The Thai people have the right to replace him, but it has to be done in a democratic manner, as their Constitution so directed," said Nguyen.
No shots were fired in the coup, no blood was spilled and initially it seemed Thais welcomed the change.
This week, in a crude effort to make all things seem normal, Thailand's military mounted a charm campaign. Soldiers were told to smile more and a former beauty queen began appearing on Thai TV to make announcement.
"The real issue is not having basic freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press," said Ungpakorn, who helped form the Network Against the Coup d'Etat. "We don't have basic human rights. They can parade a hundred beauty queens but without these freedoms, we don't have anything."
http://peace-and-freedom.blogspot.com/
John E. Carey is the former president of International Defense Consultants, Inc.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
Comments
The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.
This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.
| No comments |