Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (15 comments)

Professors Make Legal Challenges to NIST 9/11 World Trade Centre Report

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
SAVE AS FAVORITE
VIEW FAVORITES
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

Dr. Morgan Reynolds: econrn@suddenlink.net , www.nomoregames.net

Dr. Wood’s RFC: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

Dr. Wood’s Appeal: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#wood

Dr. Reynolds’ RFC: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#reynolds

Dr. Reynolds’ Qui Tam Action in full:

http://nomoregames.net/911/federal_case/07cv4612unsealedcomplaint.pdf

NIST’s filings of the RFC’s and responses, including separate actions by Edward Haas and James Gourley can be found at:

http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Re-examine the destruction of the WTC

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Tutor, Assessor, Software Developer

UK 9/11 Campaigner

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

UNFORTUNATE THAT LAWSUITS SUPPORT DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS by rhalfhill on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 1:25:33 PM
Only DEWs support the data by CB Brooklyn on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 9:49:25 PM
Delusions, Fantaticism, and Lies by Matt on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 4:57:10 PM
missed the real one by gravity32 on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 8:00:56 PM
Not missed by Andrew Johnson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 9:58:55 AM
Andrew, thank you for posting this excellent work! by CB Brooklyn on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 9:53:49 PM
proof of explosives, not beams by gravity32 on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 11:33:42 PM
you're looking at it simplemindedly by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 12:12:31 AM
Dr Legge by Andrew Johnson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 11:14:25 AM
the real request for correction by gravity32 on Saturday, Sep 8, 2007 at 11:39:29 PM
That RFC is Nothing But a Joke!!! by CB Brooklyn on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 12:22:35 AM
Does anyone really believe... by Pappy on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 2:40:42 AM
Andrew Johnson's Report on Legal Challenge to NIST etc by syed mahdi on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 3:00:40 AM
Keep to the science as much as possible... by Andrew Johnson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2007 at 4:04:06 PM
Three Excellent Pages by CB Brooklyn on Monday, Sep 10, 2007 at 2:50:52 AM