Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (4 comments)

People Worry That Bush Could Easily Implement a Police State. But They Forget to Ask Whether He Has ALREADY Done So

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

However, Corsi and everyone else is missing the bigger point: Bush has already declared a national emergency. Indeed, Bush declared one in September of 2001, and has renewed the state of emergency each year up to the present.

And we are likely already under martial law via the Continuity of Government plans. (See this, this, this and this).

So what Does NSPD-51 Really Do?

While I have no hard facts which explain why Bush issued NSPD-51, I have a theory. Specifically, I believe that NSPD-51 may have been issued for three reasons:

(1) To consolidate all governmental power in the White House. For example, the Washington Post states "former Bush administration officials said the directive formalizes a shift of authority away from the Department of Homeland Security to the White House". And the Boston Globe states that NSPD-51 has the effect of "moving such doomsday planning for the first time from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to officials inside the White House" and that "security specialists and administration officials said the new policy centralizes control of such planning in the White House");

(2) To get around the provisions of the National Emergency Act, which limits the ability of the White House to seize power, and requires certain notifications to Congress; and

(3) To create a red herring or smokescreen by phrasing a national emergency as a hypothetical, future event, when -- in fact -- America has continuously been in a state of national emergency from 9/11/01 to the present.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

GW, I am by richard on Tuesday, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:46:12 PM
i second your emotion by Wolfie on Wednesday, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:56:06 AM
GW: The signs are everywhere ... by Joann on Wednesday, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:32:51 PM
re needing to declare a National Emergency. by Rae on Thursday, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:18:39 PM