Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 21, 2007 at 06:12:39

View Ratings | Rate It

New Study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By James Fetzer (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Members of Scholars have contributed to a new book that analyses the government's official account, according to which 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacked four commercial airliners, outfoxed the most sophisticated air-defense system in the world, and committed these atrocities under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan. Entitled, THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), it includes photographs of the hit point before and after the upper floors collapsed, the crucial frame from the released videos, and views of the clear, smooth, and unblemished lawn.

"Don't be taken in by photos showing damage to the second floor or those taken after the upper floors collapsed, which happened 20-30 minutes later," Fetzer said. "In fact, debris begins to show up on the completely clean lawn in short order, which might have been dropped from a C-130 that was circling above the Pentagon or placed there by men in suits who were photographed carrying debris with them." The most striking is a piece from the fuselage of a commercial airliner, which is frequently adduced as evidence.

James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia in 1995. "It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact." Fetzer has been so impressed with his research he has invited Hanson to submit his study to Scholars for consideration for publication on its web site, 911scholars.org.

"The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the study of 9/11," Fetzer said. "Those who persist in maintaining that a Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired. Unless," he added, "they want to mislead the American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places this issue 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/

McKnight Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, Duluth; Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth; Editor, Assassination Research.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "9 11 Coverups"
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé
by David Ray Griffin

$20.00
Lowest New Price $12.82

Number of pages: 358
Publisher: Olive Branch Press

Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-up of 9/11
by Barrie Zwicker

$24.95
Lowest New Price $11.75

Number of pages: 416
Publisher: New Society Publishers

Blowback, 9/11, and Cover-Ups
by Rodney Stich

$25.00
Lowest New Price $21.48

Number of pages: 354
Publisher: Silverpeak Enterprises, Inc.

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Other information some may find useful by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 9:00:23 AM
Judy Wood's Site and Web Browser Problems by CB Brooklyn on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 9:53:47 AM
Thanks CB by Tony Forest on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:41:59 AM
Re: Pentagon Strike by Joe Plummer on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 2:34:49 PM
If No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, then by Alessandro Machi on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 2:39:53 PM
When the stonewall around you falls, no need to jump ... by meremark on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 3:45:53 PM
Meremark, IGotta Agree With Pretty Much Everytthing You Said by RCG on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 5:00:04 PM
Jon Stewart IS terrific, IMHO by meremark on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 8:00:23 PM
Just saying ... by meremark on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 8:02:41 PM
bravo, 911 pilots for truth by k kelly on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 5:50:02 PM
Where Did It Go? by Dom Jermano on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 6:11:24 PM
Join in, make your mark, do what you can, push, push ... by meremark on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 8:43:14 PM
Well...When You Put It Like That... by RCG on Thursday, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:57:10 PM
I looked around at Woods site for a while by Blue Pilgrim on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:52:48 AM
Dr Wood says not to get distracted by calculations by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 3:25:46 AM
Yes, by richard on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 6:14:45 AM
What are calculations supposed to prove? by CB Brooklyn on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:22:24 PM
if that's what she says by Blue Pilgrim on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 6:16:09 PM
that's a poor attempt by CB Brooklyn on Saturday, Jun 23, 2007 at 12:27:07 AM
CHENEY by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 9:22:12 AM
New Study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757... by syed mahdi on Friday, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:48:47 PM
Huh, by Sasha on Monday, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:20:50 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum