"...The United States 'had already misread the events by aiding heinous warlords. And they misread it again. They should have taken this as an opportunity to engage the Union of Islamic Courts,' asserts Aynte. 'Because out of the thirteen organizations that formed the [ICU], twelve were Islamic courts, clan courts who had no global jihad or anything. Most of them never left Somalia. These were local guys. Al Shabab was the only threat, that was it. And they could have been somehow controlled.'
"Perhaps. But control of Shabab was not the issue. Control of the ICU was. And since this was not forthcoming, then many, many thousands of innocent people had to be murdered. This is what Washington proceeded to do. The Bush Administration instigated the slaughter; the bipartisan foreign policy establishment gave its approval.
"...The Ethiopians invaded on December 24. It was a classic proxy war coordinated by Washington and staffed by 40,000-50,000 Ethiopian troops. 'The US sponsored the Ethiopian invasion, paying for everything including the gas that it had to expend, to undertake this. And you also had US forces on the ground, US Special Operations forces. You had CIA on the ground. US airpower was a part of the story as well. All of which gave massive military superiority to the Ethiopians,' says Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, director of the Center for the Study of Terrorist Radicalization. ...
"The US-backed Ethiopian forces swiftly overthrew the Islamic Courts Union and sent its leaders fleeing or to the grave. Many were rendered to Ethiopia, Kenya or Djibouti; others were killed by US Special Operations forces or the CIA. ...'If you know the history of Somalia, Ethiopia and Somalia were archenemies, historical enemies, and people felt that this was adding insult to the injury,' says Aynte. 'An insurgency was born out of there.'"
Again, as we have seen constantly, repeatedly throughout this low,
dishonest decade, a policy ostensibly designed to quell extremism and
insurgency instead creates it. Given the clock-like regularity of this
outcome, a cynic might be forgiven for beginning to detect a pattern
that could almost be described as deliberate.
"The Ethiopian invasion was marked by indiscriminate brutality against Somali civilians. Ethiopian and Somali government soldiers secured Mogadishu's neighborhoods by force, raiding houses in search of ICU combatants, looting civilian property and beating or shooting anyone suspected of collaboration with anti-government forces. They positioned snipers on the roofs of buildings and reportedly responded to any attack with disproportionate fire, shelling densely populated areas and several hospitals, according to Human Rights Watch.
"Extrajudicial killings by Ethiopian soldiers were widely reported, particularly in the final months of 2007. Reports of Ethiopian soldiers 'slaughtering' men, women and children 'like goats' -- slitting throats -- were widespread, according to Amnesty International. Both Somali government and Ethiopian forces were accused of horrific sexual violence.
"....If Somalia was already a playground for Islamic militants, the Ethiopian invasion blew open the gates of Mogadishu for Al Qaeda. Within some US counterterrorism circles, the rise of the Shabab in Somalia was predictable and preventable. ...
Predictable. Preventable. Again, the same old pattern. Terrorize
people with your warlords and proxies, your black ops and secret armies --
and you will breed terror in return.
The Death Squads of the Peace Laureate
In
2008, of course, the United States finally had its own "regime change."
The despised and discredited Bush Regime left office, and a fresh-faced
"agent of change" swept into power, riding in on a wave of global
goodwill unprecedented in modern times. Lauded, laureled, he stood at
the center of a transformative moment in history, when, lifted on that
mighty wave, the ship of state could have been turned from the course of
empire and set in a new direction.
That never happened, of
course. It was never going to happen. Obama himself had made clear,
throughout his campaign, that he did not have the slightest interest in
changing the imperial course (as opposed to recalibrating the imperial
PR a bit). And so it has proven -- nowhere more so than in Somalia, as
Scahill notes:
"When President Obama took office in 2009, the United States increased its covert military involvement in and around Somalia, as the CIA and JSOC intensified air and drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen, and began openly hunting people the United States alleged were Al Qaeda leaders. In September of that year, Obama authorized the assassination of Saleh Ali Nabhan, in his administration's first known targeted-killing operation in Somalia. A JSOC team helicoptered into Somalia and gunned down Nabhan. JSOC troops then landed and collected the body.
"By late 2010 the Obama administration unveiled what it referred to as a "dual-track" approach to Somalia wherein Washington would simultaneously deal with the 'central government' in Mogadishu as well as regional and clan players in Somalia. 'The dual track policy only provides a new label for the old (and failed) Bush Administration's approach,' observed Somalia analyst Afyare Abdi Elmi. 'It inadvertently strengthens clan divisions, undermines inclusive and democratic trends and most importantly, creates a conducive environment for the return of the organized chaos or warlordism in the country.'
The dual-track policy encouraged self-declared, clan-based regional administrations to seek recognition and support from the United States. 'Local administrations are popping up every week,' says Aynte. 'Most of them don't control anywhere, but people are announcing local governments in the hopes that CIA will set up a little outpost in their small village.'"
The New York Times had more on Obama's "dual-track approach" in a story over the weekend:
"For the first time in years, the Shabab Islamist group that has long tormented Somalis is receding from several areas at once, including this one, handing the Transitional Federal Government an enormous opportunity to finally step outside the capital and begin uniting this fractious country after two decades of war. Instead, a messy, violent, clannish scramble is emerging over who will take control.
"... Already, clashes have erupted between the anti-Shabab forces fighting for the spoils, and roadblocks operated by clan militias have resurfaced on the streets of Mogadishu, even though the government says it is in control. Many analysts say both the Shabab and the government are splintering and predict that the warfare will only increase, complicating the response to Somalia's widening famine.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).