Tags for This Article:

Congress (3105)  Government (3072)  People (2532)  Republican (2073)  Democratic (1767)  Voting (1406)  Rights (1337)  Freedom (1265)  Money (1147)  State (974)  Work (429)  Work (383)  Liberty (334)  Paul-Ron (298)  Libertarian (178)  Charity (86)  Paul Krugman (31) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
October 9, 2007 at 05:34:45

Ron Paul Considers Me an Exception!

by Ed Allison     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Big business is honestly no different. Save the fact that occaisionally Big Business ends up controlling a far too powerful Big Government.

Here me:  No entity is perfect. Government, Business, my friends or family.  I still want them all in my life, as long as they respect me.  

Would you consider that freedom of choice, and freedom of competition are good for you, and good for me. Essentially, it eliminates the perpetuation of failures.  

Do you care about those affected by the failures of government?  Would you accept a failure on the scale of Iraq for your own personal health care without an alternative?  I would like alternatives, and want them for you too. 

I support Ron Paul because he doesn't believe he is the smartest person in the world. I support Ron Paul because he will allow me to choose between competing systems for service (state vs. state, or company vs. government). I believe that choice leads to charity. 

Finally, I believe that you matter as much as me.  And that I matter as much as the 'exception' that so many of these debates seem to highlight... You know these exceptions. "What about this group or that group if you do this or that".

Well, world. I am an exception as well. I belong to a group. The group that works hard, helps people, and believes that Freedom is what we should all be voting for, be we Democrat, Republican, Libertarian or whatever.  I become an "Exception" when a large national government takes from me, and my group, to serve another with force or taxes. 

I ask you this: If you don't support Paul, please don't mislabel him. I support your right to vote against the person I support, and hope you support mine. But Ron Paul is the most indepenant, most honest, most principled person in Congress.

This is the first time I have written such an article.  Ron Paul is the first politician whom I have supported financially in a primary.  If you would agree with me, I encourage you to do all you can.  Write, give, support.  In fact, I encourage you to do this for whichever candidate you support, please just do it honestly, and respectfully.   

Yours in Freedom,

Ed.

 1  |  2

 

I am a 34 year old guy. I work as hard as I can, love as much as I am able, give to things I believe in, and drink alot of milk. Mostly, I respect freedom. I served in the military, and today do what I can to support freedom, dignity and respect to all people.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments

I'm a retired RN and holistic nurse living with my hubby of 42 years in the woods of Upstate NY. I'm also a polio survivor. I have lived long enough to realize that "politician" and "liar" are synonymous.
Nana P.I'm a retired RN and holistic nurse living with my hubby of 42 years in the woods of Upstate NY. I'm also a polio survivor. I have lived long enough to realize that "politician" and "liar" are synonymous.

Not exactly

Ron Paul may profess his belief in indiviual rights with one very big exception....a woman's right to chose whether or not she becomes a mother.  I'm happy for him that he has delivered "over 4000 babies" and I sincerely hope that all of them were wanted, and not the results of violence.... but to trap young girls and women who are victims of sexual assault, is tragic.  In my nursing career, I took care of too many 13 and 14 yr olds who were pregnant victims of mommy's boyfriend! 

by Nana P. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 10 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 7:51:09 AM
 


Just a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
craig dJust a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Yes, Exactly

To the first poster:

First, Ron Paul does not believe that the federal government should ban abortion. He believes the decision should be left to local and state governments. It is not the right of the state to decide such matters.

Second, the issue of abortion is not black and white. There are people who believe, on one extreme, that a fetus is an appendage that is part of a woman's body, and that a woman should have the right to do with her body as she chooses. There are people, on the other extreme, who feel that life begins at conception, and the intentional killing of that life is murder.

Assuming, as you do in your post, that one of these views is pro-liberty and the other is not is irrational. Both sides can argue that they are pro-liberty. However, the only federal position on this issue that is truly pro-liberty is one that does not advocate either, but leaves the decision to the state and local government.

Third, We live in a society. I understand that people have strong regarding particular issues. However, while you may not agree with your neighbor, if you cannot, at the very least, understand your neighbors opinions, than you are part of what is wrong with our country and where it is headed.

by craig d (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:40:01 AM
 


Just a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
craig dJust a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Yes, Exactly

To the first poster:

First, Ron Paul does not believe that the federal government should ban abortion. He believes the decision should be left to local and state governments. It is not the right of the federal government* to decide such matters.

