Home
Hot NewsEconCrisisObamaElection IntegrityLGBT GayMediaBiz- EconEdgesGovtReligionsLife/ArtsSecurity WMDs Terror
Rights Justice DemocracyHealthVeterans MilitaryTorture GuantanamoFood/FarmingMideast Iran Iraq Afg PaMid East911Eco EnviroActivismCommunity
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 8, 2007 at 08:52:58

View Ratings | Rate It

Professors Make Legal Challenges to NIST 9/11 World Trade Centre Report

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend
SAVE AS FAVORITE
VIEW FAVORITES

By Andrew Johnson (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

Dr. Judy Wood:  lisajudy@nctv.com, www.drjudywood.com

Dr. Morgan Reynolds: econrn@suddenlink.net , www.nomoregames.net

Dr. Wood’s RFC: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

Dr. Wood’s Appeal: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#wood

Dr. Reynolds’ RFC: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#reynolds

Dr. Reynolds’ Qui Tam Action in full:

http://nomoregames.net/911/federal_case/07cv4612unsealedcomplaint.pdf

NIST’s filings of the RFC’s and responses, including separate actions by Edward Haas and James Gourley can be found at:

http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Re-examine the destruction of the WTC

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Tutor, Assessor, Software Developer 

UK 9/11 Campaigner

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

UNFORTUNATE THAT LAWSUITS SUPPORT DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS by rhalfhill on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 1:25:33 PM
Only DEWs support the data by CB Brooklyn on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 9:49:25 PM
Delusions, Fantaticism, and Lies by Matt on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 4:57:10 PM
missed the real one by gravity32 on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 8:00:56 PM
Not missed by Andrew Johnson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 9:58:55 AM
Andrew, thank you for posting this excellent work! by CB Brooklyn on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 9:53:49 PM
proof of explosives, not beams by gravity32 on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 11:33:42 PM
you're looking at it simplemindedly by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 12:12:31 AM
Dr Legge by Andrew Johnson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 11:14:25 AM
the real request for correction by gravity32 on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 11:39:29 PM
That RFC is Nothing But a Joke!!! by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 12:22:35 AM
Does anyone really believe... by Pappy on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 2:40:42 AM
Andrew Johnson's Report on Legal Challenge to NIST etc by syed mahdi on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 3:00:40 AM
Keep to the science as much as possible... by Andrew Johnson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 4:04:06 PM
Three Excellent Pages by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Sep 10, 2007 at 2:50:52 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum