Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments

General News

Tea Party Welfare Queens Cry IRS Foul

By       Message William Boardman     Permalink
      (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article as one long page.
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 5/15/13

Author 14586
Become a Fan
  (30 fans)
- Advertisement -

Similarly, the emergence of 527 organizations derived from another Supreme Court decision, Buckley v Valeo (424 US 1) in January 1976, representing the court's pushback against federal election laws passed by Congress to address some of the recent Watergate abuses.  Issued as an anonymous decision "by the court" (with two, opposing dissents), Buckley effectively gave money the same legal standing as speech, complete with First Amendment protection, albeit with some restrictions. 

Citizens United effectively removed those restrictions.   

Who Wouldn't Seek Tax Shelter Under a 501(c )(4) Cover? 

Since 2010, the IRS has faced an unexpected flood of applications for 501(c )(4) status from essentially political organizations of all stripes, but especially from conservative organizations.  It's hard to find anyone who argues that the IRS responded properly or effectively to this exigency, but it's even harder to find anything but execrable reporting on it either, although there is some good work (by Chris Hayes, Lawrence O'Donnell, Jeffrey Toobin, among others). 

Early reporting by AP (Associated Press) May 11 took for story off the rails in the first sentence by claiming that IRS "agents were targeting tea party groups as early as 2011," attributing the claim to a partial draft of a leaked report, and then repeating the claim in the next sentence.  The New York Time story the same day started with a misleading reference to "overzealous audits." 

The story got so distorted and detached from reality that even the President in his May 13 remarks didn't have much of a handle on it.  

Among the accumulating ironies here is that this is the same AP that so agitated the Obama administration that the Justice Department felt justified in carrying out a wholesale trashing of AP's First Amendment rights. But that was apparently because AP got another leak-based story right. 

It's Not As Though the Reality of 501(c )(4) Scams Was A Surprise 

- Advertisement -

The first step toward understanding this IRS story is to realize that the problem of 501(c )(4) organizations carrying out political activity that should be illegal is a real problem and is widely recognized. 

Senators Carl Levin, D-Mich, and John McCain, R-Ariz, who co-chair an IRS oversight committee released a statement on May 13, saying in part: 

"The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has been for several months examining on a bipartisan basis whether the IRS has adequately enforced rules regarding the extent to which tax exempt nonprofit 501(c)(4) groups engage in partisan politics. [emphasis added] 

 

"We had tentatively planned a hearing on that issue for June. After Friday's announcement that the IRS, to the extent it has been enforcing the law, may have done so in ways that singled out some groups for special scrutiny, we have determined that the subcommittee should investigate that additional issue as well. As a result, we have decided to delay our hearing in order to examine this issue carefully". " 

- Advertisement -

In other words, the subcommittee's concern was lax IRS enforcement against a perceived abuse of the tax code, and this concern is reality-based, even though McCain is quoted as talking about "audits" of tea party groups -- which is not part of the reality of this issue. 

Reality May Never Catch Up with Political Straw Men 

There were no audits.  There was an evolving and almost comically ineffectual effort by the IRS to sort out 501(c)(4) applications to reduce the number of political organizations seeking tax shelter as "social welfare" organizations. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?