Too late ...

Whoopee ... way too late. The 2000 elections were stolen too. When are we going to have someone of import come out and say that? And if one did what would be done about it? I can answer that - nothing.

Fact of the matter they ("they" being the powers that be) don't want a fair verifiable election process. For if we had fair elections they wouldn't be the "powers that be" any longer. We'd have a great distribution of wealth, environmental protections, renewable energy, universal health care, bridges that don't collapse, free schools that actually educate, a judiciary that upholds the rule of law and no more wars for profit.

If voting could change things - they'd make it illegal.

by Mr M (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 1056 comments) on Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 11:16:15 AM
 

So that explains

the 3% "switch" for Bush that happened in the middle of the night...when no one was watching...

by Susan Nelsen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 227 comments) on Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 12:12:35 PM
 

IF Elections COULD ACTUALLY Change Anything...

then elections would be illegal.

.

.

.

.

.

"Go shopping."

-- George Waterboard Bush

by mrk * (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 294 comments) on Saturday, December 15, 2007 at 12:15:38 PM
 

Why we must vote

A lot of people think that if the vote is stolen anyway, why vote? The answer is complex. Everything from the many thousands of Americans out there trying to stop as much of the theft and disenfrachisement as possible which partly worked in 2006 to the critical importance of a significantly wider margin. Flipping the votes or eliminating them (undervotes) becomes increasingly difficult as the margin widens. This article concentrates on Ohio which dealt with the Electoral College votes. It has to be emphasized that key swing states and other vulnerable states such as  little Delaware contributed to the "popular majority" for Bush that discouraged legal challenge. But in many places, particularly where there was no paper trail, the exit polls owned by an MSM consortium, showed glaring differences, consistently for Bush (prior to a 1:30 am Nov. 3rd adjustment). In Delaware, Kerry won. But there was a 5% difference than that in the exit polls. Analyzing the unrevised exit polls, Kerry won the popular vote by over 5 million. Some of those red states were actually blue states. There would have been several additional million votes if the mostly minority voters had not been prevented from voting. Rather than throw in the towel, each of us must protest by voting and making it as hard for the Republicans to steal our votes as we can. Heck, the next time, we might even begin getting more enforcement of the voting laws. It is painful and incremental. By voting, what have we got to lose? By NOT voting, what have we got to win?

by Pat Williams (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 82 comments) on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 at 10:12:27 AM