January 6, 2006 at 16:18:45

View Ratings | Rate It

UNDERSTANDING THE BUSH IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY

By Allen L Roland (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

It can be inferred from the Constitution. When the president is protecting America, he may by definition make any inference from the Constitution that he chooses. He is keeping America safe.

Who decides what measures are necessary to keep America safe?

The president.

Who has oversight over the actions of the president?

The president oversees his own actions. If at any time he determines that he is a danger to America, he has the right to wiretap himself, name himself an enemy combatant and spirit himself away to a secret prison in Egypt.

But isn't there a secret court, the FISA court, that has the power to authorize wiretapping warrants? Wasn't that court set up for just such situations when national security is at stake?

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court might disagree with the president. It might thwart his plans. It is a danger to the democracy that we hold so dear. We must never let the courts stand in the way of America's safety.

So there are no guarantees that the president will act in the best interests of the country?

The president was elected by the people. They chose him; therefore he represents the will of the people. The people would never act against their own interests; therefore, the president can never act against the best interests of the people. It's a doctrine I like to call "the triumph of the will."

But surely the Congress was also elected by the people, and therefore also represents the will of the people. Is that not true?

Congress? Please.

It's sounding more and more as if your version of the presidency resembles an absolute monarchy. Does it?

Of course not. We Americans hate kings. Kings must wear crowns and visit trade fairs and expositions. The president only wears a cowboy hat and visits military bases, and then only if he wants to.

Can the president authorize torture?

No. The president can only authorize appropriate means.

Could those appropriate means include torture?

 1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.allenroland.com

 

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend:

                                                      (More...)

 

Most Popular Articles in the Last 2 Days (by Recommend Emails) Kucinich: Why I Voted NO by Dennis Kucinich Why is it we have finite resources for health care but unlimited money for war? by Dennis Kucinich House Passes Weak Public Option Health Care Bill, Selling Out Women's Rights. Includes Democrats Who Voted Against Bill by Rob Kall The Evil Empire by Paul Craig Roberts Another Neocon Makes Turkish Ties & Connections Official by Sibel Edmonds A Special Report -- The Crazy October Surprise Debunking by Robert Parry Rendition Prosecuted Abroad While U.S. Courts Do Nothing by Mary Shaw Fort Hood's Killer Shrink: Was He One of the Army Docs Pressured to Misdiagnose PTSD in Soldiers? by Harkavy Hillary, Congress Bury Goldstone Report, Shirking Accountability for US Role in Gaza Raids by Eileen Fleming How to End Wars by David Swanson Go To Top 50 Most Popular