OpEdNews Op Eds

People Worry That Bush Could Easily Implement a Police State. But They Forget to Ask Whether He Has ALREADY Done So

      (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 8941
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -

However, Corsi and everyone else is missing the bigger point: Bush has already declared a national emergency. Indeed, Bush declared one in September of 2001, and has renewed the state of emergency each year up to the present.

And we are likely already under martial law via the Continuity of Government plans. (See this, this, this and this).

So what Does NSPD-51 Really Do?

While I have no hard facts which explain why Bush issued NSPD-51, I have a theory. Specifically, I believe that NSPD-51 may have been issued for three reasons:

(1) To consolidate all governmental power in the White House. For example, the Washington Post states "former Bush administration officials said the directive formalizes a shift of authority away from the Department of Homeland Security to the White House". And the Boston Globe states that NSPD-51 has the effect of "moving such doomsday planning for the first time from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to officials inside the White House" and that "security specialists and administration officials said the new policy centralizes control of such planning in the White House");

(2) To get around the provisions of the National Emergency Act, which limits the ability of the White House to seize power, and requires certain notifications to Congress; and

- Advertisement -

(3) To create a red herring or smokescreen by phrasing a national emergency as a hypothetical, future event, when -- in fact -- America has continuously been in a state of national emergency from 9/11/01 to the present.

- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as Washington's biographies show - he wasn't a (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Top Financial Experts Say World War 3 Is Coming -- Unless We Stop It

Indonesian Health Minister Says Swine Flu Might Have Been Man-Made | Epidemiologists and Virologists Need to Weigh In

Obama Is Considering Doing Something Even Bush Didn't Try: "Preventive Detention" of People Who Will Never Get a Trial

How To Solve the Economic Crisis

The Four Reasons the Mainstream Media Is Worthless

5 Reasons that Corporate Media Coverage is Pro-War

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

buying your argument. Seems to be a 'done deal... by richard on Tuesday, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:46:12 PM
i feel lower than a dachshund doing deep knee bend... by Wolfie on Wednesday, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:56:06 AM
Quite frankly, I think when Pelosi was first ... by Joann on Wednesday, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:32:51 PM
Bush doesn't need to declare a national emerge... by Rae on Thursday, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:18:39 PM