In the late evening of 21 March, police blew off the window shutters of Merah's apartment with a grenade. Soon after, two shots were heard. And no more was heard from Merah. The rest, you can figure out for yourself.
It is almost certain that Merah was shot dead at that time. The following 12 hours and ridiculous "shoot-out" as presented above were clearly theatre, designed to keep the French public enthralled and in fear, and to allow the security forces and politicians time to get their story straight. The problem is, they can't seem to do that. According to a 'judicial source' on Friday, 23rd March, now Merah was killed by two bullets - one to his front left side and one that passed through his stomach. His bulletproof vest was also, it is now claimed, hit by several bullets. On the other hand, according to RAID chief Amaury de Hautecloque, the police in Merah's apartment had only non-lethal weapons, but still, 300 rounds were fired, apparently now by Merah, with three Colt 45 handguns. The RAID chief then said something which further contradicts the official story, to say the least:
"I gave the order to return fire only with stun grenades ," he explained. "But he moved forward into the apartment and tried to kill my men. It was probably one of these snipers who killed him."Stun grenades are flashbangs. They cannot be fired from the automatic rifles we've all been told, up till now, that the RAID officers targeted Merah with. De Hautecloque's ambivalent throw-away line about it being "probably one of those snipers who killed him" is totally implausible. Is he now telling us that he doesn't know who killed Merah?
Nothing about this story being spun by the French government and press makes sense. Elsewhere it's still being reported, by the French police, that Merah "opened fire on [us] before jumping out the window of his first-floor apartment, still firing as he fell. He was shot in the head." Really? Then why, according to this report, are there bullet wounds in his arms and legs??
At this point, it is clear that they are just piling lies upon lies, hoping people will be too scared and confused to sift a logical timeline of events from the saga. They have an answer for everything, of course. When pressed on why the French government hadn't arrested Merah before now, given that they were tracking Merah and his "known links to al Qaeda", the French Prime Minister gave this glib sycophantic excuse:
"There was no single element allowing to detain Mohamed Merah," Mr Fillon told French radio. "We don't have the right in a country like ours to permanently monitor without judicial authorisation someone who hasn't committed an offence ... We live in a state of law."In my article with Niall Bradley on the French state 'cult-hunting' organisation MIVILUDES, I made a pretty clear-cut case that the real goal of manufacturing a 'cult' hysteria in France was essentially to control the thoughts and beliefs of the French people.
As a result of the Toulouse shootings, laws will soon be passed in France that criminalise "ideological indoctrination" and "apologists for terrorism". It doesn't take a genius to realise that such broad terms can, and very likely will, be used to silence (in one way or another) anyone attempting to educate themselves about, and speak out against, Western government warmongering and war crimes. Indeed, the true masterminds of global terrorism - the Israelis - have recently given a example of how this process works. When Baroness Ashton made the mistake of associating Palestinian children murdered by the Israeli military with the children gunned down in a Jewish school in Toulouse, she was, according to the Israeli government, guilty of "ideological indoctrination" and "being an apologist for terrorism", and they called for her to resign. Simple expressions of a shared humanity and empathy for our fellow human beings, and an utter rejection of the psychopathic destructive ideology, is slated to become a criminal offense in our world. And it will, if we sit back and allow it to happen.
In her stunningly prescient (given these events) recent article How is the World Going to End in 2012? Laura spelled out what 'The end of the World' in 2012 really means:
The world is ending in 2012. That is, the final implementation of the fascist, totalitarian New World Order will be accomplished this year and you will be in that "New World" that the global elite have designed for you, and planned to implement for a very long time now. Oh, indeed, similar New World Order's have been staged in the past on smaller scales, but this time it's global because they are all in on it together! Former New World Order's didn't really fail, even if they ostensibly fell; they just passed the torch around for millennia, spreading the disease, growing the sickness in society, until finally, now, with global communication and incredible weapons of destruction in their hands, they are ready to finalize the Faustian bargain that you, the people, signed with your blood. [...]
It is, of course, remotely possible that those who are able to accomplish this task of rebuilding social connections based on the new evolutionary standard of accounting for pathology in the equations, will evolve and survive if they can last through the next two years. Those who do not evolve will perish. No rapture, Jesus or aliens; no cavalry to the rescue; no ascension to the 5th dimension; no waking up of humanity and playing nice in the sandbox.