Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments

Life Arts

Tamed

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 2 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Valuable 4   Must Read 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 11/19/12

Become a Fan
  (31 fans)

All that came as a shock. I knew that we are seriously reducing biodiversity now, but I didn't realize we have done that for so long. Nor did I know that it was Europeans, white people, who started it so many centuries ago. And our aggressive destruction of the earth continues with bigger more powerful machines. Cutting at least half of the tropical forest of the very large island of Borneo in order to plant thousands of square miles in oil palms. Mono culture on a scale never before done. Digging for oil always spills oil into rivers that then poison life, including human life. Blowing up the top of mountains in order to get to coal is as destructive.

I had not realized that extinction goes back centuries, albeit for different reasons. Then, we killed because we could; now because we have powerful machines who destroy more thoroughly. The author of Green History doss not mention human population crashes as a consequence of the diseases we brought with us when we, Europeans, "discovered" the rest of the world.. He does have pages and pages of yet another interference with ecologies: the import of plant and animal species that were considered beautiful, exotic, attractive. All of it meddling in a planetary ecology we never considered, knew nothing about; we still don't.

How did my grandparents, and their parents, think about the earth? Very obviously they thought of the planet as something they owned and could shape as they saw fit. Today we continue this grand illusion with the latest refinements. We have learned how to change the DNA of plants and animals. We "genetically manipulate" and then get a patent on a plant the company then "owns." Of course nature immediately sees to it that the pest the GMO plant is made to repel, evolves so that it can now eat the GMO plant. Which makes Monsanto do some more hocus pocus, gets a patent on a new and improved species they now also own.

Games people play.

But playing games with nature, our food and only home, is not only foolish but has lethal consequences.

The kind of intense, totally unequal violence we have sunk to at present was unknown even half a century ago. Wars fought for oil. Many square miles of landscape denuded or blown up to get at coal, diamonds, gold. The overwhelming power of a nation, flying an airplane flown by a computer controlled a few thousand miles away, to kill one man (and the innocents who happen to be in his neighborhood). We are doing what was unthinkable not long ago. Yes, indeed we have changed.

I have spent half my life thinking about why we changed. After studying and reading for many years I see three possible explanations.

One is that in the very last thousand years of the 150,000 years of our existence we have immensely increased our number at the same time that we increased our consumption not only of food but of all the resources of the earth that we need for an ever more elaborate and expensive life style.

Fifty years ago I attended a yearly meeting of the AAAS (American Associ- ation for the Advancement of Science) where a gifted psychologist, John B. Calhoun, presented an elaborate study of populations. Many scientists experiment with mice that have a shorter life span than humans to make generalizations about humans. His study showed that mice definitely have a culture, a society, that with increasing population density makes individuals more violent, acting un-mouselike, and then always resulting in a population crash. Pandemics also are known to have caused intense behavior changes, violence and then a population crash.

More than half of all seven billion humans now alive live in cities, often in incredibly compressed spaces. in barracks (apartment buildings) or in towers: a thousand people living on top of each other, or in slum cities where a dwelling is 6 X 8 feet or less. However, from what I have read and seen on Youtube the people of those illegal cities are, and have to be, creative, cooperative, and astonishingly non-violent. So perhaps Calhoun's hypothesis that rapid population growth leads to violence, unusual behavior, ultimately population crash, is not the whole truth. Some of the scientists who have studied those compressed cities propose that those people are the future: living almost without money, a minimum of power (electricity). they have to be and are extraordinarily inventive.

A second explanation of why we changed was briefly the subject of science fiction writing in the 80s of the 20 th century. The supposition that human "stock" was experimented on by extra-terrestrial powers. Doing to humans what we now call genetic manipulation. Shikasta, by Doris Lessing, - 1979 comes to mind. Quite a few other books. One of those ideas that may be possible but not provable

The third possibility is what I now think the most likely. My contact with what I prefer to think of as First People impressed me greatly; they changed my life. There was a simple purity about them that from the first made me think that is how all of us were. After the two years when I had an opportu- nity to get to know them I read what others had written about First People in other parts of the world. Probably the first author I read was Laurens van der Post, South African writer, a generation before mine. He wrote three books about who he calls the Bushman of the Kalahari Desert. In one of them he writes that if a Bushman lands in jail he dies; sometimes the first night. Doctors could never determine a "cause of death." Van der Post writes that is because the Bushman is untamed.

By implication that means we are tamed humans.

First people are "wild" humans. Wild in the sense that nature is wild -- not in our modern use of the word wild as crazy, unmanageable. Living in the wild--a desert, a jungle, snow and ice, a tiny island--requires an intimate familiarity of that wild. And a constant awareness in that wild. A small little girl once held me by the hand when we went to join the others of her group. Every now and then she would stop me for a minute, or walked around some invisible danger. She could not explain why, other than that it was necessary. An adult later explained that she and everyone else learned early to be aware of animals, who they were, what intentions they had. When she led me around an invisible something she probably knew to keep a certain distance from an animal. When she stopped for a minute she gave an animal the chance to get away. To be forced into a small concrete space, totally unfamiliar, is ruthlessly being taken out of a known reality. A wild human cannot live in a human-designed world. Tamed humans could not survive in the wild.

Taming is controlling. Dogs are bred to be man's best friend but here in Hawaii "everyone knows" that if you tie a dog to a very short leash, witout human contact other than being thrown a bone or some food. the dog gets dangerous. What the military call discipline is the same short leash taming. Humans have to be taught to kill other humans. We are tamed, conditioned, to live in our human world, a world completely incapsulated within the larger reality of the planet.

The more I think of that the better it fits. Our entire growing up, our education, our monstrously extended system of laws and regulations, all are ways to tame us and at all cost to keep us tamed. Europeans, white people, who were the first to be tamed still seem to think that all other kinds and colors of humans need some extra taming. And if they cannot, or do not want to, be tamed there is always prison; yet another of our proud inven- tions.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

robert wolff lives on the Big Island, called Hawai'i
his website is wildwolff.com

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Have We Lost Our Humanity?

BE PREPARED

Strange, very strange, dangerously strange

Is there an alternative to constant economic growth?

Money - and why we must learn to do without

How we see others, how they see us

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

  I really love the unique way that this ar... by Theresa Paulfranz on Monday, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:51:16 PM
Nice piece.   I wouldn't use the word, 'tam... by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:26:49 AM
reply to Theresa Paulfranz:   I'm not big o... by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:44:40 AM
There are quite a few post-Apocalyps movements lik... by robert wolff on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:28:48 AM
""if the world used only a little less oil,... by Mark Goldes on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:02:38 PM
Many of the concepts I agree with.  The most ... by Doc McCoy on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:54:20 PM
O course "Old codger McCoy" is right. We need to s... by robert wolff on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:00:02 AM