Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
April 26, 2006 at 23:00:00

View Ratings | Rate It

IT'S SPRING / IMPEACHMENT IS IN THE AIR

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Allen L Roland (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

In an interview with impeachment expert Michael Ratner, Roychoudhuri observed that:

"[T]he distant rumbling is growing louder by the day, creating a resonant echo that is rapidly taking root in public discourse. 'Impeach Him,' reads the cover of this month's Harper's Magazine. And in a public forum in New York City last week, journalists, lawyers and political figures came together to discuss the case against our president."

While the main impediment continues to be a sycophantic Republican majority, polls show that more Americans favor impeachment hearings than currently approve of the job Bush is doing (33 to 32 percent).

In addition, as Bob Geiger notes, Bush's state-by-state popularity is lower than even his anemic nationwide figures suggest, with a paltry four states remaining red two years into his second term. In other words, the population has the stomach for it even if the representatives don't.


The legal basis for these unprecedented state-level actions was discovered when, according to Steven Leser, Illinois Rep. Karen A. Yarbrough "stumbled on a little known and never utlitized rule of the U.S. House of Representatives."

The rule was written in a book formerly known as Jefferson's Manual, which, according to C-SPAN, "is a book of rules of procedure and parliamentary philosophy ... written by Thomas Jefferson in 1801 ... [used by the House] as a supplement to its standing rules." Section LIII, sec. 603 states, "There are various methods of setting an impeachment in motion ... [one of them is] by charges transmitted from the legislature of a State ..."

Each of the three resolutions mentions Iraq lies, torture and illegal spying, with slight variations in tone and specifics.

Assemblyman Paul Koretz's California resolution (which includes Dick Cheney) and the Illinois resolution both include the leak of Valerie Plame's identity, while Vermont's focuses almost exclusively on Bush's most salient transgression, his illegal spying on Americans.

The spying charge leads the other two resolutions' list of charges as well.

In December, cringing at the prospect of getting scooped by its own reporter's upcoming book on the subject, the New York Times published a story it'd been sitting on for months at the behest of the Bush administration.

The front page story by James Risen and Eric Lichtblau outlined a program for illegally spying on American citizens, which had been explicitly authorized by the president. It became popularly known as the NSA Wiretapping Scandal.

Having failed at pressuring the Times into hiding the story for another three years, the Bush administration opted for its signature blend of hubris and fear, at once admitting publicly to having violated the law but hiding beneath the smoke of "terrorism prevention" and the mirrors of the Nixonian prerogative: "When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal."

Of course, we now know precisely how much water that explanation holds, even if reworded for maximum terror exploitation: "When the commander-in-chief does it, it is not illegal."

Still, despite the fact that no attempt was made to cover up this blatant violation of the law, political will in the Republican-controlled House to bring impeachment was harder to find than a fact in the mouth of Scotty McClellan.

Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold's resolution to censure the president (impeachment is a House-only proposition) -- a measure supported by a plurality of American voters -- included a crystal-clear retort to partisan claims that the illegal wiretapping was necessary:

This issue is not about whether the government should be wiretapping terrorists -- of course it should, and it can under current law ... But this president and this administration decided to break the law, and they have yet to give a convincing explanation of why their actions were necessary, appropriate or legal.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
SUPPORT STATE IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTIONS

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.allenroland.com

Allen L Roland is a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on his weblog and website more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for " 2006 Campaigns"
The Power of Money in Congressional Campaigns, 1880-2006 (Congressional Studies)
by David C. W. Parker

$45.00
Lowest New Price $41.58

Number of pages: 278
Publisher: University of Oklahoma Press

Lobbying Pac's
by Christianson Coyle Poliakoff Dyer

$19.45

Number of pages: 1494
Publisher: Thomson West

From Election to Coup in Fiji: The 2006 campaign and its Aftermath.
by Jon and Stewart Firth [eds]. Fraenkel

$30.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: IPS Publications.

The Battle for Congress: Iraq, Scandal, and Campaign Finance in the 2006 Election
by David B. Magleby

$32.95
Lowest New Price $9.00

Number of pages: 264
Publisher: Paradigm Publishers

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum