|
|
Tags for This Article:
Bush Admin (1983) Bush Idiot-in-Chief (824) Bush Administration Incompetence (307) Bush War Czar (217) Bushisms (52) Napoleon (13)
|
Add to My Group
The Ivy League graduate's understanding of history within living memory is grossly suspect. He firmly believes Japan is the model for democracy in Iraq. On September 3, 2004 he addressed his flock at West Allis, Wisconsin to justify his invasion and to rally support for his war presidential credentials. I believe in the transformational power of liberty [a Rove talking point?]. I've seen it happen throughout history, and so have you. We've seen nations in our own hemisphere become free nations [Cuba? Venezuela? Colombia? Guatemala in 1954?] and allies [Mexico?] in the sake of peace. You know, I sit down at the table with Prime Minister Koizumi and discuss North Korea and other issues, on how to keep the peace. I'm able to do so because my predecessor and other citizens of this great country believe that liberty could convert an enemy [Pearl Harbor] into a friend [The Bomb]. There was [sic] a lot of cynics and doubters in those days -- you can understand why. Japan was a fierce enemy. I mean, people couldn't envision how liberty could transform a society. But there were fellow country people of ours who did believe that then. And today we sit down with an [a former] enemy and talk about the peace. See, that's what's taking place. Liberty is powerful. Some day an American President is going to be sitting down with a duly-elected leader of Iraq talking about keeping the peace, talking about -- (applause.) A free Afghanistan and a free Iraq will set powerful examples in a neighborhood [from the Pillars of Hercules to the Himalayas?] that is desperate for freedom. George W. Bush's statement concerning Japan's imposed democracy following utter defeat in comparison to the hoped for goal of establishing a democracy in Iraq with the rule of law, freedom of the press, and independent courts, defies logic. Japan was a homogenous society ruled by an emperor who lost his power yet retained his influence over his erstwhile subjects. Hirohito's acceptance of the new status quo meant that the Japanese people acquiesced to the new order in their country. In contrast, Iraq is a fractured society along Sunni versus Shia lines, accompanied by Kurdish, Arab, Turkoman, Assyrian, and Christian divisions.Most Iraqis identify with their clan or tribe, which ensures a weak sense of nationhood. Bush refuses to acknowledge the stark difference between tribal Iraq and militaristic Japan. Tokyo's bureaucracy survived while government continued functioning in rural villages and townships. Social cohesion remained intact. No ethnic or religious fault lines emerged in Japan following the formal surrender in Tokyo Bay.If the Commander Guy had been president during the rise of the Rome-Berlin-Tokyo Axis, we'd be speaking Italian now. Bush's distance from reality can be discerned from the following metric. The day before the 2006 mid-term election, he asked J. Dennis Hastert (R-Il) the GOP leader in the House to serve as speaker again in order to shepherd the White House's agenda. Common sense concluded before the election that the president's unpopularity would cause the Republicans to lose control of the House, at the least, yet, according to Robert Draper in his work, Dead Certain: The Presidency Of George W. Bush, the Decider-in-Chief actually believed that his party would hold the House and add seats in Senate. A bright flare in the air benchmark regarding Bush's relationship to the truth was displayed at the end of April when he criticized Congress for not allowing drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, it would take ten years for oil to be produced from ANWR. Refining capacity, speculation, and the falling dollar impact the price of finished petroleum products more than supply. Before Bush's War began, a barrel of oil sold for less than $30.The Bush administration and its neo-con embeds concluded the world had changed after the 9/11 tragedy but they forgot that nations at war require allies --- competence trumps ideological loyalty in the real world.Without Islamic allies, the Americans in Iraq are viewed by Arabs on the street as Crusaders thirsting for oil. In remarks reported in The New York Sun, Paul Wolfowitz, the so-called architect of the Iraq War and deputy defense secretary, acknowledged that the government did not foresee an insurgency and was "pretty much clueless on counterinsurgency" in 2003. Despite the Soviet experience in Afghanistan, the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld triumvirate did not anticipate the possibility of 4th generation asymmetrical warfare in Iraq that has no Forward Edge of the Battle Area. Though all the senior policy-makers, including generals, share blame for the Iraq fiasco, President Bush alone bears responsibility for the falling dominoes of bad decisions. From their initial emphasis on missile defense and their dismissal of Clinton administration concerns about homeland terrorist attacks, the Bush administration has demonstrated non-pareil cluelessness since it took office. Moreover, the man of principle, who lauds the spread of liberty, ignores sham democracies in Zimbabwe and Venezuela or the agony of Darfur. George Bush's decision to invade Iraq could be history's greatest blunder