Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ;
Add to My Group
August 25, 2008 at 03:12:33

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/25/08:

White Paper Justifying Iraq War Written Three Months before Intel Report Arrived

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Michael Collins (about the author)     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

"Bush administration and the Tony Blair government began acting in concert to build support for an invasion of Iraq two to three months earlier than previously understood.

"A comparison of the CIA draft white paper with its publicly released edition shows that all the changes made were in the nature of strengthening its charges against Iraq by inserting additional alarming claims, in the manner of an advocacy, or public relations document.

"The draft and final papers show no evidence of intelligence analysis applied to the information contained."  August 22, 2004

One Final Hope to Avoid a Tragic War

Ultimately, the White House had what it wanted by July 2002.  When the National Intelligence Estimate arrived from an intimidated intelligence community, there was still one hope of a rational outcome on the rush to war.  The NIE delivered to the White House on Oct. 1, 2002 noted that the one scenario in which Iraq would attack the United States involved a U.S. attack on Iraq that threatened Saddam Hussein's survival.

The following is brutally simple.  The one way to cause the hypothesized (and erroneous) claims of Hussein's intent to attack the United States is to go to war and threaten his regime.  Therefore, refraining from war was the best way to protect the United States.

"Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW against the United States, fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger cause for making war.

"Iraq probably would attempt clandestine attacks against the U.S. Homeland if Baghdad feared an attack that threatened the survival of the regime were imminent or unavoidable, or possibly for revenge."  Key Judgments, National Intelligence Estimate, Oct. 2002

That was deleted entirely.  The July White Paper was "complete" and sent to Congress as the evidence justifying the invasion of Iraq.

In the most supreme of ironies, many members of Congress failed to even review the distorted White Paper before voting overwhelmingly to approve the invasion.

Is there any hope that this same legislative body can remedy the great wrong they helped create?  Is there anyone who believes that this or any future White House will move with the urgency necessary to end this war?  Will anyone ever be held to account for this series of premeditated deceptions?

END

This article may be reproduced in whole or in part with attribution of authorship, a link to the article and acknowledgment of any images or other material user.

See full report with links to primary evidence at Scoop Independent News

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Michael Collins is a writer in the DC area who researches and comments on the corruptions of the new millennium. His articles focus on the financial manipulations of The Money Party, the abuse of power by government, and features on elections and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

The pile keeps getting deeper by Mr M on Monday, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:45:15 AM
You're the ultimate credible source - a CITIZEN. Kudos! by Michael Collins on Monday, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:14:26 PM
Re: White Paper Justifying Iraq War by Munich on Monday, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:09:25 PM
Thanks. It's doing quite well out there by Michael Collins on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:02:43 AM
Am I reading this wrong? by Ron R. on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:14:05 AM
Yes by Sam Adams on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:28:43 AM
Good point by Michael Collins on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:55:41 AM
It's worse news for the WH and bolsters Bugliosi's case by Michael Collins on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:51:53 AM
I'm still not convinced. by Ron R. on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:41:35 PM
In any event... by Ron R. on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:56:18 PM
I can see your point by Sam Adams on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:30:44 PM
... by Ron R. on Tuesday, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:01:40 PM
btw Good work on the article by Ron R. on Wednesday, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:22:40 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum