![]() |
By Bruce Morris (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
To keep this from getting esoteric, I will ground it right now. Liberal democracy is based on the premise that the people have all the power and they create governments to serve them. People first, government second as necessary and convenient to the people. Authoritarianism and especially fascism are based on the premise that the government or state has all the power and the people exist to serve the state. State first, people second as necessary and convenient to the state. Under liberal democracy, people have inherent rights that the State can only infringe to the extent it is given permission by the people. Under authoritarianism and fascism, the state has all the rights, and the people only have those rights the state gives them, subject to retraction at any time.
This is where Gonzales appears to be headed. By basing an argument on the implied premise that we lack inherent rights, he is also saying we lack inherent power. If we lack inherent rights and power, then we are subjects of our government, and they can do whatever they wish to us. They will have become true autocrats or even fascists.
Unless Gonzales just did not understand what he was saying, in which case the Bush administration is left with its usual defense against evidence of ill intent: incompetence.
1 | 2
http://madnessofdivinity.blogspot.com
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 6 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |