Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
February 25, 2008 at 04:52:13

Must Read 1   News 1   Valuable 1   View Ratings | Rate It

In "Charlie Wilson's War" Carter's CIA Funding Islamic Terror to Sucker in the Soviets is Left Out

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Jay Janson (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

“In its effort to lionize Charlie Wilson as the savior of the Afghan people, who are scarcely present, the film omits a few inconvenient facts. The maverick congressman came onto the scene well after the Democratic administration of Jimmy Carter had decided to give financial and military support to the Islamicists engaged in guerilla warfare against the Soviet-backed regime in Kabul, which had come to power in a military coup in 1978. This preceded the Soviet invasion of the country in 1979.

 

The Carter regime, which hoped a war in Afghanistan would be the USSR’s Vietnam, began funding and arming the most right-wing fundamentalists, the ideological ancestors of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden.

 

Nor does the film mention that Carter’s successor, Ronald Reagan, was an enthusiastic promoter of the fundamentalists and that his CIA director, William Casey, is deserving of the title “founding father” of al Qaeda for his campaign of globally recruiting Islamic militants to come to Afghanistan to fight the anti-Communist cause. (Carter’s national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski gloated in a 1998 interview that some “stirred-up Moslems” were a small price to pay for the collapse of the Soviet Union, the “liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War.”)

 

Far from being an unsung champion as film director Nichols would have it, Wilson was a pawn on the global chessboard—a bagman for those responsible for nearly two decades of civil war and the destruction of Afghan society.”

In a Los Angles Times review of the book, Chalmers Johnson—the well-known academic, one-time consultant to the CIA and author of Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire—wrote a scathing review of both Crile’s book and the Nichols movie:

"Wilson’s activities in Afghanistan led directly to a chain of blowback that culminated in the attacks of September 11, 2001 and led to the United States’ current status as the most hated nation on Earth."

 

Carter signed the finding on July 3, 1979, six months before the Soviet invasion, and he did so on the advice of his national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, in order to try to provoke a Russian incursion. Brzezinski has confirmed this sequence of events in an interview with a French newspaper, and former CIA Director [today Secretary of Defense] Robert Gates says so explicitly in his 1996 memoirs

 

Among those supporting the Afghans (in addition to the U.S.) was the rich, pious Saudi Arabian economist and civil engineer, Osama bin Laden, whom we helped by building up his al Qaeda base at Khost. When bin Laden and his colleagues decided to get even with us for having been used, he had the support of much of the Islamic world. This disaster was brought about by Wilson’s and the CIA’s incompetence as well as their subversion of all the normal channels of political oversight and democratic accountability within the U.S. government. Charlie Wilson’s war thus turned out to have been just another bloody skirmish in the expansion and consolidation of the American empire — and an imperial presidency. The victors were the military-industrial complex and our massive standing armies. The billion dollars’ worth of weapons Wilson secretly supplied to the guerrillas ended up being turned on ourselves."

Johnson adds that

“there is ample evidence that, when it comes to the freedom of women, education levels, governmental services, relations among ethnic groups, and quality of life—all were infinitely better under the Afghan communists than under the Taliban or the present government of President Hamid Karzai, which evidently controls little beyond the country’s capital, Kabul.”

In the book, page 14, George Crile makes it seem otherwise " Soviet invasion surprised and radicalized Carter, who suddenly saw the USSR as evil and Brezhnev as not rational. " Did Crile not know how hundreds of thousands reading the Internet know that Carter funded, armed and trained the hill tribes starting in June or July to sucker in the Soviets in December?

In the movie several CIA grouped characters and Charlie himself in the movie joke openly about how much they love to kill Russians. The movie featured such talk as admirable, portrayed as swashbuckling and manly. The CIA comes across as 'good,' like James Bond, cute and loveable, a bit roguish, but exciting, and definitely something to cheer for.

This article is the third written on the subject, each time motivated by something in the news and in addition has written to Jimmy Carter through his Carter Center.

Jimmy Carter enjoys prestige and respect for his work as a dedicated promoter of peaceful solutions. What an enormous contribution to peace Carter could make by enlightening us on the process of covert murderous intention during his presidency. If he would just 'fess up' about his now no longer secret orders funding, training and equipping the fundamentalist tribes of the mountains against the socialist (women liberating) government in Kabul, a full six months BEFORE the first units of the Soviet army entered Afghanistan. One would imagine that Carter himself would see the great value of an honest admission and welcome an opportunity to unburden himself of whatever feelings of anguish and self-recrimination he might be experiencing.

Peace loving Jimmy, please tell us candidly of the times when you weren’t for peace and the mitigating circumstances thereof. Help us understand that the roots of today's genocidal belligerencies go way back to a history of nefarious foreign policy.

May heaven grant that this in bad taste low level heartless ‘entertainment’ over the bodies of Afghans awakens a desire in Jimmy Carter’s soul to explain and hopefully condemn how this insidious use of CIA to instigate terror came to be. We are supposed to be entering an era of change.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Let Jimmy Carter enlighten us on the U.S. origin of the ‘War on Terror'

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Musician and writer, who has lived and worked on all the continents and whose articles on media have been published in China, Italy, England and the US, and now resides in New York City.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Accountability Empire"
The uses of PERC: (Program Effectiveness
by Ernest G Palola


Number of pages: 133
Publisher: Office of Research and Evaluation, Empire State College

The methodology of PERC: (Program Effectiveness
by Ernest G Palola


Number of pages: 124
Publisher: Office of Research and Evaluation, Empire State College

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

And of course ... by Mr M on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:45:27 AM
The film and the book had a point of view by Maxwell on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:25:37 PM
Yes, of course it's fair to see it precisely as an "evil by Richard Mynick on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:53:42 PM
Hollywood is Pro-America? by larry booth on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:53:57 PM
Criticism, yes by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:08:39 PM
No, the film does indeed present blatant lies (as the above by Richard Mynick on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:09:43 PM
Wilson is not Carter is not Brezhinski by Maxwell on Wednesday, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:41:59 AM
Yes, it's true that Wilson is not Carter is not Brezhinski - by Richard Mynick on Thursday, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:53:59 PM
You, folks by Mark Sashine on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:48:21 PM
BACKGROUND ON PAKISTAN by Guajolotl on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:24:28 PM
This is documented... by Maxwell on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:45:06 PM
erratum by Guajolotl on Monday, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:26:30 PM
St. Jimmy by Marta Barbosa on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:43:44 AM
I don't buy that. by Maxwell on Wednesday, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:13:15 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum