General News

Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -
Gourley also notes that the online journal, 'The Journal of 9/11 Studies,' has published refutations of many of the unscientific claims such as these.

"Scientists have responded to these outlandish claims in writing. Their refutations have undergone peer review and have been approved prior to publication.." The Fetzer/Wood/Reynolds claims are unable to withstand any serious scientific scrutiny.

His own group's submission, Gourley points out, is the first one which seriously addresses specific and significant aspects of the Report, rather than only minor details or making nonsense appeals.

Physicist Steven Jones says, "Our submission asks some very crucial questions which are necessary for any scientific Report, regardless of what our own positions are on what happened."

Architect Richard Gage, AIA agrees. "Here's one of the grossest examples," he says, "While the NIST-sponsored UL floor assembly fire tests demonstrated only 2 to 4 inches of sag with no failure at 2,000 degrees for 2 hours, NIST never-the-less used 42 inches of sag in their computer models and concluded failure! These are very basic inconsistencies and suggest some serious data integrity problems."

And one problem the group comes back to is that few have taken the time to comb through the massive Report. The likely reality, they say, is that most people assume that what's contained in the approximately 10,000 pages is correct because, "Frankly," Gage says, "people have been paid a lot of money - and these are the 'experts'. They weren't looking at the more reasonable hypothesis of controlled demolition. Instead, they just worked the numbers backwards until their desired conclusion - collapse by fire - was supported."
- Advertisement -

A PDF of the Request for Correction is available here:

Related links:

Steven Jones:
Kevin Ryan:
Richard Gage:
Bob McIlvaine:
Bill Doyle:
Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice:
NIST Final Report:

Department of Commerce, Office of the Chief Information Officer, FY 2007 Information Quality Request for Corrections Page (will take some time to register this Request):
- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2

Psychology researcher, committee member of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, working on 9/11 issues since 2003.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Given all the other lies and deceptions of th... by jpsmith123 on Thursday, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:59:11 PM
The towers were such an obvious controlled demolit... by Rae on Friday, Apr 13, 2007 at 2:02:57 PM
Laser-type weapons have been under development for... by JimZ on Saturday, Apr 14, 2007 at 6:08:19 PM
 It doesn't take a rocket scientist to fi... by Mom47 on Saturday, May 26, 2007 at 8:42:03 PM