Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 46 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 9/16/11

Super Congress in Session - More of the Cruel Charade

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments

Michael Collins
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

The jaundiced view assumes a ringer among the Democrats, someone who will give in to heavy cuts in Social Security and Medicare. While Senator Baucus shows strong support for banking and corporate interests and might be pegged as the cross over vote, he strongly opposed cuts to Social Security and Medicare suggested by Obama's deficit reduction commission chairs (see December 2, 2010).

A better method of analysis involves looking at the crucial votes by members, the votes that got us into trouble with the federal debt.

The Iraq war and the Wall Street bailouts are the twin pillars of our current troubles. According to figures from the 2012 US Budget (Office of Management and Budget), the total cost of the Iraq was through 2010 was $6.1 trillion (see graph here).  Imagine the impact of $6.1 trillion worth of support for Social Security and Medicare, repairing infrastructure, and deficit reduction.

The cost of the bailouts is still being racked up. The SourceWatch Wall Street Bailout table shows that $4.7 trillion disbursed, $3.2 trillion was repaid, and $1.5 trillion is still outstanding.

Support of The Money Party agenda of endless war and bailouts for the wealthiest institutions and individuals represents the essence of our budget troubles. Liberal and conservative voting records are meaningless unless those voting are graded on their efforts against the wholesale looting of the US Treasury.

The real rating scale for members of the Super Congress committee is their record on the Iraq War authorization and the 2008 bailout that created a river of cash for Wall Street. Eight members were in lock step support of the Iraq War and the bailouts. Two opposed the Iraq war very early, Murray and Van Hollen. Hensarling, the Texas Republican, voted against both bailout bills in the House. Becerra was at zero for The Money Party opposing both the war and both House bailout bills (See voting record chart).

The committee members are ten to two in favor of bailouts and nine to three in favor of Iraq. Why should we expect anything to come out of this process other than a reaffirmation of the status quo?  War and bailouts (corporate subsidies) will be left alone. It's a stacked deck. These legislators delivered before, they'll deliver again. They know who they work for. The best we can hope for is a deadlock and no action.

Here is a solution

The Super Congress committee is tasked with reducing the national debt by $1.5 trillion over ten years.  The Wall Street crowd owes Treasury and the Federal Reserve $1.5 trillion for the bailout (Appendix I).  Give them three years to pay it back.  Conduct a comprehensive audit of supposed repayments to date and add any shortages.  Apply that amount to the deficit and there is no need for a Super Congress to denigrate democracy, harm citizens, and engage in revolting histrionics on Capitol Hill.  The ten year goal of $1.5 trillion would be taken care of in three years with no threat to Social Security and Medicare.

This type of solution explains why Congress and the White House created the tightly structured Super Congress in the first place.  It's The Money Party protection racket in full swing.  Set up a needless goal, bar any discussion of real solutions, and make the public pay for it.  Same as it ever was"

END

This article may be reproduced with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

The Money Party RSS

Appendix I

Bailout recipients owe the US Treasury about $0.5 trillion and the Federal Reserve another $1.0 trillion.  That money should go directly to the deficit reduction, eliminating the charade of the Super Congress.  The Fed put out $4.0 trillion to save Wall Street and the big banks. It has nearly $3.0 trillion of assets.  It can afford this with the right structure or the system can just consider it a franchise fee.  If the Fed can't handle it, Congress can legislate it out of existence and create a Bank of the United States or a network of 50 state banks with a limited Fed for the money supply.  The assets of a truly national bank would make it viable instantaneously.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 4   Supported 3   Valuable 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend