 |
Add to My Group
"Confessions of an Economic Hit Man"
By Joan Brunwasser (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
Both had just died in fiery crashes. Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We Economic Hit Men failed to bring Roldós and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the C.I.A.-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in... Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we've been very successful. We've built the largest empire in the history of the world. It's been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It's only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.
The interview continues, and Goodman asks, "How closely did you work with the World Bank?"
Very, very closely with the World Bank. The World Bank provides most of the money that's used by economic hit men, it and the I.M.F. But when 9/11 struck, I had a change of heart. I knew the story had to be told because what happened at 9/11 is a direct result of what the economic hit men are doing. And the only way that we're going to feel secure in this country again and that we're going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we've put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that. I believe the World Bank and other institutions can be turned around and do what they were originally intended to do, which is help reconstruct devastated parts of the world. Help genuinely help poor people. There are twenty-four thousand people starving to death every day. We can change that.
I applaud Perkins's coming forward now, although his scruples didn't prevent 20 years of silence when disclosure might have been more timely. I urge everyone to read this horribly fascinating view of our recent history and trade policies masquerading as foreign policy.
I would like to draw a link between the unseemly alliance between Big Business and the highest echelons of our government and the need for meaningful reform on various fronts. While the 2006 elections were surely a repudiation of W's policies and administration, the loving embrace between corporations and our government continues to affect us indirectly every day. I'm referring to the corporate media and its inability or unwillingness to cover stories of crucial importance to its public. If you are confident that major outlets are giving sufficient attention to the issues of the day, go to Project Censored at www.projectcensored.org. Distorted election coverage was #3 on the top 25 censored stories of 2006. Not only do we need media reform, but campaign finance reform as well. Corporate influence is like a tapeworm in the heart of our democracy. The body might still be upright, but this hidden menace can kill while remaining out of sight.
This book gave me a lot to think about. One image that came to mind was the bull in the china shop. Indigenous peoples, delicate ecosystems, and the structure and social fabric of each country are all in harm's way because of America's raging greed and power. I recently saw the movie Blood Diamond, which depicts how diamonds have created civil war, destruction and death for the people of Africa. One of the characters in the movie says, ironically, "It's a good thing we don't have oil. Then, we'd really be in trouble." As he stands amidst his burning village, filled with violence and death, it is quite a powerful statement.
Is the West's hunger for consumer goods the chief cause for globablization? While I think it is definitely a factor, and recommend mindful shopping as a small-scale antidote, I think that it is the unquenchable corporate thirst for profits that really drives this train. (For more on this topic, see my last OpEd piece on this subject entitled "Crocs, Costco and the Mindful Shopper")
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_joan_bru_061230_crocs_2c_costco_and_th.htm. Perkins, at one point in his book, seems to place the blame squarely on American consumers. But I think that is self-serving on his part. The most insatiable shopper could never, in a lifetime of sprees and binges, "accomplish" what Perkins did during his tenure as an economic hit man. He admitted that his chief skill was that he was a good writer and adept in the art of persuasion. In another context, what was done to these countries could be construed as entrapment, both morally and legally.
The N.S.A. chose well. Perkins was the right man for the job. His father was a teacher at a prestigious prep school in rural New Hampshire, causing his son to be ever conscious of the social divide. When young John joined the student body, he never felt like an equal, and it rankled badly. The same was true when he went to college. His inferiority complex and resulting desire to succeed made him the perfect candidate for his ignoble profession. He was honored to be selected, to be respected, to have such responsibility and power.
And, it was so very lucrative. Long after Perkins' scruples were awakened, he did nothing. Even when he had broken away and decided to write a book about his former activities, more than 20 years elapsed before it was ultimately published. Perkins admits that part of the delay was purely financial. He was offered another job where he got paid excessively for essentially doing nothing, the only caveat being that he was forbidden to write anything that would reflect poorly on the companies with which he dealt. He was a willing, if guilt-ridden participant. So, when he tries to shift the blame, I understand the impulse but reject his argument. Yes, our buying patterns need to change. But this is about far more than that. The unspoken, unratified national priorities carried out in our name need to change.
Several times, Perkins alludes to sitting in front of a blank computer screen. This is a grownup version of the tabula rasa the blank slate that we are at birth. We have, within reason, the ability to choose the path we will take, and the moral compass that will direct us. The same is true right now, at this very moment. The public can continue to be apathetic about the sad state our country is in. It's very comfortable to complain and whine from the sidelines, and there's lots to whine about. And, there are certainly many others doing exactly the same thing namely nothing. Or, people can choose to rouse themselves from their stupor, choose an issue, and get busy working on it. There are plenty of good people out there doing the same. I happen to think that efforts for election integrity pay the largest dividends because the health of our elections mirrors the state of our democracy. Without fair elections, nothing else we want will be possible. It's as simple as that.
If you want something easy to do on your first tentative step away from the couch, send a letter to your member of Congress to amend the Holt Bill, HR 550, so that it can become suitable for passage.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_nancy_to_061229_dear_american_patrio.htm
Mark my words. Legislation will pass this session to try to deal with the election mess we're in. Momentum and public will say so. But, the success lies in the details. An unworkable bill will guarantee future compromised elections, which we can ill afford. Now, right now before Congress convenes, is the time to get a message out to your representatives that lip service is not enough. We want free, fair, transparent, secure, and accurate elections, and we want them now!
Send the letter to your members of Congress and then pass it along to everyone you know. If you have a large network, it still shouldn't take you more than 20 minutes, tops. If you have only a few friends, relatives, neighbors or co-workers, it won't take more than 10 minutes. You could do it during the commercials of one TV show. You'll feel good about it, and you'll save yourself from too many runs to the refrigerator. Now, that's what I call a win-win situation.
1 | 2
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
by FOREIGN POLICY MAGAZINE
$3.99
Number of pages:
Publisher:
by FOREIGN POLICY MAGAZINE
$3.99
Number of pages:
Publisher:
by FOREIGN POLICY MAGAZINE
$3.99
Number of pages:
Publisher:
by Foreign Policy
$2.49
Number of pages:
Publisher:
| 19 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article? 
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0) Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |
