Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 11/17/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (10 comments)

TAX CUTS: THEOLOGY, FACTS & TOTALLY F**KED

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (6 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com


2. REAGAN
From Franklin Roosevelt's second term all the way through to Jimmy Carter, - from 1936 until 1982 - the top rate was in the 70-92% range.
Then along came Reagan in 1981. In 1982 he cut that down to 50%.
The economy went into "the worst recession since the Great Depression."
His supporters argued that it was all Carter's fault and that the new policies would take time to work. The tax cuts stayed in place. In 1987, there was another round of tax cuts. They took the top rate down to 38.5%. It would stimulate the economy!
There was a boom. But it was a bubble.
Then, in October, 1987, there was a crash. The worst since '29. It was called Black Monday.
Much of the bubble money had gone into – ohmigod! –real estate.

Suddenly there were bank failures! More than during the Great Depression. There was a Savings & Loans crisis! There had to be a bailout.


3. BUSH II
George Bush came into office with the healthiest, post powerful economy in American history.
He immediately cut taxes. The top marginal rate went down from 39% to 35%. He also cut capital gains taxes and inheritance taxes. A recession immediately ensued. But he persisted.
Eventually, the economy began to grow.
Employment didn't grow very much. Median income went down. The stock market was pretty flat. But the financial sector – and only the sector – grew.

Which should have made it obvious to someone, that it was ... a bubble.
There was a crash.
Bank failures. A bailout.


The three worst economic disasters in American history follow the exact, same pattern. Tax cuts, boom, bubble, crash.


HIGH TAXES CORRELATE WITH ECONOMIC GROWTH



The four period of greatest economic growth in American history, by pretty much any measure, are:
· World War II (1941-45): top tax rate varied from 88-94%

· Post-war under Truman and Eisenhower: top rate bounced around from 81-92%

· Clinton years: Clinton raised Bush's top rate of 31% to 37% and then to 39%

· First two Roosevelt Administrations (1933-40). When Roosevelt came into office, Hoover had already raised the tax rate in 1932 from 25% to 63%. Roosevelt raised it again in 1936 to 79%.


A lot of ink, sweat, and ranting has gone into proving that the New Deal did not end the Great Depression. Nonetheless, the economy grew 58% from the time Roosevelt came into office and when the US entered the war.

Some of that anti-New Deal rhetoric also claims that the recovery began under Hoover. Perhaps, but to say so, is also to say that it began with tax hikes.

Likewise, many right wing critics insist that the Clinton boom actually started under Bush the First. It is necessary to remember that Bush the First also raised taxes (from 28% to 31%) and was soundly thrashed by the conservative for doing so. Stephen Moore, of the Cato Institute, called it "The Crime of the Century," and explained, at length how it had brought ruin to America.


TAX INCREASES ARE FOLLOWED BY ECONOMIC GROWTH


Three of the four high growth periods cited above followed significant tax hikes.
The fourth, the Truman-Eisenhower years, began with a top tax rate of top rate of 91% and it couldn't get much higher.


MODERATE TAX CUTS ARE FOLLOWED BY A FLAT ECONOMY

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

http://www.larrybeinhart.com

LARRY BEINHART is the author of SALVATION BOULEVARD, soon to be released as a major motion picture with Pierce Brosnan, Greg Kinnear, Jennifer Connelly, Marissa Tomei, Ed Harris, and Jim Gaffigan, WAG THE DOG, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Silly title by Ivan Hentschel on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:29:54 AM
Belief by Richmond Shreve on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:11:16 AM
The human condition by Ivan Hentschel on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:09:43 PM
WHAT'S MISSING FROM THE EQUATION? by WML on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:07:11 PM
Very interesting by virginius "gin" arnold on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:33:59 PM
Marx Volume 3 - no calculus by Andrey Gerasimenko on Tuesday, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:47:49 AM
Tax cuts, etc. by im4unity on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:34:05 PM
Excellent Title! by Maxwell on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:20:56 PM
One objection to the title by Maxwell on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:22:55 PM
Human nature, corruptibility and trust by Joseph Reilly on Monday, Nov 17, 2008 at 6:42:11 PM