3
2
2
Figure 1: The latest recommended Schematic for the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit, by Glen Lettenmaier. The "R3" 10 Ohm "LOAD Resistor" at the left represents the actual heating element. "Q1" is the "IRFPG50" MOSFET semiconductor.
Figure 2: A collection of several homemade 10 Ohm Resistive / Inductive Heating Elements built by Glen Lettenmaier using "Ni Cr" resistive wire around a glass tube, doped with thermal coating (Note: there should be a one wire-width space between each individual winding).
Figure 3: A typical screen-shot view of the Waveforms seen when the circuit is properly tuned, from one of the Model TDS3054C Digital Phosphor Oscilloscopes provided for this use by the Tektronix Corporation.
Figure 4: Expanded time-base view of the same signals. Full explanation of the channels and probe Test Points are available at the Energetics Forum thread (see "Links" below).
Rosemary Ainslie and her Idea
Rosemary
graciously agreed to be interviewed for this article from her home in
South Africa, and answer a few brief questions. Much more on her
fascinating and unique Unifying Theories of Physics can be seen at
the links below. It is important to note that she has freely admitted
her controversial theories might someday be proved "wrong": Yet
her perseverance in seeing the empirical effects noted and positively
recorded help prove that there is indeed something of importance here
that requires the mainstream scientific community to take a hard and
honest look at this phenomena... and to not shirk from what they may
find. And when the results are objectively examined, she has so far
been correct in her predictions.
S. Windisch: When you were initially considering a method of empirically demonstrating the anomalous energy release that your theories predicted, what made you first decide on using this particular circuit? Were there other, widely different circuits tested and rejected before the present basic configuration was accepted for testing?
R. Ainslie: This was the first and only. It seemed obvious to me, in terms of the model that the interrupted current would allow a return flow of current from the energy locked in the resistor which would then enable a return of the energy first introduced to the system.
S. Windisch: What were the reactions of the people involved in the earlier South African campaign to gain recognition for the circuit's effects? Such as the five commercial lab companies that were involved in reproducing and verifying it, the other eyewitnesses, and the editors at "Quantum Magazine" who published the article? Were they personally enthusiastic? Did you meet with much open skepticism during this period six years ago?
R. Ainslie: Plenty of interest from industry but none from academics. Industry did much more to explore the questions than even I could manage. Sasol offered a bursary award. All willingly allowed their name to be referenced in that Paper as it related to their request for academic involvement and research. To date not one academic has been prepared to attend a demonstration of the device. Note that MTN Sciencentre requested the apparatus to display during an international conference held around the time after that publication. NOT ONE SCIENTIST attended that demonstration.
S.
Windisch: What can you tell us about your "life experiences" that
brought you here" What drove you to create your Physics model
theory in the first place?
R. Ainslie: I read a book The Dancing
Wu Li Masters. I was gripped and started trying to answer the
questions as they related to energy itself. I had no training so used
symmetries to replace the required mathematics. It seemed to be
enough to support the logic for the development of that model.
