Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (23 comments)

An Alternative to Impeachment

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

The challenge represents a strategem for dealing with those Republicans, and to those in the right-wing propaganda machine, whose automatic attack on the speaker and defense of the Bushites is entirely predictable.

"To those of you who would deny the truth of these charges," our speaker would say, "I challenge you to put my charges and your denials to the test. Let us have no more of your propaganda, heedless of facts and intended only to mislead the American people. Let us instead conduct a kind of trial --to be nationally televised-- to see who has the truth on his side."

And with that there would be some suitable proposal for how this public hearing, or trial, would be conducted. This proposal would presumably include procedures for examining and cross-examining witnesses, expert and otherwise, and establish some appropriate limitations on the length of the proceedings (perhaps a week). And it would indicate the nature of the jury that would eventually judge the matter-- either a representative group of average Americans empaneled for the purpose, or a large sampling of public opinion.

It would be a "put your money where your mouth is" laying down of the gauntlet, setting up the playing field to block the Bushites from getting away with their usual dishonest, propagandistic response to every confrontation with the truth. If the Bushites' advocates remain silent, then the indictment will stand as a powerful statement, unanswered. But if they speak up they will be pressed to put their defense to the test.

I am confident how that test would turn out: with any hearing conducted according to procedures designed to establish the truth, the Bushites do not stand a chance.

There could be one additional component to this "put your money where your mouth is" challenge.


The speaker(s) --Senator Leahy, and/or whoever-- could raise the stakes thus: "I challenge you, who would defend these criminal and corrupt leaders, to put yourselves on the line, as I will also do. I feel so confident that what I say is true, and that the American people can be persuaded of its truth, that I will pledge that should I lose the case that we argue before this jury of Americans, I will give up my position in the Senate and go into retirement. I/we will pledge that in exchange for your also pledging to put your positions on the line also.

"If you hold elective office, you would --if you lose-- give up your seat. If you are a talk-show host, you would --if you lose-- give up your program. (Etc.)

"Enough of the lies and the propaganda that have ruled this dark period of our history. Let's have it out in a proceeding designed to disclose the truth to the American people. And let no one step forward into this arena who is not prepared to put his money where his mouth is."

BY-PASSING THE SUPPOSED PROBLEMS WITH IMPEACHMENT

The reasons given for not impeaching these Bushite criminals may not be persuasive to those of us who think the oath to "defend the Constitution" is supposed to mean what an oath is supposed to mean. But those reasons are nonetheless apparently major considerations for many of the politicians who took that oath. And the present proposed alternative manages to by-pass many of those political concerns:



** This proposal does not require that Congress focus on impeachment at the supposed expense of "taking care of the public's business." Should there actually be a public proceeding on national television, it would presumably be a specially created forum that would operate outside the auspices of Congress.

** This purpose of this approach is merely to present the truth to the American people, and not to effect the removal of the Bushites from office. It is a defense of the soul of the American democracy, not a play for power. The focus on the importance of the truth --and of repudiating the people and forces that have made this assault on American law and values-- makes it irrelevant that this presidency will soon be over anyway.

** Because the proceedings and the rendering of a verdict --should the challenge be taken up-- would be outside the precincts of Congress, we would not have the spectacle of our representatives voting along party lines. This should help avoid the (bogus) accusation that what is happening is a matter of partisan politics.


BOTTOM LINE

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Andy Schmookler is running for Congress in Virginia's 6th District.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

NIce concept, but... by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 5:23:46 PM
Heroism is generally found in the singular by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 6:33:03 PM
The fixers by Peter Dearman on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 11:24:50 AM
Alternatives to Impeachment, in re: by Rick Blair on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 6:29:48 PM
Treat the disease rather than symptom by Andris on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 7:34:56 PM
There's more to the American electorate than Bush's diehards by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 8:19:54 PM
An Alternative by Bill Cain on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 8:00:56 PM
A pipe dream by ardee D. on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 9:17:52 PM
The tides of despair by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Sep 4, 2007 at 9:23:24 PM
What nonsense, Andy by ardee D. on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 6:33:17 AM
Alternative to impeachment is elective tyranny by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 1:12:28 AM
Art imitating life by Frank J. Ranelli on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 1:18:30 AM
A "true believer" just might by Peter Dearman on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 11:36:34 AM
???? by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 5:51:00 AM
I agree with Professor Pete by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 8:08:22 AM
Panurg by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 8:38:54 AM
What crappy academic thinking by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 8:45:36 AM
Mr. Hirshorne by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 9:45:50 AM
Joel S. Hirschhorn by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 9:48:25 AM
Good points Andrew by John R Moffett on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 9:55:46 AM
PS by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 10:05:57 AM
Good advice. by Peter Dearman on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 11:49:09 AM
The Pelosi Problem by Jim Freeman on Wednesday, Sep 5, 2007 at 1:45:28 PM