As Ruppert’s work dug into the underbelly of a web of intrigue regarding US intelligence connections, insider stock trades, war games, etc., the attacks on him became furious . . . but what is odd, is that many of these attacks came from a small but VERY VOCAL group of people purporting to be “9/11 truth activists.”Although the overwhelming majority of those seeking a new 9/11 were eager to hear what Ruppert’s research revealed, there were a very small , but again very LOUD and very AGGRESSIVE, number who slashed and tore at Ruppert’s reputation.
Which brings us back to the now publicly known cointelpro operations of the Vietnam War era, where undercover FBI agents pretended to be activists, in order to rip apart a movement that had much valuable information for Americans. They were used to create chaos within the peace movement, but also to spur it on to lunatic actions that would alienate the movement from the mass public. That effort in the 1960's will seem increasingly familiar to the last few years, as you read on.
Now, years after Michael Ruppert’s pioneering work investigating the events of 9/11, a mild mannered physicist, named Professor Steven Jones appears on the scene.Jones was a man dedicated to science and fact, a physics professor at Brigham Young University in Utah, who had not been a political activist in any real sense, although he had voted for President Bush in the election.
However, at the urging of others he began to examine the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11, from the perspective of a physicist.The first thing he noticed was that the global collapse of World Trade Center’s 1, 2, and later 7 . . . defied the laws of physics.The buildings should have toppled to the side, rather than falling down through all the tons of solid steel and concrete, following the laws of least resistance.But what then peaked Jones’ interest more was that the buildings all fell at near “free fall speed.”
Jones observed that the tops of Towers 1 and 2 should not have been able to fall through approximately eighty floors each at a speed that would indicate that all those many tons of solid steel and concrete "didn’t exist."Jones’ scientific mind, then led him to look at what could have made all the mass of those eighty some floors disappear from beneath the damaged tops of the buildings during the collapse.The most obvious possibility was that explosives planted within the building were detonated in a controlled demolition, just like Vegas hotels we’ve seen brought down on TV are.
Jones then asked publicly for any WTC debris samples anyone may have collected after 9/11 before the mysteriously hurried clean up that caused the collapse steel to be rushed out of the country to be recycled in India and China before a full forensics examination could be done (the most preeminent fire forensics journal in the country, Fire Engineering Magazine’s, editor cried foul.But, that’s a whole other story, and hopefully investigation).
Two people came forward to send WTC debris from the towers collapse, one a 9/11 family member who’d attended the ceremonies at ground zero and swept some up as a keepsake.What Professor Jones found when he analyzed these two separately obtained samples was indications of “thermate,” thermate being a patented control demolition steel cutting agent used to slice steel beams at an angle so that the building falls in on itself, just as the WTC towers all had on 9/11.Images in videos of WTC debris shows some steel columns cut at an angle, as thermate charges would have cut them.
Since then, Steven Jones has actually found traces of still active (un-ignited) thermite flakes in the WTC debris.Thermite is what thermate is made of, but becomes thermate when sulfur is added as an accelerant.Professor Jones work has proven that the most rational investigation of why those three towers fell on 9/11 would be a “controlled demolition” investigation.
Its worth noting here, that such an investigation would require examining and questioning those in charge of WTC security, because to plant the charges necessary to bring down the WTC buildings in the way they collapsed would take weeks, or at the least many days, to set up.A WTC security firm was Securicom.Securicom is a Kuwaiti based company that had two notable figures on its board.Marvin Bush, President GW Bush’s brother, and also GW’s cousin.Many reports by WTC employees of security anomalies including mass security grid shut downs preceded the 9/11 attacks.In fact New York Newsday reported that the normal bomb sniffing dog routines of 9/11 had been mysteriously “called off” right before the day of 9/11/2001.
So, Professor Jones opened up a serious can of worms by methodically examining the debris from the World Trade Centers and examining the pattern and speed of the collapses that day.As Jones’ work dug into the underbelly of a web of intrigue that appeared to involve WTC security issues, and exposing an increasingly unsatisfactory and even misleading NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology, under the Bush Whitehouse) investigation, the attacks on him became furious . . .
