Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Was the Shooter on Antidepressant Drugs?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (18 fans)

Paroxetine (Paxil) "10.3 times"

Fluoxetine (Prozac) "10.9 times"

Varenicline (Chantix) "18 times" (Time)

As Dr. Breggin calls it on his website:  

"Antidepressants cause emotional anesthesia and numbing or sometimes euphoria, providing a fleeting, artificial relief from emotional suffering. In the long run, all psychiatric drugs tend to disrupt the normal processes of feeling and thinking, rendering the individual less able to deal effectively with personal problems and with life's challenges.   They worsen the individual's overall mental condition and produce potentially irreversible harm to the brain."  

Breggin provided expert testimony and dire warnings to a congressional committee and cautioned against dispensing antidepressants to military personnel out of a very real fear of resulting violence by well-armed troops.

Even the FDA has had to impose stronger warnings on these medicines over the years, in response to the real-world data.   The 2007 update to the "Black Box" warnings, which are mandatory and included with all antidepressants, says:

"Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk: Patients, their families, and their caregivers should be encouraged to be alert to the emergence of anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia (psychomotor restlessness), hypomania, mania, other unusual changes in behavior, worsening of depression, and suicidal ideation, especially early during antidepressant treatment and when the dose is adjusted up or down. Families and caregivers of patients should be advised to look for the emergence of such symptoms on a day-to-day basis, since changes may be abrupt. Symptoms such as these may be associated with an increased risk for suicidal thinking and behavior and indicate a need for very close monitoring and possibly changes in the medication." (FDA, emphasis added.)

The United States abandoned its mentally ill citizens back in the 1980s.   Now they live under bridges.   I see them with their tent city near my favorite Chinese restaurant.   The great shining city on the hill doesn't give a damn who's living outdoors now.   The mental illness stigma has worked its way through the rest of society, but not in the obvious way.  

People don't reject "treatment" as long as it's a pill you can take, a brain fix-all.   This convenience culture idea of the quick fix is what has lived on, and now psychiatric "treatment" consists primarily of trying various drugs on patients, having them report the way the drugs affected them, and then trying other drugs.   Repeat ad infinitum.   This guinea-pig approach to psychiatry is what I have witnessed for many years, and with a variety of different psychiatrists.   They no longer seek out the underlying traumas of patients, as in the old quaint days.   It is all about the drugs today, and nothing else is even discussed.

Psychiatrists are corporate America's drug pushers.  

Banning Guns For Citizens?

Now I'm going to get a lot of hostile responses for bucking the knee-jerk hysteria about banning assault rifles that's going around.   It seems to me like this issue was custom-tailored to distract the nation from the "fiscal cliff" backroom betrayals currently gutting your Social Security and Medicare inside the centers of power.   There are numerous massacres, unfortunately.   The media volume generated by this particular one is like a tsunami and changes the top story away from the machinations of the White House and Congress, where their deal-making could potentially kill many, many more people than the occasional shooting spree.   They actually do kill many, many more children in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere, but that's a different article.

I see no problem clamping down on high-capacity assault rifles.   But I don't for a second believe that's going to change anything.   What exactly can you do with an assault rifle, that you can't do with a thousand other different kinds of guns?   Reloading isn't really that time-consuming or difficult.   Multiple weapons are easy to obtain, especially if one is motivated enough and doesn't care if they make it out alive.   So how does that solve the problem?

Ah, the nuclear option -- ban all the guns.   That's next.

There's an interesting idea.   With 300,000,000 guns in America, it should be no problem to just collect them all.   Criminals would be first to line up at the weapon depository and rape scan center.   Once the criminals are disarmed, things will go smoothly.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Political Film Blog Author of HELL OF A DEAL: A Supernatural Satire, a tale of Hollywood's accommodation with torture and militarism.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is This the Man Who "Radicalized" Dzhokhar Tsarnaev?

The U.N. Would Never Lie to George Monbiot

The Future Children of Fukushima

Genocide and the Native American Experience

Nuclear Nightmare Worsens

Do I trust Christopher Nolan or his Batman?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

click here... by Joe Giambrone on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:33:49 PM
Are we going along with the conn cop's previously-... by Michael Rose on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:50:43 PM
Do you have evidence that Lanza was on antidepress... by Daniel Vasey on Thursday, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:57:25 PM
Look.  You want me to compile what government... by Joe Giambrone on Thursday, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:28:06 PM