We've seen the infamous Georgia voter ID law, which Department of Justice lawyers said was unconstitutional and would disenfranchise African-American and elderly voters, pushed through by higher ranking officials at the DOJ. And why? Because it was part of the ongoing conspiracy to suppress minority and impoverished voters. When U.S. District Judge Harold L. Murphy issued an injunction against the law, he likened it to a Jim Crow-era poll tax that required residents, most of them black, to pay back taxes before voting.
We've seen the ReTHUGlican party ranting and raving about voter fraud, and how voter fraud is out of control. Yet the New York Times reported that the twice unelected "Bush administration's five-year crackdown on voter fraud has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections. The Justice Department has charged only 120 people, most of them Democrats, and gained only 86 convictions, with many of those charged having mistakenly filled out registration forms or misunderstood eligibility rules." And according to the Times, "the push to prosecute voter fraud figured in removals of at least two United States attorneys whom Republican politicians or party officials criticized for failing to pursue cases. Within the Justice Department, career lawyers clashed with political appointees over protecting voters' rights, leading to the filing of some cases which baffled federal judges."
Then of course we've learned from Greg Palast about the vote caging emails, and the effort spearheaded by Tim Griffin to strip as many Democratic voters from the rolls as possible. These illegal activities disenfranchised scores of thousands of voters, including men and women who are serving in the armed forces. Way to support the troops!
We've learned about that tireless defender against voter fraud, Hans von Spakovsky, who, according to McClatchy News, "blocked career lawyers from filing at least three lawsuits charging local and county governments with violating the voting rights of African-Americans and other minorities."
We've learned from Dan Rather Reports' "The Trouble with Touch Screens" that Election Systems and Software (ES&S) has been making shoddy, tenth rate voting machines under sweatshop conditions in the Philippines, and that these machines may have altered the outcome of multiple elections.
And we've learned from Brad Friedman of BradBlog... well, we've learned so much from Brad. He's one of the very greatest citizen journalists working in America today. Just recently, we can add to the very long list of vital information Brad has exposed with the revelation that "ES&S is in trouble, again, in California. They appear to have sold uncertified AutoMark voting systems to counties and those systems were used in recent elections."
Also from BradBlog, "on a recent Tuesday in August, several days after California Secretary of State Debra Bowen's pronouncement of decertification and then new, restrictive recertification of Diebold, Inc., voting systems, ten officers of the company simultaneously sold off some 10,379 shares of stock at a near 52-week high for the troubled company."
And again from BradBlog, "two Ohio activists have discovered that e-voting machines made by Election Systems and Software and used across the country produce time-stamped paper trails that permit the reconstruction of an election's results--including allowing voter names to be matched to their actual votes." So much for the secret ballot, huh?
These are things we've learned about more recently, in the past few months. And this information has confirmed the existence of the conspiracy that I've known about for years. And I saw that conspiracy in action in Columbus, Ohio, in November of 2004.
Q. You're referring, of course, to the last Presidential election. What were you doing in Ohio?
A. In October of 2004, a friend told me that he knew a guy who was planning to go to Ohio, rent a van and volunteer to drive people to the polls on election day. I was inspired by this and I thought I can do something like that. I had gone to college at Ohio State in Columbus, so I contacted the Ohio Democratic Party and volunteered to work in Columbus getting out the vote.
I arrived on Saturday evening before the election. Sunday morning I went to the campaign headquarters and I was given a list of registered Democratic voters, and on Sunday afternoon and all day Monday I went door to door, making sure people knew that the election was in fact on Tuesday (it sounds basic, but there was a lot of disinformation out there; I saw a flyer saying "Republicans vote on Tuesday, Democrats vote on Wednesday"), made sure they knew where their polling place was, and arranged rides to and from the polls for anyone who needed it.
On Election Day, I was assigned to "observation." I was given a city map and a list of 6 precincts they wanted me to visit, observe what was happening, and report back to Democratic headquarters.
