Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend 1 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

What a Navy Seal's Testimony Says About the Maturity of American Justice

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 9/7/12

- Advertisement -

As for the possible damage to any relevant office, we begin by asking whether the context itself is also relevant. And of course it is, for there is every reason to believe that wrongfully withheld truth is an ipso facto injury not only to the office but to the undergirding principles, never mind the implied insult to the sovereign whose ultimate authority must also be reprised so as not to be further corroded. To the extent that the publication of this book exposes what amounts not to dangerous risk-taking but to embarrassment only, the provisional conclusion can only be that the prior damage done has to that extent been repaired by a so-called crime. Accordingly, it becomes a tad difficult to simultaneously entertain accusations of damage to the office(s).

Concluding unscientific postscript

I have been approached by those who believe that I am trying to tie the hands of officeholders, or that by enforcing stewardship standards I thereby deplete the moral value of self-help and innate honesty. These are very easy accusations for ignorant people to put forth, and I would only ask whether the absence of that ignorance would find us still accused. I seriously doubt it, and here's why: stewardship exists to serve all parties related to the office. It serves the grantor by whose auspices the office receives its authority; it serves the officeholder who requires autonomy to use specialized understanding; it serves the principle giving rise to the office-beneficiary relation, and it assures the beneficiary of the highest standard of service possible, one that without question could not have been possible absent the office, ergo absent the stewardship.

In other words, knowing what stewardship is about obviates a good bit of nonsense. It does not pay to be ignorant of stewardship, and it especially does not pay the legal community to be grossly ignorant of the single most important concept undergirding legal obligations. One day we shall hope to shame them into reprising the teaching curricula at our law schools. One day we may even convince judges that the law and its service to the citizenry are more important than assuring CEOs the prerogatives to maximize profits at the expense of all those other things the courts are supposed to uphold, directly or otherwise. We are in a bad way, and the composite of secrecy and political correctness in government and military dealings offers the strongest evidence of all that we need an overhaul.

The current practice of law simply does not pass the smell test for stewardship or, therefore, justice. It's high time judges practiced enough stewardship of their offices to at least learn how and why stewardship matters to eighty percent (or so) of the jural and 100 percent of the juridical content of law. Were we all better acquainted with the normative tasks of the legal profession, whistle-blowers would not be despised for being no longer so necessary. Please, lawyers and judges, think over that last remark carefully before you jail and miserably punish more of our bravest patriots.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Next Page  1  |  2


Mr. Herrman is a liberal philosopher specializing in structural metaphysics, where he develops methodologies enabling him to derive valid and verifiable answers not only in matters of the ontology of reality, but also in real-world concerns for (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How Republicans Live with Themselves: The Entitlement of Hypocrisy

How Republicans Live with Themselves: The Honor of Thieves

Cynicism: More Dangerous than Psychopathology

The Zimmerman Trial: Evidence that the South Has not Outgrown its Lust for the Finer Fruits of Faux Righteousness

What Incites Occupy Movements and What They in Turn Must Display: Contempt

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, and the Rocks of Justified Discontent


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The Seals have a unique insignia that I tried to c... by C. S. Herrman on Friday, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:55:54 AM
Where ignorance reigns in converting a MS Word pic... by C. S. Herrman on Friday, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:04:09 AM
Another fantastic article. It reminds me of what h... by Kim Cassidy on Friday, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:36:33 PM