![]() |
By Bev Harris (about the author) Page 2 of 2 page(s)
I was told by one of the Kucinich people that chain of custody has always been completely trustworthy in the past, and that I should stick to securing the memory cards and chips and not get into ballot chain of custody issues. Basing an analysis of the CURRENT chain of custody on past (or imagined) chain of custody perceptions is like saying, "I won't check to see if I locked the door tonight because I have locked it before."
WHAT'S NEXT?
They are recounting Manchester ballots tomorrow.
PREDICTION: They'll match all right. Exactly as Nancy Tobi predicted. This recount will be used to illustrate that the LHS-coded voting machines should be trusted.
It's very difficult to prepare articles with documentation and video while spending days and nights in the field, but I hope to get more information to you shortly about some of the field work of Susan Pynchon and Melisa Urda, who visited New Hampshire election sites asking questions about ballot accounting procedures, memory card storage, and looking into various questions. They obtained a fairly horrific document from LHS Associates.
Stay tuned.
------------------------------------------------------------
Use this link to go directly to full article:
http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/show.cgi?1954/71356
1 | 2
http://www.blackboxvoting.org
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| No comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |