Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (11 comments)

Will the USS Enterprise Be Sunk To Start A War With Iran

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (9 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

The USS Enterprise is the worlds first nuclear powered aircraft carrier. It
was Commissioned in 1961 and is due to be decommissioned in 2014 or 2015. The
ship was selected to be the “victim” of this “attack” due to its age.

THOSE PLANNING THE ATTACK ARE INSIDE THE U.S. AND ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS and view
the loss of the Enterprise crew as a necessary sacrifice to induce Americans to
support war against Iran. Put bluntly, the ship and crew are to be cannon
fodder. MUCH MORE

Understandably, anyone will note that this post on the US Navy Forum predicted this event to occur in 2006, however, from this writer’s viewpoint, exposing the potential danger to the USS Enterprise could have helped to sour those plans, as the public was made aware of the plot. When I read the Post in the Navy Forum, I felt it best to be safe rather than sorry later, and repost this information in case such an even should occur. We all know that Bush and Cheney (Especially Darth Cheney) are itching to bomb Iran, and with Dennis Kucinich vowing to bring impeachment proceedings against Vice-President Cheney before Thanksgiving LINK, we need to be particularly observant of anything that could be used to start a war with Iran - or places US military personnel in harms way. Why are we still saber-rattling in the Gulf rather than attempting to deescalate tensions?

Most of us aware that the US Special Forces and Israeli Mossad Units are some of the best in the world at infiltrating and commandeering enemy positions; Whereas the post in the US Navy Forum speculated the attack would be via Chinese made Silkworm missiles, the stakes have been raised much higher, and Iran has deployed the fearsome Russian made Sunburn Anti-ship Missile throughout the straights of Hormuz, and commandeering one of those positions and firing several of those at the USS Enterprise would be child’s-play for CIA, US Special Forces, or even the Mossad. I have never underestimated the capability of any of those agencies - and with our history of False-Flag attacks, this is a matter that we need to keep on eye on - whether it’s a probability, possibility, or in the alternative, pure poppycock.

I have no inside information that any of the above is true, and am merely posting this information because if the US was to sacrifice any of our Carriers to start a war with Iran - it would seem highly probable to me that we would sacrifice the USS Enterprise since it is due to be deactivated upon completion of the CVNX 1. LINK Here is the page that includes the history of the USS Enterprise which was commissioned on 25 November 1961 - making it a Carrier that is the oldest nuclear powered Carrier in our Fleet. LINK

William Cormier

Correction: When I originally posted this piece, I erroneously stated the full strike force was not included. My apology, however, the fact remains that the post on the Navy Forum on its face is of concern - and why are we still running operations in a volatile region that Bush and Cheney wish to attack? Rather than deescalating tensions, it appears that once again, we are preparing for a conflict with the oldest US nuclear powered Carrier in the Fleet. As I stated, this is for informational purposes, and we cannot be certain that the publication on the Navy forum did not help to deter such an action - thus my reposting of that information again when it’s an obvious move at “saber rattling” by Bush and Cheney.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://thepoliticalbandit.com/

I am nothing more than a patriotic American that is doing whatever I can to further the cause of democracy, the rule of law, and am extremely concerned in regard the slow creep of "soft fascism" that has been destroying America's middle-class. I (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Very Interesting by Mac McKinney on Friday, Nov 2, 2007 at 11:39:52 PM
Explains why U.S military is opposed to attacking Iran by Dr Michael Salla on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 12:35:28 AM
Wow by CJ on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 9:08:27 AM
Don't Throw Baby Out with Bath Water by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 10:12:54 AM
Hal Turner is a RAVING NEO-NAZI! by Jay Lovestone on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 9:34:11 AM
So, Do We Start Censoring Sources Now? by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 10:17:55 AM
What you failed to mention! by William Cormier on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 10:18:48 AM
Dont feel bad Mr. Cormier, Turner fooled me too. by john riggs on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 12:20:46 PM
There are some very valid facts as pointed out by Mr. Salla by William Cormier on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 8:16:03 PM
Scary enough to be prophetic by Andris on Saturday, Nov 3, 2007 at 10:54:10 PM
They can try by Dave Kisor on Sunday, Nov 4, 2007 at 7:42:34 PM