Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (2 comments)

We could descend into violence against a President again.

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

FreedonWorks originated in 2004, as the article says, "by the merger of Armey's corporate-funded Citizens for a Sound Economy, which had helped defeat President Clinton's health reform proposals in 1993-94, with another conservative Republican advocacy group. It initially gained notice in 2005 for its extensive involvement in then-President Bush's attempts to privatize Social Security, using methods that included busing its members to attend town hall meetings on the issue and attempting to pass them off as ordinary citizens."

If they had succeeded in privatizing Social Security, everyone but the top 1% would be in a world full of hurt after the recent downturn in the markets. They should have been ashamed for that and quit, but ethical concerns were never a priority for Armey.

It grew from there until now Armey can have his own trained staff of loud, ignorant, blowhards carted around anywhere -- yelling inanities at the top of their lungs, and disrupting logical discussions, against anything they don't like, while pretending to be local yokels.

The GOP propaganda effort is an inter-connected, well organized system.

The article "Glenn Beck keeps changing his 9/12 Tea Party Protest crowd size estimates" at

http://www.examiner.com/x-5738-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m9d15-Video--Glenn-Beck-keeps-changing-his-912-Tea-Party-Protest-crowd-size-estimates

states "The 9/12 distortion seems to never end with Glenn Beck. First he endlessly hyped the event while Fox News simultaneously claimed that the movement had no support. Then Beck painted the movement as an exemplification of his nine principles even though the actions of the protesters violate his claim. Now Beck is continuing to mislead on the crowd size at the event.

This time Beck's worst enemy may be himself. Yesterday Glenn Beck ended up with an official estimate of about 500,000 people attending the event. Even this figure was vastly inflated compared to disinterested parties who have estimated 60,000-70,000 in attendance. However today's Glenn Beck must strongly disagree with yesterday's Glenn Beck because now the same man is saying over 1.7 million attended the rally.

Once more Beck has no real support for his claim. He claims a "university" did a study of the crowd size but he curiously unable to actually name the university. Perhaps it was the university of Glenn Beck which performed the mathematical calculations. If so, the University of Glenn Beck needs to explain why they are more than tripling their crowd estimates in just one day. Beck's new number even doubles the number released by the conservative group FreedomWorks who largely sponsored the event.

How dumb are his audience, the people who have caused this moron to be a force in the US? This is simple math but for these dolts nothing adds up.

They all -- Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly -- repeat the same message so that the red-staters hear the same lies about the evil Democrats continually. How could Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly surpass Beck's stupidity? Their audiences are the same as Beck's who recently proclaimed "If it wasn't for Fox or talk radio we'd be done as a republic. There are people in the administration -- two of the president's czars -- that want to shut down the voices of talk radio and Fox and make it all NPR."

Primarily, these GOP propagandists can't talk policies so they attack Obama with simple-minded assaults that their ignorant audience can easily understand, such as "killing grannies", which obviously was never part of a health care proposal. Having content free attacks allows the attackers the ability to disrupt other policy meetings without becoming familiar with the policy.

The Senate might wait until next year to vote on legislation that would require companies to pay for the right to emit greenhouse gases. When it does begin the process, the GOP will have the same crew doing the same tactics and the Democrats will congenially endure it all.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What about the crumbling of America by Dave Francis on Monday, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:04:04 PM
What about the crumbling of America by Dave Francis on Monday, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:04:23 PM