Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   9 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Why the Worst Get on Top -- in Economics and as CEOs

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 4   Well Said 3   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 6/12/14

Become a Fan
  (38 fans)
- Advertisement -

Here is von Hayek's explanation of the three reasons why democracy is inherently perverse.

"There are three main reasons why such a numerous and strong group with fairly homogenous views is not likely to formed by the best but rather by the worst elements of any society. By our accepted moral standards, the principles on which such a group would be selected will be almost entirely negative.

In the first instance, it is probably true that the higher education and intelligence of individuals become, the more their views and tastes are differentiated and the less likely they are to agree on a particular hierarchy of values.

It is a corollary of this that if we wish to find a high degree of uniformity and similarity of outlook, we have to descend to the regions of lower moral and intellectual standards where the more primitive and "common" instincts and tastes prevail.

This does not mean that the majority of people have low moral standards; it merely means that the largest group of people whose values are very similar are the people with low standards.

It is, as it were, the lowest common denominator which unites the largest number of a numerous group is needed, strong enough to impose their views on the values of life on all the rest, it will never be those with highly differentiated and developed tastes it will be those who form the "mass" in the derogatory sense of the term, the least original and independent, who will be able to put the weight of their numbers behind their particular ideals.

If, however, a potential dictator had to rely entirely on those whose uncomplicated and primitive instincts happen to be very similar, their number would scarcely give sufficient weight to their endeavors. He will have to increase their numbers by converting more to the same simple creed.

Here comes in the second negative principle of selection: he will be able to obtain the support of all the docile and gullible, who have no strong convictions of their own but are prepared to accept a ready-made system of values if it is only drummed into their ears sufficiently loudly and frequently.

- Advertisement -

It will be those whose vague and imperfectly formed ideas are easily swayed and whose passions and emotions are readily aroused who will thus swell the ranks of the totalitarian party.

It is in connection with the deliberate effort of the skillful demagogue to weld together a closely coherent and homogeneous body of supporters that the third and perhaps most important negative element of selection enters.

It seems to be almost a law of human nature that it is easier for people to agree on a negative program -- on the hatred of an enemy, on the envy of those better off than on any positive task."

Yes, you read that correctly: democratic government invariably leads to the rule by "demagogues" who manipulate the most immoral segments of society. The core of this immoral coalition consists of "the lowest common denominator" -- the "'mass[es]' in the derogatory sense of the term." The masses consist of the least "educated" and least "intelligent" driven by "primitive instincts."

The unethical leaders add to this core the "docile and gullible." They are easily manipulated by propaganda that creates "a ready-made system of values if it is only drummed into their ears sufficiently loudly and frequently." Their "passions and emotions are readily aroused" by demagogues "who will thus swell the ranks of the totalitarian party."

- Advertisement -

The third component of the totalitarian troika is the "most important negative element." These are the murderous bigots motivated by "hatred of an enemy " the envy of those better off."

Von Hayek is Blighted by his Bigotry

What we are reading, of course, is the class hatred and bigotry common to minor Austrian aristocrats like von Hayek who were born in the 19th century. (The "von" was removed from all Austrian family names by statute when he was a young adult.) The idea of democratic rule by what he viewed as his inferiors appalled von Hayek. The fact that this kind of naked bigotry in this passage that I have quoted at length is viewed by his libertarian devotees as von Hayek's finest work reveals the depths of libertarian hate for and fear of democratic government.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

William K Black , J.D., Ph.D. is Associate Professor of Law and Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Bill Black has testified before the Senate Agricultural Committee on the regulation of financial derivatives and House (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Incredible Con the Banksters Pulled on the FBI

What if the Public Understood How Money Works?

Rajan Calls Krugman "Paranoid" for Criticizing Reinhart and Rogoff's Research | New Economic Perspectives

The Greek Depression, the Troika, and the New York Times (videos)

Will the Chilean People Save the U.S. by Electing Michelle Bachelet?

The Wall Street Journal Still Refuses to Grasp Accounting Control Fraud via Appraisal Fraud


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You echo the theme of Rob Kall and The Corporation... by Richmond Shreve on Thursday, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:50:49 PM
Thanks for providing that background of the Libert... by E. J. N. on Thursday, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:16:33 PM
Dr. Black, I support your thesis generally, in tha... by Paul from Potomac on Thursday, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:33:49 PM
What is it that makes some people need to feel sup... by intotheabyss on Thursday, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:21:57 PM
What is neoliberalism if not a lowest common denom... by Derryl Hermanutz on Thursday, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:03:35 PM
CEOs of most of the world's largest corporations d... by Ethan Hollow on Friday, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:14:45 AM
Yes, and in addition to the sociopath's facile abs... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:51:37 AM
The really dangerous American fascist... is the ma... by Ethan Hollow on Friday, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:18:36 AM
Admittedly, I haven't read much of von Hayek, but ... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:55:59 AM