I went to the one suburban precinct on the list, a wealthy suburb, mostly Republican, and I saw 8 voting machines at the precinct, 2 of which were in use, and the other 6 standing open, ready and waiting. No lines, no crowd, no confusion and clear signs. Even for someone like me who hadn't been in Columbus for decades, it was very easy to find the polling place.
Q. Then, what happened?
A. I went to the five other precincts on the list - all poor, inner-city, heavily Democratic precincts, with mostly African American residents. None of those five inner-city Democratic precincts had more than 2 voting machines. Lines were hours long at each of these precincts. Lines went out the door - and it was a cold and rainy November day. People stood out in the cold and rain for hours waiting to vote - and most of the faces had brown skin.
Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which exists for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. We aim to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Electronic (computerized) voting systems are simply antithetical to democratic principles.
CER set up a lending library to achieve the widespread distribution of the DVD Invisible Ballots: A temptation for electronic vote fraud. Within eighteen months, the project had distributed over 3200 copies across the country and beyond. CER now concentrates on group showings, OpEd pieces, articles, reviews, interviews, discussion sessions, networking, conferences, anything that promotes awareness of this critical problem. Joan has been Election Integrity Editor for OpEdNews since December, 2005.
There is one part of this fellow's opinions that bother me. He has a myopic viewpoint where certain laws and practices are directed to eliminate Democrat votes. This is not only counter-productive, it is erroneous.
The federal motor-voter bill was pushed by Bill Clinton and Al Gore. Did they want to eliminate minority votes? Both Democrats and Republicans want to control outcomes. Their main target is third-parties. They do this through ballot access laws which stack the deck against them. Both Democrats and Republicans have supported technological expenditures on voting "reforms".
By targeting Republicans, Steve is alienating any of them reading his comments. Everyone should be interested in transparent, secure, verifiable elections. Because he throws the bulk of his suspicion toward corporations and republicans, he draws suspicion towards himself. Even if he doesn't have a specific agenda, he gives the appearance that it might not be a good idea to support his very good conclusions. One wonders what he is really after. If he doesn't like republicans, maybe his solutions would be bad for Republicans.
I'm not a Republican but when somebody makes such targeted comments, I am always going to raise an eyebrow or two.
For instance, in the democratic precincts of Ohio that Steve Heller visited, what is the party affiliation of those running the counties and precincts? Which precincts specifically did he observe?
Again, I am not defending the republicans. I just think that the democrats are as culpable as the republicans. Just look at the Iraq war and the Patriot act. Nobody forced them to vote for either, but they did overwhelmingly. The voting issue is too important to demagogue. We need republicans to get on board.
RF
by
Joan Brunwasser (164 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 634 comments)
on Sunday, August 26, 2007 at 9:59:45 PM
thanks for your comment. while i am not one to let the dems off lightly, the actual computerized vote manipulation seems to be very one-sided. the corporations are not just republican, but often very right wing and the 'errors' seem to overwhelmingly favor republican candidates. the combination cannot be coincidence - that strains credulity.
regardless of who is at fault, it's another good reason to have a system that can be monitored from soup to nuts. that way, we don't have to trust anyone. as Reagan said, "trust but verify". wise words.
by
Joan Brunwasser (164 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 634 comments)
on Sunday, August 26, 2007 at 10:03:32 PM
electorate and politicians asked to trust technology
Both sides are working together. That there are two ideologically different parties is the illusion. It's good cop bad cop. They both want to stay in power forever. So they do what they can to lock out the third parties.
On this issue, it's about money. They created this market. They were corrupted by the money from lobbyists. Both sides share the responsibility for the mess we're in.
I don't know if you saw this article, but I bring up some of the same points you are making.
are equally culpable in voter suppression and disenfranchisement. That is just not true.
This interview series uses MCM's book "Fooled Again" as a jumping off point, and Mr. Miller's book goes into great detail and gives documented evidence about the Republican efforts to subvert democracy by subverting our elections for the last 3 election cycles. Hence most of my comments are about that issue.
I agree that all Americans and all political parties need to work together to destroy the very concept of private corporations running our elections in secret with secret machines and secret software. The only thing secret about our elections should be the secret ballot.
BUT... in terms of voter suppression and the on-going conspiracy to supress minority and impoverished voters... that entire mess is to be laid at the feet of the Republican party. To say Dems have had a roll in these activities is just simply false.
by
Steve Heller (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 35 comments)
on Monday, August 27, 2007 at 11:14:41 AM
"are equally culpable in voter suppression and disenfranchisement. That is just not true."
It is absolutely true. There have been electronic and mechanical machines for as long as I can remember. These have been purchased by officials in both Republican and Democrat states and counties.
Are democrats so stupid that they are being tricked by republican minorities? Or could it be that manipulation of election results benefits either party?
by
Rick Fisk (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 28 comments)
on Monday, August 27, 2007 at 3:54:34 PM
If you insist that the Democratic party is as culpable in voter suppression and disenfranchisement of minority and impoverished voters as Republicans are, nothing I can say will change your mind.All I can do is remind you, and everyone else on this thread, that the jumping off point for this series of interviews Joan is conducting is MCM's book "Fooled Again."Read that book, and if you still feel that Dems are as responsible for voter suppression and disenfranchisement of minority and impoverished voters as Republicans are, then I will have to believe you are a true kool-aid drinker.
There have been electronic and mechanical machines for as long as I can remember. These have been purchased by officials in both Republican and Democrat states and counties.
Voting machines, machines owned by private corporations that run our elections in secret using secret machines and secret software, have not been around for as long as you can remember unless you can't remember back before the 1990s.And, voter suppression and disenfranchisement of minority and impoverished voters is a separate issue from the secret machines and their secret software.
Are democrats so stupid that they are being tricked by republican minorities?Or could it be that manipulation of election results benefits either party?
See Joan's comment to your original post: "the actual computerized vote manipulation seems to be very one-sided. the corporations are not just republican, but often very right wing and the 'errors' seem to overwhelmingly favor republican candidates. the combination cannot be coincidence - that strains credulity."
Well said, Joan.
by
Steve Heller (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 35 comments)
on Monday, August 27, 2007 at 5:53:49 PM
"If you insist that the Democratic party is as culpable in voter suppression and disenfranchisement of minority and impoverished voters as Republicans are, nothing I can say will change your mind. "
No, there is absolutely something you could do to change my mind. Provide some evidence that only republicans have benefitted from the machines.
I can remember way further back then 1990 and I can assure you that there have been mechanical or electronic machines used in elections before 1990.
The problem with electronic ballot counters is exactly the same as the mechanical counters.
At least the mechanical machines could be verified by a hand count though hard to do and not often done.
You aren't somebody who can merely drop a few key phrases and expect people to believe you. You have a criminal record. Perhaps the ends justified the means, but you stole communications between a law firm and their client. There are a good number of democrat and republican activists who find the government's actions in this regard to be very, very troubling. At guantanamo, for instance, CIA agents are posing as lawyers and then using materials they gather against the prisoners. Interfering with legal privilege is a serious matter.
To the law firm's credit, it was alerting its client that it was breaking the law.
If you are going to expect to be held out as a hero and credible, you are going to have to at least make an effort to sound credible. As somebody else pointed out, merely throwing around ad hominem isn't going to cut it. You are going to need something more solid than unsubstantiated allegations.
What democrats in office are championing the paper ballot solution? How many republican office holders are on-board?
How many republican officials do you think will be willing to help you now?
by
Rick Fisk (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 28 comments)
on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 12:24:18 AM
If you are going to expect to be held out as a hero.
No way, never in any way have I expected to be a hero. I'm insulted that you'd write that, and of all the words I've written and spoken about my case or myself, I challenge you to point out anything that would indicate I expected to be thought of as hero of any kind.
Again, read Miller's book, do some research on your own.
And now, I'm done debating you. I kinda think you're a concern troll anyway.
by
Steve Heller (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 35 comments)
on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 8:02:17 AM
Thought you might be interested in the response from one of my list readers. Who knows, maybe more people will come forward.
Peace,
MS
-----
Subject: RE: Exclusive Interview with "Diebold Whistleblower" Steve Heller by Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity ed., OpEdNews
Hello M -
I'm glad to be on one or more of your Email lists lately...