In Jones' case, he was attacked by a few but very vocal people, who "claimed" to be for 9/11 truth, yet who bizarrely attacked Jones because he had found evidence of a controlled demolition of the WTC Towers. These "so called truth activists" attacked Jones because they said he was covering up something. These "activists" claimed that the WTCs were never hit by planes on 9/11, and all we saw were only "holograms" and that what actually brought down the towers were "space weapons."
FOR THE RECORD, the mainstream 9/11 truth movement knows this is insane, and that it is meant to distract and dissuade the mass public from looking at the real evidence of the events of 9/11.
Their bizarre assertions, coupled with their vicious attacks of real science based researchers and activists, like Jones, . . . harkens back to the cointelpro efforts of the 1960's.But again, what is odd and suspicious about the attacks on Jones, as it was in Ruppert’s case, is that many of these attacks came from people purporting to be “9/11 truth activists.”
Although the overwhelming majority of those seeking a new 9/11 investigation were eager to hear what Jones’ research revealed, there was this very small, but very LOUD and very AGGRESSIVE, number who slashed and tore at Jones' reputation. Jones eventually helped found "Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice stj911.org, which is highly respected by all those truly seeking a real 9/11 investigation
Which brings us back to the now publicly known cointelpro operations of the Vietnam War era, where agents pretended to be activists, in order to rip apart a movement that had much valuable information for Americans.
It’s worth noting here that the building fire and jet fuel in those buildings did not burn nearly hot enough to melt steel and in fact no steel high rise structures had ever collapsed in a global collapse the way those three WTC buildings had on 9/11 . . . before 9/11.Engineering history was made not once, but three times on 9/11.
By William E. Douglas, Jr., who is author of "The Amateur Parent – A Book on Life, Death, War & Peace, and Everything Else in the Universe." Bill has been a guest columnist for the Kansas City Star, The Business Journal, and other media worldwide. His past essays include, "Exposing the 9/11 Conspiracy Wingnuts," "The Explosion of the 9-11 Truth Movement -- US Media's Dirty Little Secret," "Good Night, and Good Luck - WMD, NIST, Popular Mechanics, 9/11 and Media Crimes" and also "Why the Jewish Community Should Demand 9/11 Truth."
Maybe Kevin's collecting names and addresses of his enimies for that day when the truthers sieze power. I think he plans to go out and round up all his critics and enemies for a little "necktie" party.
BWAHH HAA HAAAH HAA.
{wink}
by
Roark Howard (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 289 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 5:09:26 AM
Where a Public Official Who Lied Us Into War Lives, is diffe
Where a Public Official Who Lied Us Into War Lives, is different than an individual citizen's personal info being tapped and aired.
If you can't see the difference, that's sad.
Also, Alten's personal email was somehow accessed. Barrett never suggested hacking into public officials computers.
What's your point here . . . is it that anyone who questions this govt. is fair game for anything? I don't think most readers here would agree with you on that?
by
Bill Douglas (68 articles, 2 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 434 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 9:40:07 AM
Public posting of private info without consent is wrong
Firstly, I think is TRULY sad and disturbing that Mr. Alten has experienced such attacks upon his person. And certainly I CONDEMN such attacks. And yet, Mr. Alten (and probably yourself Mr. Douglas) should be aware that when you compress the lines of fiction and reality together, there probably will be some "friction" in the form of public attacks. However, this certainly doesn't justify what's occurred or is occurring to either of you.
Secondly, it's my belief that at no point should a private citizen's or public official's private information be posted on the Internet, unless it's been processed in accordance with acceptable use laws or has received permission from the citizen or official themselves. I really don't see why it's "okay" that a public official's residence information can be posted – especially when it's posted by (a) someone(s) with neutral or negative opinions of the official. The "lied about the war" qualifier that you reference is immaterial because it represents an opinion and not established fact or legal truth.
And thirdly, the point made with regard Mr. Barrett's web site is that he appears to believe in a quid pro quo when it comes to "friction". The tasing of Mr. Meyer, while public, did not require the public posting of address information on the officers involved in securing him. But Mr. Barrett appeared to follow your suggestion that it's "okay" to post information on the officers. I honestly believe that' such action is just plain wrong and will only provoke a "retribution" attack in like kind.
