Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
23 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Logic of Emergency: Strategy for a Climate Tea Party

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 1/14/14

opednews.com

For those as yet unaware, eBay and PayPal billionaire Pierre Omidyar is launching a major new journalistic enterprise, supposedly designed to correct the grievous failings of mainstream media. Now any such public-spirited enterprise launched by a billionaire should raise skeptical eyebrows--especially when fulfilling its mission has vast potential conflicts with its funder's business interests. And in fact, if Omidyar hadn't attracted journalists of Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Jeremy Scahill's caliber, I'd laugh to the point of wheezing. However, hope springs eternal (especially for folks desperate as climate activists), and even my inner cynic finds some rational grounds for hoping in Omidyar.

Why? Well, covering the important stories silenced by corrupt corporate media is the model espoused by Omidyar's stable of journalists, and no news story fits this model better than climate change. Giving it vast coverage would do wonders to establish the credibility of Omidyar's new enterprise, and to confirm the integrity of the journalists who've joined him. Moreover, my inner cynic knowingly sneers, climate reporting doesn't directly conflict with Omidyar's business interests, and doing a hero's job in reporting such a vital--and criminally neglected--story might easily divert attention from news Omidyar under-reports because  it hobbles his own capitalist "prime directive." Now Greenwald, clearly touchy about his reputation for integrity, claims such under-reporting won't happen at all; the sheer independence and feistiness of the journalists Omidyar's hired won't let it. Be that as it may, the opportunity to pressure Omidyar to heavily report climate is obvious. And--here's the key for climate activists--climate reporting Greenwald-style won't spare Democrats. A mainstream news service hammering Dems' cowardice and criminal irresponsibility in not passing the Climate Protection Act could be climate activists' meal ticket. Especially if seconded by outraged reports of Republican's reproachably ignorant--or morally leprous--assaults on essential public climate knowledge.

Electing Dems--In Order to Torture Them

So, besides imploring and cajoling (or pressuring, as need be) Steyer and Omidyar to take our side--and spend big bucks on it--what does a climate Tea Party do? I'm sure I've already majorly peed off haters of big, intrusive government, believers in "lifestyle" climate solutions, and ardent advocates of "getting money out of politics" (of which, by the way, I'm one)--and this is only gonna get worse. Why not anger the Green Party for good measure? Here goes. The first step for a climate-action Tea Party is making sure Democrats win in 2014. Say what? Sadly, yes, despite my genuine--and repeated--insistence that we must stop rewarding Democrats for their bad behavior, this last bit of political nose-holding is simply what the climate requires. Why? Well, there's so little time to organize before the 2014 Congressional elections, that no Green I know of has a snowball's hope in hell of being elected; perhaps none even rises to the level of being a "spoiler." And since there's equally little hope of Republicans voting for the Climate Protection Act (passage of which is our Holy Grail), we must place our champion's mantle on the deeply undeserving shoulders of Democrats. The good news is that we intend to torture them once elected--if not considerably well before.

See, the message of the climate-action Tea Party is that we're electing Democrats in 2014 in order to pass the Climate Protection Act, and there will be hell to pay in 2016 if they don't. For after electing Democrats, we transfer our efforts to building the electoral prospects of the Green Party--even using billionaire dollars and Omidyar's news service as needed to do so--and letting Dems know this is exactly what we're up to. And if Greens won't temporarily sacrifice their ideological purity about money for the sake of saving the climate, our climate Tea Party will simply pledge to vote Republican in 2016. But the bottom line is this: if the Dems don't pass the Climate Protection Act after being elected in 2014--and their prospective control of the presidency and both houses of Congress gives them no excuse--our candidate is Anyone But Democrats in 2016.

What's in a Name?

There, in bold outline, is my strategy for a climate-action Tea Party. Many details remain to discuss (like how best to reach Steyer and Omidyar, or how to collaborate with environmental organizations like the Sierra Club or 350.org), but those can wait for future articles. But I'd like to close with addressing another possible design flaw: the "party" name. Doubtless, many folks will be offended by any suggestion of association with the Republican Tea Party (and I get that), just as many were put off by my True Blue Democrats name suggesting (directly contrary to my intent), that we should be loyal to Democrats no matter what. I don't wish to repeat what I now genuinely regard as a mistake, and I by no means insist the group call itself "Climate-Action Tea Party." But maybe we should steal yet another page from the Tea Party and choose a name that lets us wrap ourselves in the American flag. How about "Climate Patriots of America"? I don't insist on that name either, but it would make it harder to stigmatize us as ecoterrorists. Additionally, it would belatedly fulfill my father's long-cherished secret dream: that I become a CPA.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I am a veteran anti-fracking and Occupy Scranton PA activist, most recently founder of the True Blue Democrats progressive revolt movement. However, currently revamping my political strategy in light of experience, I've folded up True Blue (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Frankly, Koch Brothers Deserve the Death Penalty

Obama's Real Legacy: Savior of Corporate Fascism

Fascism without Totalitarianism: America's Present Plight

Piketty, Meet Orwell: Why Modern Oligarchy MUST Turn Fascist

Thom Hartmann's Insane Political Strategy: Whitewashing Cancerous Democrats

Right-Wing Gun Nuts—Our Tame Second Amendment Lapdogs

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

In any earlier (now aborted) political project, Tr... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:13:51 AM
I think your strategy is worth a shot.  But l... by Paul Roden on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:02:07 AM
Paul, thanks deeply for your interest and input.... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:33:40 AM
Breaking out of the framing that has relegated pre... by Philip Zack on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:45:09 AM
Philip, The one big bit of hope I see in Omidya... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:56:20 AM
Excellent article and I hope it leads to great re... by Richard Schwartz on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06:06 PM
Richard, Thanks for your generous compliment. Yo... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:16:11 PM
"If you're not (a) open-minded and (b) deeply focu... by R. A. Landbeck on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:09:09 PM
Hi, R. A. I have to give some hours to my day job... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:28:59 PM
I agree that it is important to elect more Democr... by Richard Schwartz on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:12:15 PM
Hi again, Richard I heard of this organization un... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:25:57 PM
If I haven't already made it abundantly clear, th... by molly cruz on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:15:44 PM
Climate change is something like the Titanic. It r... by Greg Greg on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:21:18 PM
Greg, My point is that some of the "stinking rich... by Patrick Walker on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:52:35 AM
I'm with you Pat. Our present Sisyphus-like c... by (h)ugh wynne on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:18:41 PM
Just lose the Tea Party stuff...I am thinking, it ... by Kyle Christensen on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:42:03 PM
Kyle, I've emphasized the Tea Party only because... by Patrick Walker on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:47:09 AM
Green Tea Party?  Whatever the name, I do be... by Burl Hall on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:56:48 AM
Burl, I sympathize deeply with not wis... by Patrick Walker on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:39:10 AM
I agree that government needs to act to actually C... by Philip Pease on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:26:00 PM
Philip, I'm glad you included the fact... by Patrick Walker on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:44:39 PM
Maybe you're kind of slow.  I held my nose a... by Sorgfelt on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:44:10 PM
It's by no means clear we have access to billion... by Patrick Walker on Wednesday, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:51:30 PM