I have a young cousin who worked for Diebold during 2004 and 6 I"m told, and was looking for the way out and onto a different job; I'm going to send this to her aunt who is my 1st cousin.
Sheila
by
Joan Brunwasser (164 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 634 comments)
on Monday, August 27, 2007 at 6:28:29 AM
CER is a tiny group based in the Chicago suburbs which engages in election reform and which supported my drive to educate the public about the perils of electronic voting, originally through my "Invisible Ballots" lending library and more recently, through my writings and attendance at conferences.
by
Joan Brunwasser (164 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 634 comments)
on Sunday, August 26, 2007 at 10:22:51 PM
I was disappointed with this interview. I was hoping to pass it around. In particular, to someone who recently asked me how is it possible that if the voting machine companies were fixing elections no one from the voting machine companies have come forward.
I was hoping to learn about the legal documents that he exposed, and how they proved (if they did in fact prove) that Diebold was engaged in conspiratorial behavior. And how he was treated by the press, the democrats, the company, and the courts. None of that came out.
SF
by
Joan Brunwasser (164 articles, 3538 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 634 comments)
on Sunday, August 26, 2007 at 10:24:13 PM
The crime I committed was to violate attorney-client privilege. If I were to discuss the documents and their content, I'd be committing the same crime, so I can't and won't discuss the documents in any way. You might be able to find more information via google search...
I never said that the voting machine companies are fixing elections. I have said that allowing private corporations to use their secret machines and secret software to run our elections for us in secret is just about the stupidest thing a democratic republic can do to itself. I have talked about the various testing that has proven without any doubt that these machines are inaccurate and unreliable, and the overwhelming evidence that the flaws in these machines have changed the outcomes of elections (see Florida's 13th Cong. District race from 2006).
Several employees of the voting machine companies have indeed come forward and exposed various information. Dan Rather's recent report on ES&S's machines and their manufacturing plant in the Philippines had several ex-employees exposing the shoddy quality of the ES&S machines. There's been a lot more, I suggest you check BradBlog.com and Bev Harris' site, blackboxvoting.org, for more information.
For more information about my case, I suggest a visit to my legal defense fund website, especially the "press" and the "news" pages.
Thank you for your comment, RF. A couple of things I want to say in response.
It is a simple fact that in the past 3 election cycles, it is the Republicans - not the Democrats - that have engaged in an on-going conspiracy to subvert American elections.Don't take my word for it.Read Mark Crispin Miller's book "Fooled Again" which goes into very specific details of this still on-going conspiracy.
As Mr. Miller's book makes clear, in recent years it is the Republican party that has specifically and by design set out to undermine free and fair elections in America.They've been very successful at it, so much so that the man serving his second term in the White House has yet to be elected.It's important to understand exactly what has been happening, and if Republicans are alienated by learning the facts about what their party has been doing to American elections, good.Maybe it will motivate them to either switch parties or work for change from within their own party.In terms of feeling alienated, our twice un-elected president and his war of choice, his casual shredding of our constitutional liberties, his disdain for the rule of law, and a host of other issues too long to list here, has made me - and, according to polls, at this point about 70% of the American people - feel plenty alienated from our own government.That alienation has motivated me to get more active.So I hope any Republicans who actually do feel "alienated" by the facts of what their party has been doing will also get motivated to get active on behalf of clean, fair, secure, and accurate elections.
Comparing the Motor Voter law, which allows people to register to vote when they get their driver's licenses, to the kind of voter suppression and disenfranchisement techniques the Republicans have been engaging in, seems silly to me.Regardless of who uses motor voter to register, the law is, by definition, an EN-franchisement law, while the Republican party's behavior is clearly intended to DIS-enfranchise low income and minority voters.Your comparison doesn't make sense.
You wrote:"One wonders what he is really after. If he doesn't like republicans, maybe his solutions would be bad for Republicans."
If you wonder what I'm "really after" I'll tell you that my only agenda is to get clean elections.And my solutions probably WOULD be bad for the Republican party, because I believe they actually lost the last 2 presidential elections.If we had clean elections in whic
