OpEdNews Op Eds

The Great Enemy of the Truth

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 6 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 3/3/10

Become a Fan
  (38 fans)

People will argue that this is all merely a coincidence, but I agree with Robert A. Heinlein's general assessment regarding coincidence which states that, "Coincidence is a question begging term." In other words, people say something is a coincidence when they are unwilling to investigate the circumstances of an incident with the due diligence it deserves: either because they are lazy, fearful or because it does not fit their preconceived notion of what has occurred.

Even if Lee Harvey Oswald was the "lone gunman," which I personally doubt, he was not the lone person involved in the conspiracy to kill JFK.

First of all, Oswald has the stink of CIA/ONI (Office of Naval Intelligence) all over him, from the time he was a kid in New Orleans.

Second, his "defection" to the Soviet Union has the ham-handed paw prints of the CIA all over it, especially in his return to the United States, and the lack of prosecution when he did return.

Third, his actions after his return to the United States, look mostly like a CIA operative who failed in his mission, and is trying to make himself useful to his government by trying to infiltrate pro-Communist pro-Soviet, or pro-Cuban, organizations in the United States--such as the Fair Play for Cuba Committee--as a CIA/FBI informant.

I believe Oswald being set up as a "patsy" for JFK's murder as his final "reward" for the abject failure of his mission as a "sleeper agent" to the Soviet Union. He was in the position to take the blame for the crime whether he actually shot the President or not. He simply had to die before any "outsider," such as defense counsel, had a chance to speak to him, which certainly would have occurred on Monday morning.

This leads us to poor Jack Ruby.

Jack Ruby is possibly the largest single enigma in the assassination of President Kennedy. A Jewish gangster from Chicago, Jack Rubinstein, aka Jack Ruby, operated at organized crime's periphery in Dallas during the 1950's and early 60's. He claimed to have run numbers for Al Capone when he was a boy.

Ruby initially claimed that he shot Oswald so Jackie Kennedy would not have to return to Dallas for a trial. This claim is, on the face of it, so preposterous that it lacks any credibility. He later told Chief Justice Earl Warren in an interview, that the only way that he could tell the Warren Commission the truth about President Kennedy's murder was if the Commission took him to Washington to testify, and placing him first in protective custody. This would seem to automatically disqualify his initially stated reason for shooting Oswald, because if Ruby could only tell the truth to the Warren Commission in Washington, D.C., under protective custody, by logical extension anything he said to authorities in Dallas most likely would be a lie.

I have often wondered what it was that Jack Ruby did to get himself exiled from Chicago to what was then considered the "cow town" of Dallas? I also wonder what the Mob had on Jack Ruby that allowed them to force Jack Ruby to take out Oswald in such a public manner, with no opportunity to escape?

The "rush to judgment" naming Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman, without any real investigation by the Dallas Police, the FBI, the Secret Service, or the Warren Commission into the possibility of a conspiracy involving any one of a myriad of possible suspects both inside and outside of the American Military-Industrial Complex, was one of the greatest disservices ever performed by law enforcement in this country. I would call it a lynch mob mentality, but in this case, the mob was being led by law enforcement and the judiciary, while those who stood the most to gain from JFK's death, cheered from the sidelines.

We have discussed the pre-assassination set-up; now let us consider the post-assassination cover up.

First, is the simple fact that the provenance and chain of custody of much of the evidence presented to the Warren Commission is, at best, questionable. Missing x-rays, photos, and other evidence--including JFK's brain, or what's left of it, sealed in formalin--are nearly as important as the crime scene (the Presidential limousine), which was being scrubbed down by the Secret Service at the hospital. Then there are the mysterious figures at Bethesda instructing the pathologists conducting JFK's autopsy what to do and what not to do during the autopsy. Finally, there is the mysterious and sudden appearance of a nearly pristine bullet, Commission Exhibit 399 (CE 399), whose striations matched those of Oswald's rifle, on one of the stretchers in Parkland's ER that afternoon.

Besides its questionable provenance, CE 399 has a number of problems. First is the small (less than two-and-a-half grains) amount of mass that was lost from this bullet that supposedly had gone through two men, including several large bones.

Second, it appears that the amount of metal left behind by CE 399 as it traversed the two men's bodies probably exceeds the total mass lost by the bullet. The two largest fragments left in Governor Connally's right wrist--and these are not the only fragments that were left--are, according to the Warren Commission, 2x3 mm and 1x2 mm.

With a very conservative estimate of 0.1 mm thickness for each fragment, and a specific gravity of approximately 10.25 g/cc for the lead alloy of the bullet, you get 0.082g or 82 mg for the weight of those two fragments alone, or 1.27 grains of lead alloy in gun speak. This is conservatively of the mass missing from CE 399, and the actual average thickness of those two fragments is more likely to be 0.2 or 0.3 mm, doubling or tripling the mass of the two fragments. There are also a number of smaller fragments in Connally's wrist, chest, and leg according to his x-rays. I think a proper inventory of the lead fragments in John Connally's body would show he had a far greater mass of bullet fragments in his body than the mass of the lead missing from CE 399.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

Social Capitalism

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This time nostalgia on my part. 1952 in the Autumn... by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:44:37 PM
Thanks for being another voice, Mr. Girard. We can... by Truth Excavator on Wednesday, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:07:46 PM
This clip has footage of the limo driver turning a... by daveys on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:42:36 PM
This clip has footage of the limo driver turning a... by daveys on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:18:57 PM
my pleasure, my privilege, and my honor, to do wha... by Richard Girard on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:58:34 PM
Mr. Girard, what does this mean to you? I have alw... by Darrin Kellogg on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:02:54 AM
I was a month short of my seventh birthday when th... by Richard Girard on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:49:18 PM
Kill a JFK, get an airport named after you. Shame ... by Your Friend Fairpay on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:45:52 PM
Utter nonsense. The writer is providing revisionis... by Paul May on Thursday, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:36:02 PM
"conspiracy theories" which is where I tend to be ... by Margaret Bassett on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:23:49 AM
Ms. Bassett, my response to Mr. Gerard was simply ... by Paul May on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:33:04 AM
How refreshing this opinion is having been privy t... by David Wrightsman on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:25:53 AM
Well Mr. Wrightsman, like all conspiracy theories ... by Paul May on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:02:44 AM
Richard, it seems to me that the evidence in total... by Darrin Kellogg on Friday, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:44:35 PM
May I ask what evidence you believe indicates Oswa... by Paul May on Saturday, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:07:48 AM
When I suddenly get a comment, completely out of t... by Richard Girard on Saturday, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:29:50 PM
As is typical of the paranoid, anybody doubting a ... by Paul May on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:24:51 PM
First of all, as Fiorello LaGuardia said , when I ... by Richard Girard on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:01:52 PM
May: The shot that exploded Kennedy's head came fr... by Darrin Kellogg on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:51:38 PM
Mr. Kellogg? With all due respect, you know not w... by Paul May on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:36:07 PM
"There is absolutely no physical evidence of a sho... by daveys on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:48:56 PM
It took me a little extra time, but here is the pr... by Richard Girard on Saturday, Mar 13, 2010 at 5:10:01 PM
Mr. Girard you make so many factual errors in your... by Paul May on Sunday, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:19:01 AM
I am now all but convinced that you are not who yo... by Richard Girard on Monday, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:48:46 PM
Either you lie out of habit or research is an alie... by Paul May on Monday, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:34:13 PM
It is Prouty and McKinney, two witnesses to the sa... by Richard Girard on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:26:23 PM
You are now claiming that Colonel Jones lied under... by Paul May on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:29:18 PM
Prouty's boss at the Pentagon was General Edward L... by Paul May on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:38:13 PM
Neither May nor Girand know if he was lying or tel... by Darrin Kellogg on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:09:09 PM
May:1. I did not claim how many shots there were.2... by Darrin Kellogg on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:49:02 PM
23 of 24 forensic pathologists on the Warren Commi... by Paul May on Tuesday, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:03:54 PM
Mr. May, I don't care what you bring up (and I don... by Darrin Kellogg on Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:28:32 AM
...... about accepting the preponderance of the ev... by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:17:15 AM
outside of the stacked with conservative enemies o... by Richard Girard on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:20:34 PM
Kennedy was cold-war warrior and would be consider... by Darrin Kellogg on Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:48:32 AM
So who does the video clearly show killed Kennedy?... by Darrin Kellogg on Wednesday, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:37:48 AM
Everyone should read "Cover Up" by Stewart Galenor... by Nick van Nes on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:15:33 PM
"the real 9/11 perpetrators"? Oh please. Who, pray... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:47:32 AM
The fact that you feel the need to engage in ad ho... by Richard Girard on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:52:13 PM
And is she completely ignorant of the fact that th... by daveys on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:44:30 PM
Mr. Daveys? Do you know your history at all? Do ... by Paul May on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:49:32 PM
The Warren Commission Report and the 9/11 Commissi... by daveys on Wednesday, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:02:06 PM