Second, the issue of abortion is not black and white. There are people who believe, on one extreme, that a fetus is an appendage that is part of a woman's body, and that a woman should have the right to do with her body as she chooses. There are people, on the other extreme, who feel that life begins at conception, and the intentional killing of that life is murder.

Assuming, as you do in your post, that one of these views is pro-liberty and the other is not is irrational. Both sides can argue that they are pro-liberty. However, the only federal position on this issue that is truly pro-liberty is one that does not advocate either, but leaves the decision to the state and local government.

Third, We live in a society. I understand that people have strong regarding particular issues. However, while you may not agree with your neighbor, if you cannot, at the very least, understand your neighbors opinions, than you are part of what is wrong with our country and where it is headed.

by craig d (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:40:28 AM
 


Just a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
craig dJust a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Sorry for the double-post

.

by craig d (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:42:42 AM
 


Just a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
craig dJust a guy living in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania

Oh, and another thing...

The sexual assault card is so damn tired. Sexual assault is an awful crime that wreaks havoc to its victims, and should be punished severely under any just society. But, if a person believes that abortion is murder then, clearly, it is still not OK to kill a fetus for the crimes of the father. I am not advocating a particular stance on the issue, but jeez, there are logical arguments on both sides. Once you understand the other side, you begin to realize that there is no right or wrong answer.

by craig d (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 8:56:18 AM
 


I'm a longtime free man and a longtime Ron Paul supporter who voted for him in 1988 and will vote for him this time too. No society in history has survived a continually growing cental government and this one can't either. Either government will shrink or it will overwhelm us just as has happened throughout history. It's beyond my comprehension why anybody would think that we need even one more government program, much less one that emcompasses everybody in the country. Can anybody point to one ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

p hensonI'm a longtime free man and a longtime Ron Paul supporter who voted for him in 1988 and will vote for him this time too. No society in history has survived a continually growing cental government and this one can't either. Either government will shrink or it will overwhelm us just as has happened throughout history. It's beyond my comprehension why anybody would think that we need even one more government program, much less one that emcompasses everybody in the country. Can anybody point to one ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

federal matters

While it's true that Ron Paul is strongly anti-abortion, it's also true that he doesn't advocate passing federal laws based on feelings or opinions. The Constitution does not allow the Federal Government to consider such things as abortion. After all, even if you consider abortion murder, isn't murder a local crime as opposed to a federal one?

by p henson (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 12:03:44 PM
 


I'm a 29 year old male. 
TyI'm a 29 year old male. 

Ron Paul

Abortion is a women's rights issue and is a 9th amendment right. No government whether it be federal, state, or local has any business taking away people's rights. All three levels of government are required to uphold the US Constitution. Ron Paul supports legislation that would redefine life as beginning at conception which would make abortion an act of murder. So stop with this nonsense that Ron Paul doesn't want to ban abortion at the federal level.

The government is corrupt because it is run for the benefit of and controlled by a small elite group of people. It is also corrupt because our constitutional form of government makes the government unaccountable to the people so the government can do pretty much anything it wants to do. What we need is government of, by, and for the people (Direct Democracy).

I don't like Ron Paul for several reasons. Ron Paul opposes separation of church and state. Ron Paul claims to be a constitutionalist but opposes 9th amendment rights and also has failed to support Kucinich bill to impeach Dick Cheney. Ron Paul doesn't publicly support a new investigation of 911. Ron Paul wants to build a fence on the Mexican border and supports deporting anyone who is an undocumented immigrant. Ron Paul supports eliminating taxes on wealthy people and corporations. Ron Paul wants to eliminate social programs. Ron Paul supports subsidies for oil companies. Ron Paul supports oil drilling. Ron Paul supports wasting billions on a Missile Defense System. Ron Paul wants to eliminate the minimum wage and opposes workers rights. Ron Paul supports deregulation of business and privatization of public assets. Ron Paul voted for the bankruptcy bill that benefits creditors and makes it more difficult for people to declare bankruptcy.