since Napoleon's decision to march on Moscow after the Battle of Smolensk in August 1812. The chief beneficiary of Bush's invasion policy has been the Iraqi government which no longer fears an attack from Sadaam Hussein's Iraq. Tehran's government exercises increasing influence especially in southern Iraq, which is the main source of the Baghdad regime's oil wealth. In contrast, without the corset of American firepower, their lack of artillery, tanks, and helicopter gun ships prevents the Iraqi Army from defending its borders against Iran or Syria.Results of the 2006 mid-term election, the desire for change among the majority of the electorate, will be confirmed by the forthcoming presidential election when either Clinton or Obama is elected. Democrats and independents should be prepared, however, for the truth. American combat brigades cannot be withdrawn completely from Iraq. The Gulf War ended in 1991. We still maintain a robust troop presence in Kuwait. World War II ended sixty-three years ago; we still maintain bases in Europe and Japan. The Korean War ended in 1953 and our military is pledged to defend South Korea. Without crew-served weapons such as tanks, the Iraqi Army is no better than a militia.An American withdrawal of combat troops from Iraq could tempt the Iranian government to invade as a challenge to the new president. In that event, the quagmire could become a whirlpool that sucks Israel, the Sunni-Arab states, and more precious American troops into the mistake known as Bush's War. As the era of the electronic mass communications industry dawned, during the presidential primary of 1920, Baltimore journalist and nitric acid wit H. L. Menken wrote: The larger the mob, the harder the test.In small areas, before small electorates, a first-rate man occasionally fights his way through, carrying even the mob with him by force of his personality. But when the field is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second and third hand, and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt, then all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre -- the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron. On January 16th, 2008, Bush's Brain spoke in Houston to the Republican National Committee about the upcoming presidential election. During Karl Rove's 3,200 word speech, he never mentioned George Bush: not once. George Bush, the kinda guy you'd like to have a beer with, except he's an alcoholic.What, me worry?
I have three Civil War books that have been published (see: www.threequartercadillac.info). What the North fought for, and what the South reconciled to, the greatness of the United States of America, has been waning since the Carter administration. Bush's War is accelerating the bankruptcy of our country like the American Revolution hastened the bankruptcy of Bourbon France which caused the French Revolution. Abraham Lincoln said: "If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher." Quoting from my unpublished book "Three Quarter Cadillac:" In 1864, at the Battle of Kenesaw Mountain, Joseph P. Putnam, Company F, 55th Illinois, scrambled over the field to secure a stretcher for Captain Jacob Augustine, "but before he had gone many steps a bullet pierced his thigh, breaking the bone and severing an artery. A sweet singer, jolliest of messmates, loved for his invincible good nature, respected by all for his manliness, courage, and cheerful attendance upon duty, his heroic death was in harmonious keeping with his life. The rosy-cheeked, curly-headed boy knew that his wound was mortal, and told a comrade, George W. Curfman, who attempted to aid him, that he had but a brief time to live. Then he began singing: 'We're going home to die no more.' As his life's blood pulsed away his voice grew fainter and fainter, but murmured the refrain until forever stilled on earth." 1 High Private Putnam and his comrades, "knights of the knapsack," with their love of country, service and sacrifice, preserved the Union. With blood and powder they defended the Constitution that their fore-bearers had promulgated. Decades after the Civil War, First Sergeant James A. Wright, Company F, 1st Minnesota, wrote: "It was no trivial thing to offer to die that the nation might continue to live." 2 With regard to the assumption that the Baathist regime possessed weapons of mass of destruction, Gen. James "Spider" Marks, who was tasked with the mission of finding the 946 identified sites and disposing of the weapons, offered these trenchant remarks concerning the priority the Bush administration placed on his role and the presumptive reason for war. "'No one in Rumsfeld's general chain of command seemed to know who I was. I mean, I was a senior general officer, but...I'm sure I was below their noise level'...Pointedly, he added, 'I was taught when I made general officer that I didn't have a noise level. Everything was mine. I had to give a shit about every issue, because if I didn't, something critical would slip through.' Let me get this straight, I [Jeff Stein] said to Marks: After all the talk about Saddam Hussein over the previous two years, the officials responsible for planning the actual war no longer cared about WMD? 'Well,' he said, continuing to put it like a soldier, 'they ostensibly cared, but their give-a-shit level was really low.'" 62
Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
