63 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Constitutional 'Originalists' Mum On Presidential Signing Statements

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Message Allen Snyder
What Dubya has been doing by circumventing the bill-passing process is inventing the rules as he goes along, completely in violation of the Constitution. Even BushCo's regressive enablers and spinmeisters in the media are unable to provide any legal justification for these actions. The best Secretary of Lies Tony '2500 is just a number' Snow can do is say, 'well, other presidents did it, so there'. This is a common regressive line of argument. They use it to justify their lies and their...lies, and more, well, lies.

Regressives' unwillingness or sheer inability to appreciate depth and nuance prevents them from supposing that we should have b*tch-slapped those other Presidents for their behavior, too, not let their illegal acts justify further illegal acts. But now it's their boy breaking the law so they swing into whatever-it-takes mode.

Another popular, but equally bogus rationale, is that somehow, like every other dangerous action on BushCo's part, signing statements are covered Dubya's having been given the title 'Commander-in-Chief' when he was installed. But since this designation concerns only military action and signing statements, as is all legislative action, a civilian affair, this defense obviously blows.

Naturally, both of these lines of 'reasoning' work splendidly with the Kool-Aid drinking BushCo lovers. And with folks for whom ignorance is like oxygen, you'd expect nothing less.

The bottom line is that Dubya routinely violates the Constitution with impunity and should be indicted and thrown in prison for it. He's a dangerous criminal and the biggest threat to both the country, the world, democracy and liberty. While Constitutional originalists ought to be the vanguard for impeachment based on this alone, they instead add insult to injury by enabling further desecration of America's premier document.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Allen Snyder Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Allen Snyder can be reached at asnyder111@bellsouth.net This article is copyright by Allen Snyder and originally published by www.opednews.com but permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media so long as this credit is (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

America Headed Toward Feudal Fascism

The Elements of Regressive Voting Crimes

Why Al Gore Couldn't Lose in 2008

Constitutional 'Originalists' Mum On Presidential Signing Statements

More Tortured Logic From The Regressive Right

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend