51 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Voting update: News from the NASS Conference

By Kathy Dopp, National Election Data Archive  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
NEDA's new vote count audit "election integrity" equation will
virtually ensure that election outcomes are correct, as well as
scientifically prove that fixed 1 or 2% audits are insufficient for
ensuring correct election outcomes in cases with close candidate
margins, especially in small or medium-sized jurisdictions. This is
the way to achieve the goal that everyone agrees on: "correct election
outcomes that result in the properly elected candidates being sworn
into office"

NEDA thus has derived two new equations since November 2004 that will
help to ensure accurate election results:

1. NEDA's "exit poll discrepancy" equation will allow mathematicians
or statisticians to test patterns of exit poll discrepancy data to
evaluate whether the discrepancy patterns are more consistent with
vote miscount or with partisan response bias. No more long-winded
academic debates over exit poll data. However, this method requires
publicly available exit poll data, and funding would have to be raised
to conduct public exit polls.

and

2. NEDA's "election integrity" vote count audit equation will
scientifically ensure that the right candidates are sworn into office,
and who wouldn't agree with that? Certainly the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) will adopt this audit percentage
equation as the new standard for auditing vote count accuracy.

Because these new methods for ensuring election integrity will not be
implemented in time for the upcoming November 2006 race, NEDA urgently
needs funding now to complete legal and technical projects necessary
to obtain and analyze the detailed vote count data that can be used,
as it was in Washington and New Mexico, to uncover probable vote
miscounts and spur the adoption of better voting systems.

Here are the handouts I created for NASS conference attendees:

How Election Officials Could Ensure Accurate Vote Counts
http://electionarchive.org/ucvanalysis/us/election_officials/audits_monitoring.p
df

Brennan Center Report - one page summary
http://electionarchive.org/ucvinfo/us/brennancenter-votingsystems.pdf

US League of Women Voters' New Official Position on U.S. Voting Systems
http://electionarchive.org/ucvinfo/us/lwvus-resolution2006.pdf

There are Virtually NO Federal Voting System Guidelines
http://electionarchive.org/ucvinfo/us/nofederalstandards.pdf

I hope these will be useful for your own local city, county, and state
officials.

Thank you.
--
----
Kathy Dopp
http://electionarchive.org
National Election Data Archive
US Count Votes, P.O. Box 682556, Park City, UT 84068
Dedicated to Accurately Counting Elections
Subscribe to announcements by emailing election-subscribe@uscountvotes.org
Please donate or volunteer.

"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body
and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day," wrote
Thomas Jefferson in 1816

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: election-unsubscribe@uscountvotes.org
For additional commands, e-mail: election-help@uscountvotes.org

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend