Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Cult of Holt and More from Nancy Tobi

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 7/18/09

Become a Fan
  (82 fans)
- Advertisement -

So, back to your original question about why everyone can't get behind Holt's bill now. Well, there is a division in the citizens' movement that starts with the Holt Halo effect but then runs much deeper into a real division regarding our goals.

Some people say that "something is better than nothing" and they latch onto the paper record component of Holt's bill, which calls for paper records for touchscreen machines (similar to his original idea) and then also calls for the phasing out of these touchscreens after the next presidential election.

Lots of patriot activists living in states like Maryland, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and elsewhere, would give their eyeteeth to get rid of those machines. So they are lobbying for Holt bill passage.

The problem is that this little paper record teaser in the bill pales in significance when you consider the provisions in the legislation that are so dangerous to the American Republic. Provisions like handing control of our elections to the White House and making concealed vote counting the law of the land.

So my answer is "No. Something is not better than nothing." I mean, if I cut my knee I can certainly ask to have it amputated to eliminate the wound. But is that what I really want in the end?

Didn't we learn anything from the Patriot Act?

Can you elaborate a bit on what you think is so dangerous about this legislation?

There are so many troubling aspects to this bill that I do think of it as the Patriot Act for elections. We are being promised election security at the cost of our democratic freedoms.

- Advertisement -

I can give you a quick and dirty list of the really damaging and dangerous aspects of the bill:

First of all, in complete opposition to his original bill, this new version requires NON-disclosure of election software. It provides trade secret protection to the private corporations and their anonymous employees who are programming the software counting our votes. It completely and historically removes public access to an open vote count.

I hesitate to go on with my list because this #1 issue is so dangerous in and of itself; I want people to really think about what it means. It means government-sanctioned concealed vote counting controlled by private corporations and government insiders to the exclusion of public oversight.

It's a pretty simple concept after all. We've heard the media and politicians complain about this in the Ukraine, in Venezuela, and, lately, in Iran.

I think the main point to remember is that this bill is just an expansion of HAVA, which was already a terrible blow to our democratic elections. It has nothing to do with voting rights, civil rights, or open government.

- Advertisement -

No legislation is better than bad legislation. And Holt's bill is not just bad legislation; it is downright dangerous to the American Republic. I urge all Americans to oppose it.

Thank you for walking us through the Holt Bill, Nancy. Now our readers will understand the clear and present danger the bill presents to our increasingly fragile democracy.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers