OpEdNews » FRONTLINE'S ' DARK SIDE ' NAILS CHENEY & RUMSFELD

Tags for This Article:

Populum Tag Cloud Control Panel
	Fine tune your search to access content

Articles	Links
Diaries	Products
Events	All

All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs

From:
Month Day Year

To:
Month Day Year

Alphabet Popularity	Count ON Count OFF
This Level	Sub-levels

Tag(s): Bush Idiot-in-Chief; Bush Liar-in-Chief; Bush Reasons To Dump Impeach; California; Chickenhawks; Conspiracy; Constitutional Issues; Crime; European Union; Lies Bush; (more...) Lies- Pentagon; Middle East; People Dick Cheney; Scandals-Bush-GOP; Sonoma County; USA United States Of America; United Kingdom; War Criminal- Crimes (less...)
Add to My Group

June 21, 2006 at 12:15:10

FRONTLINE'S ' DARK SIDE ' NAILS CHENEY & RUMSFELD

by Allen L Roland Page 2 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

SAVE FAVORITES

VIEW FAVORITES

View Ratings | Rate It

Tenet leaves as a thoroughly compromised man who first opposes some of Cheney's intelligence conclusions and then caves. He receives from Bush the Medal of Freedom ~ the highest honor the president can bestow ~ as he is pushed out. "You've seen this episode of 'I, Claudius,' you know?" says Steve Coll of the *New Yorker*. "You put the knife in one side and the medal on the other side and that's politics."

"The Dark Side" is, in a sense, CIA payback for its treatment. The program is dominated by legions of former CIA officers, some of whom left over the agency's treatment by the White House, and they detail what they view as Cheney's efforts to find the intelligence to fit the war he wanted against Saddam. Virtually no one, in contrast, appears from the Cheney-Rumsfeld camp to defend the two men's actions.

The talking heads are excellent. Most of the ex-spooks are strong, as is David Kay, leader of the failed attempt to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. So are intelligence experts Ron Suskind and James Bamford and the inevitable Bob Woodward.

"Frontline" walks us through the bad intelligence that Cheney spouted in public, even after the CIA had challenged it, like an Al Qaeda-Saddam connection and Saddam's supposed purchase of enriched uranium from Niger. We hear that the president's first reaction to the WMD evidence was, "Is that all we got?"

We hear that Powell was not told the truth about the provenance of facts on which he based his disastrous speech at the United Nations, and that Cheney and Libby made 10 trips to the CIA -- unheard of by the White House -- to push analysts on data.

Paul Pillar, a respected former CIA officer, was a principal author of a signal report on WMDs in Iraq that proved so wrong. "The purpose was to strengthen the case for going to war with the American public," he says. "Is it proper for the intelligence community to publish papers for that purpose?

I don't think so, and I regret having had a role in it."

1 | 2

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
SUPPORT STATE IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTIONS

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.allenroland.com

Allen L Roland is a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on his weblog and website allenroland.com He also guest hosts a monthly national radio show TRUTHTALK on Conscious talk radio www.conscioustalk.net