Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
February 17, 2007 at 10:36:26

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Why the resistance to 9-11 truth?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Carol Wolman (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

It means looking frankly at our helplessness, our gullibility, our willingness to accept any form of hypocrisy, as long as we are allowed to go on shopping.

It means realizing that Bush controls vast portions of our society- that many people must know that 9-11 was an inside job, and won't step forward and say so, out of bribery, intimidation or both. A few brave souls have spoken up about the "power down" at the towers the week before, the evacuation of building 7 several hours before it, too, was brought down by preplanted demolition charges, the confusion at air traffic control when NORAD failed to intercept the planes that were so far off course- but not many dare to speak out. Why not?

It means realizing that the situation is so dire that we need help from a higher power, and should start praying, as sailors do when the ship is sinking.

Six years after 9-11, We the People are starting to recognize that we, too, have power. Some of us have been praying steadily, and the fruits are starting to show.


We've seen through the lies that took us into Iraq, and understand more about Bush's hypocrisy, and willingness to "fix the facts around the policy" as the Downing Street memo puts it. Osama is another convenient "fact", like WMD's in Iraq.

We've seen that we have been blessed with the internet, with which to hunt for the truth, disseminate it, work with one another to reach new depths of understanding of our situation.

We've come to understand that under our precious Constitution, We the People are sovereign, and don't have to tolerate another King George.

We've won an election, despite all the dirty tricks and voting machine fraud. We've even pushed the incoming Congress to censure Bush.

Our higher power has helped us all along to value truth above convenience, to fight with words rather than guns, to operate out of love for each other and future generations.

Perhaps now we are ready to face the truth about 9-11. The whole "war on terror" is based on 9-11, and is seen for the sham it is, once we realize it was an inside job. Once we do, our outrage will be so great that we will force Congress to impeach Bush and Cheney, the real hijackers.

In the name of the Prince of Peace, Carol Wolman

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
impeach Bush and Cheney

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Carol S. Wolman, MD is a psychiatrist in Northern California. A lifelong peace activist, she is helping to distribute a Peace Plan for the Holy Land- email her for a copy. As the Green candidate for Congress in California District 1 in '08, she (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "9 11 Truth"
The American Truth
by Nick Shelton

$14.99
Lowest New Price $13.38

Number of pages: 224
Publisher: Mill City Press

The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth from 9/11 to Katrina
by Frank Rich

$25.95
Lowest New Price $3.50

Number of pages: 352
Publisher: Penguin Press HC, The

9/11 The Ultimate Truth
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk

$44.99

Number of pages: 430
Publisher: Red Pill Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
107 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

middle management by richard on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 11:33:54 AM
not convinced by francine on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 1:26:32 PM
Overwhelming evidence; you're just not looking at it. by johndoraemi on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 8:33:59 PM
Proof by PrMaine on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 8:39:57 AM
lihop, mihop, evidence..... by richard on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 2:46:02 PM
Wonderful piece Carol!! by Styve on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 2:51:50 PM
The Masses by "Hoss" David P. on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 2:56:52 PM
Operation Mockingbird by richard on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 4:55:49 PM
9/11 Truth is the way to set us Free by Sleeper on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 3:45:15 PM
The Little Conspiracies That Could by David Glenn Cox on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 5:05:02 PM
Not a good strategy... by francine on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 5:31:30 PM
Musical and Cognitive Dissonance by CasaZaza on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 8:22:31 PM
Need a lot more links and facts. by Steven Leser on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 6:31:21 PM
I'd like to see some "engineering proof". by jpsmith123 on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 8:12:35 PM
Is that distant drumming I here? by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:30:40 AM
ROTFL! by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:50:56 AM
Stay calm laddy by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 6:11:24 PM
Does your Mommy know you're at the computer again? by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 5:26:29 PM
Do you really believe by ardee D. on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 6:00:47 PM
Apparently you're looking in the mirror as you type. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 7:06:24 PM
You are a proven idiot by ardee D. on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 6:45:48 PM
ROTFL! by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:53:42 AM
Maybe by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 1:04:54 PM
Maybe, still, it is weird, dontcha think? by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 8:02:51 AM
--IF-- by johndoraemi on Saturday, Feb 17, 2007 at 8:42:02 PM
Conspiracy nuts versus wingnuts? by francine on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 7:22:26 AM
Debunking Francine by richard on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:58:27 AM
Excellent job, Medicis!! by Styve on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 3:43:17 PM
What it Will Take by "Hoss" David P. on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 7:55:03 AM
9/11, Bush by Bob Gormley on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:24:48 AM
The Religion Of Television by JacksonHolly on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 1:06:00 PM
Engineering Proof by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 1:10:15 PM
Sorry, the intended link was... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:34:55 PM
There is also this by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 1:19:54 PM
What "Engineering Proof" are you talking about? by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:25:23 PM
Both links I reference the engineering work of an NIST Civil by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:47:36 PM
Dr. Sunder provides a *theory*, not a proof. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 4:39:56 PM
Where are the citations for what you say? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:04:04 PM
The simple physics involved here is self-evident. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 6:01:43 PM
I actually took both High school and several semesters of by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:43:24 PM
Then you should get your money back. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 5:28:12 AM
No, I shouldn't, YOU should stick to your field by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:34:55 AM
Now you're just being contrary. by jpsmith123 on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 4:51:07 PM
Fluff or science? by richard on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:19:04 PM
Made up data? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:25:04 PM
The reports I cited both reference a licensed civil engineer by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 2:44:21 PM
Sources.... by richard on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:48:28 PM
After all of this worthless reposting, you still have no by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:36:58 AM
I'm delighted with the discussion, but... by Carol Wolman on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 3:23:16 PM
Where are the citations for what you say? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 4:14:03 PM
I'm not the one making the extraordinary claims. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:05:33 PM
You are still not getting it. You need sources by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:13:04 PM
Here is the complete analysis of the steel by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 5:43:27 PM
I don't see anything in there that supports Sunder's theory. by jpsmith123 on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 7:12:25 PM
YOUR OWN EVIDENCE BETRAYS YOU. by johndoraemi on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 3:37:18 AM
No, it doesn't by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:54:07 AM
Number 12 is carefully crafted to avoid truth by Sleeper on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 8:17:24 PM
Its the 10 seconds by Sleeper on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 6:08:13 PM
Physics by Maxwell on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 9:18:09 PM
Who supports your theory who has expertise in this field? by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:02:47 PM
Hypothesis by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 9:44:30 AM
Shipfitter Experience by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 9:54:43 PM
You people are nitpickers by Carol Wolman on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:34:20 PM
Nitpickers?!?! by Steven Leser on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 10:55:17 PM
yes, nitpickers by Carol Wolman on Sunday, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:43:07 PM
Engineers Are NOT Perfect Beings by Mac McKinney on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:18:52 AM
nitpicking is avoiding by Carol Wolman on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:36:16 AM
I read your links and many others by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 9:44:11 AM
Why? by Geraldo on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:17:40 PM
Reality?!?! by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:00:07 PM
Fond farewell to the Spoiler-in-chief? by Geraldo on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 7:13:31 AM
Conspiracy obfuscating the conspiracy of the conspiracy? by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:06:51 PM
Leser by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:54:30 AM
Leser by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:59:22 AM
Flagged by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 9:06:21 AM
Limiting comment on your article by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 9:52:12 AM
What is it you are accusing me of now? by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:12:02 PM
What is it you are accusing me of now? by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 2:12:08 PM
Yes. Yes. by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:52:13 AM
The Last Word? by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:35:06 PM
My title question remains by Carol Wolman on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:35:32 PM
Nit - what? - who? by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 1:21:28 PM
Test by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:47:37 PM
Test by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:48:48 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury - by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 9:49:03 AM
Please someone comment on the content of the essay! by Carol Wolman on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:05:49 PM
How to engage the public on this? by Maxwell on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:04:08 PM
How to engage the public on this? by Carol Wolman on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:53:38 AM
test position by Rob Kall on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 3:42:07 AM
this by amazin on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 4:08:19 AM
The real reason behind 9-11 by Gill S. Pee on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 9:31:18 AM
Thanks, Carol. by Maturin42 on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 11:24:28 AM
Cheney, not Rumsfeld by jemonk on Friday, May 11, 2007 at 1:23:25 PM
Yes, a Real Investigation Is in Order by Mac McKinney on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:05:48 PM
Give it a rest Lesor...you are resorting to... by Styve on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 2:24:30 PM
... oh yes, you told me... by Steven Leser on Monday, Feb 19, 2007 at 4:45:10 PM
Styve by amazin on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:21:08 AM
Re: Styve by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:50:42 PM
Re Re Styve by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 20, 2007 at 8:54:46 PM
this by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:39:59 AM
Hey Amazin'...didn't follow this today... by Styve on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 1:57:52 AM
Styve by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 4:29:27 AM
Thanks for the encouraging words by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 8:08:04 AM
Really - by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 9:21:15 AM
Really - by amazin on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 9:21:37 AM
Thanks for the response Amazin'! by Styve on Wednesday, Feb 21, 2007 at 4:42:57 PM
You and amazin are quite the pre-pubescent pair by Steven Leser on Thursday, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:35:51 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum