Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (2 comments)

The Perfect Crime: Why The Firings Matter

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Both Cunningham and Lewis took bribes from a company called MZM that re-furnished Dick Cheney’s office for $140-thousand dollars. MZM then bought a $140K yacht for Duke Cunningham. Attorney Lam was getting too close to the Vice President. Gonzales to Cheney: No problemo.

U.S. Attorney John McKay in Washington was asked to file charges of voter fraud against Democrats in the 2004 election of Governor Christine Gregoire. McKay found no evidence of wrongdoing, so he got axed.

U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins of Arkansas was canned and replaced with an inexperienced lawyer (Tim Griffin) who worked for Karl Rove as part of a national plan to make it difficult for certain Americans to vote. (Vote purging is the new “literacy test” to keep African Americans and other liberals from the polls.) Oh yeah, and Cummins was also investigating Republican Governor Roy Blunt (Missouri) so he was definitely on the short list to get his walking papers.

Isn’t it interesting that New Mexico, Nevada, California, Washington, and Arkansas all have prominent Democrats in Congress, and are considered pivotal states for the 2008 Election? Remember Ohio and Florida?

U.S. Attorney Paul K. Charlton of Arizona was fired after starting investigation of two Republican representatives right before the election.

U.S. Attorney Sharon Eubanks wasn’t fired, but she was pressured by the Bush Department of Justice to go easy on Big Tobacco, and she finally resigned in frustration after 22 years on the job. She is asking for an investigation to go beyond the Fired Eight.

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of Illinois still has his job, but after sending Cheney aide “Scooter” Libby to prison, his performance was ranked as “not distinguished.”

Fortunately, the House and the Senate repealed one line in Patriot Act II that allowed the Attorney General to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation. A bone, perhaps, but a step in the right direction.

So what?

So why does it matter? Who cares if these folks got fired “at the President’s pleasure?”

The whole idea of an independent legal system is that justice is blind. The law is supposed to treat you equally, no matter if you are a Democrat or a Republican.

But these attorneys were fired by the War Profiteer Administration (WPA) because they were prosecuting fellow Republicans (a big no-no) or else not prosecuting atheistic flag-burning gay Democrats. In some cases, they were removed to obstruct an ongoing or potential investigation.

No wonder people have lost faith in justice.

Many other more serious crimes have been committed by this Administration. But if this is what it takes to overturn the rotting log and see the creepy crawling insects eating its insides out, then bring it on, in the words of Flight Suit Boy.

James “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny” Madison

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Eric Malone has been writing about politics with a sardonic sense of humor through more than one apocalyptic Administration. He is a subversive dedicated to revolution through thoughtful laughter.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Whether there is no credible evidence of wrong doing? by Butterfly on Tuesday, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:19:52 AM
Credible Evidence by Eric Malone on Thursday, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:03:56 PM