I support Dennis Kucinich for president. Dennis Kucinich is the only honest candidate and the only candidate with integrity. Dennis Kucinich supports the rights of ALL people and cares about everyone's well being. Dennis is the only candidate that opposes corporatism and that poses a threat to the ruling class. Dennis is the only candidate that wants to end poverty.

http://www.dennis4president.com

http://www2.kucinich.us/issues

 

by Ty (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 821 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 5:43:43 PM
 


I'm a 29 year old male. 
TyI'm a 29 year old male. 

Murder

Murder is not a local crime. A local crime is something that is only illegal in the local area like in a particular town, city, or county. Last time I checked murder is a crime everywhere in the country and probably everywhere in the world.

 

by Ty (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 821 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 5:53:50 PM
 


Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

W.M.L.Undergraduate degree in political science and philosophy: summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa; with postgraduate work in political economics. Postgraduate degree is a juris doctorate. I am a voracious reader and, although I make no claim to expertise, have self studied in logic, linguistics, theology, theoretical physics, macroeconomics, technical and fundamental market analysis, world history, and many other subjects, which I believed at the time helped explain the world around me.

...

to see more of bio, click on member name

MURDER AND DEMOCRACY

Under the Constitution, the jurisdiction or powers of the federal government are granted to it, all others being reserved to the people or the states. The power to prosecute for murder is not granted the federal government, and hence, it is a local matter to be prosecuted by the states. While the powers granted to the federal government are very limited in the Constitution, over time the power to regulate commerce between the states and the fourteenth amendment granting citizens of every state the same rights as the citizens of the United States have been used to radically expand the police powers of the federal government. This is how we now find ourselves with a giant, bloated federal government that regulates every aspect of our daily lives, when the founders' original intent was that the federal government would have very little impact on the average citizen, and the states would be like little experiments where the best methods of governing would be developed and copied.

As to direct democracy being the best form of government, nothing could be further from the truth. Direct democracy is rule by the mob with no consideration for the rights of individuals and minorities. A Constitutional Republic, on the other hand, like we are suppose to have, but have lost, is a system where democracy prevails only to the point it does not infringe upon the guaranteed rights of individuals or minorities as defined in the Constitution. No pure democracy has ever existed for more than a passing moment because of the inherent instability of majorities, and the radical injustices imposed upon large minorities. After all, 51% can vote to enslave the other 49%. There must be a Constitutional framework guaranteeing fundamental fairness and fundamental rights to individuals and minorities. Thus, a Constitutional Republic fits the mold.

by W.M.L. (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 322 comments) on Tuesday, October 9, 2007 at 6:28:30 PM
 


Atlanta, GA
Thomas VietorAtlanta, GA

Paul is incomplete on abortion

First and foremost. . . abortion is a question of life, before any other question. Thus, I  believe a federal question.

When does life begin? It is NOT a question of "right to choose" if the damn thing is alive. Then it IS murder.

Personally, I'm in favor of limited abortion. I don't think a cell or group of cells has any rights just because it is alive, afterall the cell is alive (logically it couldn't be dead).

However, what separates us humans from all other forms of life is our REASONING capacity. A few cells cannot reason. As soon as it is determined the fetus has a well/enough developed brain to allow for the *capacity* to reason, it should come into FULL PROTECTION of the law. I am no expert, so I don't know WHEN that happens, but I guess it should be around half way through the pregnancy.

That's why it is ok to unplug people who are brain dead or in a "vegetative" state.

by Thomas Vietor (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 20 comments) on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 10:00:43 AM
 

 

10 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Obama Must Appoint a Consumer Protectionist as FDA Commissioner by Stephen Fox

Naomi Wolf Must Watch Video: A Coup Took Place on October 1, 2008 by youtube

BARACK OBAMA On Gandhi's Birthday by Stephen Fox

CBS's Spoiled Poodle Dean Reynolds Bites Obama-- Reports his Plane Smells by Rob Kall

What I Learned At The Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me Out! by Linda Milazzo

The dangerous McCain/Palin character assassination of Obama by Sherman Yellen

Return of the Jedi by Ferdinand

How low can Palin go? by Deb Della Piana

Onward, Christian Soldiers (Redux) by Shirley Bianchi

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

Go To Top 50 Most Popular