Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 5 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

General News

The TV Ad "Air War" Escalates Decimating Democracy

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/21/12

- Advertisement -

The Republicans came up with the deceptive SuperPACS but the Democrats, after condemning them, joined right in!

From April through September, Romney for President aired slightly more than 144,000 ads on broadcast TV. The outside groups supporting him ran nearly 250,000.

That's 250,000 ads, many focused on just 9 key so-called battleground states. They are aimed mostly at undecided voters--often the least informed. The Romney campaign reportedly is spending $85,000 dollars day blasting away at President Obama

These ads also benefit/enrich the media, according to the Global Post.

"The massive ad buys from both campaigns are welcome revenue source for local TV stations. The International Business Times reports that political ad sales are a bright spot in an otherwise weak market. Spending on local TV ads beat expectations and rose by nearly 10 percent in the second quarter of 2012."

The odd thing is that there no definitive research proving these ads are effective, "It is phenomenally difficult to measure with precision what the effect of advertising is," said Ken Goldstein, professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "But advertising very, very much matters at the margin."   Sadly, elections play big on TV but exist in the margin of our real concerns.

This advertising pollution is partly responsible for the superficial TV coverage that resembles coverage of horse races.

The campaign has also been likened to a stage show. James A. Thurber writes in Campaigns and Elections American Style , "Campaigns are wars, battles for the hearts and minds, but most importantly for the votes of the American people.

- Advertisement -

Presidential campaigns as wars or battles seem an appropriate metaphor when we consider the extensive strategies and negative tactics employed by presidential candidates to win the nation's highest office. And yet a campaign is also an elaborate form of entertainment--a stage show--with the players often acting as puppets whose strings are being pulled at precise moments behind the curtain."

When asked about these ads, many voters are sarcastic and critical but the campaigns have so much invested in the game, that they don't really listen to what the critics or ordinary people have to say. Campaigns spawn an industry of political consultants, researchers and operatives, who   have a stake in all this spending.

In an election where creating jobs is big issue, few of the paid pundits on the networks comment on how politics has become a business, creating lots of jobs, albeit temporary ones. Many of the underlings hope that if their guy wins, they will get a cushy government job. Idealism has nothing to do with their participation.

David Sirota explains on the website Salon that "The breathtaking speed of this political transformation (towards mega-money in politics) reflects the larger one-percent-ization of our economy. ". the rich got so much richer than the rest of us, and they are therefore better positioned to dominate politics with their checkbooks. Indeed, as campaign finance records show, this year's stunning influx of cash isn't coming primarily from small donors interested in democratic engagement -- it is coming from the fat cats.

These are donors -- or, better yet, sponsors -- who don't altruistically give money but who instead shrewdly invest it, in this case in candidates from whom they expect a return. And whether that return comes in the form of pre-election speeches promoting special-interest policies or post-election bills that provide windfalls to politically connected industries, the corrupt campaign finance system forcing candidates to rely on these sponsors means the investments almost always pay off.

- Advertisement -

This influence-buying explains why, for all the attempts to stress supposed differences, the two presidential candidates essentially agree on the major economic issues their Big Money financiers care about, from Social Security cuts (for them) to free trade deals (more of them) to regulations (less of them) to corporate tax rates (lower them)."

They look alike. Romney and Obama are both tall, articulate and aggressive, but when you listen closely, they often sound alike.   Yes, there are stylistic differences and rhetorical distinctionsm but both are seeking to be perceived as centrists, focused more on dumbing it down and   dumping on each other than offering bold reforms.

Third parties are not welcome in the spectacle. Last week, the Green Party's Presidential candidate Jill Stein was arrested for protesting her exclusion from the political debates.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

News Dissector Danny Schechter is blogger in chief at Mediachannel.Org He is the author of PLUNDER: Investigating Our Economic Calamity (Cosimo Books) available at Amazon.com. See Newsdisssector.org/store.htm.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel Gives All Jews A Bad Name

Is There A Threat of Fascism in the USA?

Free Marketers Going After Occupy Wall Street --Danny Schechter

COG OR COA: WHY IS OBAMA MORPHING INTO BUSH 2?

WHO OWNS OUR MEDIA AND WHY IT MATTERS

WERE THE BANKS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR THE BANKERS TOO BIG TO JAIL?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

All paid advertising should be banned 1 month befo... by Scott Baker on Sunday, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:21:06 AM
forever.   There are too many great OEN ... by Tom Madison on Sunday, Oct 21, 2012 at 5:43:47 PM
... by Deborah Dills on Sunday, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:01:19 PM
Along with George Soros-to start WWIII, mass incar... by Deborah Dills on Sunday, Oct 21, 2012 at 9:29:42 PM