I believe the irony of such an action, in light of Mr. Barrett's published support of Mr. Alten and his forthcoming book, borders on the edge of hypocrisy. This is the point being made by the comments.
by
Tom Murphy (2 articles, 2 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 1175 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 1:21:53 PM
Can you link us to the site where the private e-mail was posted so that we can see for ourselves? Not that I don't believe you, but . . . well actually I want to see proof of your claims
by
Roark Howard (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 289 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 2:08:27 PM
Apparently attention to detail isn't your strong suit...
There's a difference between someone vested with government "authority" engaged in what appears to be abuse of that authority, and someone, e.g., the author, expressing a personal opinion about an important topic, as he has a right to do.
Alas such nuance has no place in the "mind" of a pathetic statist drone such as yourself.
by
Harold Smith (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 297 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 1:01:09 PM
This is a very nice discussion of some the issue we face as seekers for justice. The peace movement and the anti-globalization movement, in short, any group questioning the elite, get the same treatment. In Canada, some activists captured quite clearly agents provacateur on video at Montebello in Quebec. An activist must assume that at some point, the movement will be infiltrated.
I think that the stress of dealing with this damaged Ruppert's health, and eventually led to his abandonment of 9-11 truth work.
We still have the issue of understanding who is actively shilling, or conducting disinformation campaigns by infiltrating activist groups. We can have our suspicians, but unless we see the paychecks, I am not sure how we can distinguish infiltrators from people with ideas that are misguided, perhaps more than a little bit 'cranky'. Of course, we are regarded as 'cranks' ourselves by many, incuding frequent commentators on this site.
It is so good to see you, and 'George Washington' posting routinely on this site.
I make the following suggestion with all due respect and in an attempt to be helpful: please find an editor to go through your article. It needs to be edited in a number of areas. One example is that you use the sentence "Personally, I have read it, and I know exactly what it is that threatens the powers that be" twice at the end of the article (if that was intentional, it doesn't work).
Considering that your article is being being linked to from theshellgame.net, I thought you might want to make your article to be as tightened-up and polished as possible.
Best,
AC
by
Alex Carson (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 9:38:13 PM
I think you let the Weisenthal Centre off way too easily. They should be required to put up or shut up. Are you afraid of them? Poor guy, get some backbone for Pete's sake!
by
Archie (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 728 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 9:58:23 PM
Very good timing, Bill, especially with the recent attempt to (with complicity of the MSM) further propagandize Americans with the recent Iranian gunboat 'provocation' sham.
When people react with emotions such as fear, instead of cold hard reason & rational thinking, blind faith rather than evidence, they become sheep ready for slaughter by the unscrupulous. We have seen it too many times in history, but I still believe it possible (somehow) to break this vicious cycle. Keep up the good work; you have more people on your side now than even you are aware of.
For humans to survive & thrive as more than mere slaves 'we' have no choice but to specifically identify the elusive individuals in the 'they'. Just as the enemies of truth repeat their lies until they are believed to be true, so too must we repeatedly name the names of the criminals whose intent is to enslave humanity. Only then can an intentionally dumbed-down, ignorant, ill-informed, propagandized public have any hope of seeing the light of truth.
by
Paul Magill Smith (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 16 comments)
on Thursday, January 10, 2008 at 10:05:43 PM
Congratulations on a well-written, insightful and comprehensive piece. The chronology of major figures like Jones and Gage is valuable in and of itself. The added layer of cointelpro is made even more effective because of that solid work.
You probably know this, but Michael Wolsey at Visibility 9/11 also investigates the cointelpro aspect and has done a series on it: http://visibility911.com/
Again, congrats and thanks for this important article.
by
David Taylor (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 4 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 6:33:08 AM
“However, some of the transcripts are highly redacted. What information did the New York Times redact? You guessed it... supporting evidence for Directed Energy Weapons! This was confirmed by a later interview with one of the First Responders!
So, the media is nothing more than a propaganda machine. Anyone promoting controlled demolitions instead of directed energy weapons is playing right into the 9/11 perpetrators' hands.”
So is CB_Brooklyn one of those you denounce as Disinfo?
by
Roark Howard (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 289 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 11:37:27 AM
BUT, if you want to turn off everyone from the 9/11 truth movement, a sure way to do it is to tell them that there were no planes hitting the WTC buildings on 9/11, and they only saw some fantastic holographic illusion.
They'll laugh at you and never look at real 9/11 facts again.
by
Bill Douglas (68 articles, 2 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 434 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 6:29:40 PM
First of all, government plants like Steven Jones have brainwashed the "truth movement" into thinking directed energy weapons and Tv-Fakery are "crazy disinfo". He did that for a purpose: to hide the real truth.
Second, there are people who have the brains to apply basic physics to an event, such as Newton's Laws of Motion to the cartoon airplanes. The videos are fake.
Third, your claim that people will "laugh at you" is silly and unfounded. The TRUTH is that most people see the TRUTH of 9/11 from the directed energy weapon / TV-Fakery evidence, especially when coupled with attorney Jerry Leaphart's two court cases in the US District Court, Southern New York.
Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion. Click here for video.Show it to people and gauge their reaction.
If people laugh at the idea of holograms/projections, show them the analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews that were published in the New York Times. Prove to them that a very small percentage of the First Responders who reported seeing airplanes also reported hearing them. In other words, most of the First Responders did NOT report hearing commercial aircraft. However, they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on!Click here for analysis. Show it to people and gauge their reaction.
The perpetrators are controlling the "truth movement"! Can't you see that?
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
by
CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 353 comments)
on Friday, January 11, 2008 at 10:51:31 PM
How do we know that Steven Jones found anything? I mean, has anyone even heard of this guy before 9/11? I haven't, but others have. He was the one who discredited free energy Cold Fusion research back in 1989. (See my blog here for information.)
Take a look at this 1993 news video clip of Dr Eugene Mallove. He certainly seems confident in the future of Cold Fusion heating devices in homes, doesn't he? Note that he blames the Dept of Energy report in 1989 for erasing all funding for Cold Fusion.
See Dr Mallove's 1993 book "Fire from Ice" and you'll learn the techniques that Steven Jones used to discedit Cold Fusion. Then apply it to 9/11 and you'll see it's the same thing!
As far as the dancing Israelis, it may have actually happened. But the way I see things these days... if it was published in the media, it was for the purpose of distracting people from other issues. Why else would they publish it???
by
CB Brooklyn (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 353 comments)
on Saturday, January 12, 2008 at 8:47:57 PM
I am sure you are well aware CB that you would not know a fact if it saved your life. However please keep posting as you are a prime example of how disinformation propagators work.
by
Steve Lane (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments)
on Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 6:30:07 AM
People would be more willing and less fearful of adopting the views of 911 Truth activists if they felt they were calling for forgiveness rather than retribution and punishment.
The peace movement should call for granting amnesty from prosecution and guarantee of an ample, lifetime pension to anyone who agrees to testify on their roles in the events of 9/11, extending this offer to any members of the US government, foreign governments and/or terrorist groups involved in the planning or execution of the attacks of that day.
Additionally, individuals should step forward and volunteer to spend time working with those who give testimony on crimes they have committed so that they might be reintegrated into society.
Instead of executing Nazi war criminals we should have devoted all the human resources available to us to rehabilitating them, awakening in them awareness of the nature of their actions so that they could have come to understand that they must make amends. If they had remained alive they would have been a living testament to the transformative powers of forgiveness.
Historians and psychologists especially should come out in favor of preserving invaluable study material in the form of the opportunity to converse with the authors of unfortunate historical deeds.
A declaration of willingness to forgive would force the government's hand. If it were to arrest or make attempts to discredit someone calling for 911 truth plus forgiveness, that would be a tacit acknowledgement by the government of its complicity in the 9/11 attacks. Imagine the impact of footage on YouTube of police arresting demonstrators carrying signs reading: "I forgive you George Bush for 9/11." Perhaps even the passively complicit mainstream media could be convinced to show someone carrying a sign calling for amnesty for the perpetrators of 9/11.
If we consider ourselves morally superior to the government, we should propose actions and attitudes that are more humanitarian with respect to them than their actions have been with respect to us.
I strongly suspect that the white apartheid government in South Africa did not agree to fair elections until assured that they would not be executed or imprisoned by the black majority government when it came to power.
In "The Art of War", Sun Tzu said never to surround an enemy. If you do not leave him an out, he will fight to the last man
