Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 7/13/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (18 comments)

Should a News Organization Be "Partisan" When One Party Represents Falsehood?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com


It's not all debates that NPR wishes not to take sides on, but only
those between our major political parties and the sizeable portions of
the American public they bring into alignment with their declared
positions.


It's understandable, to me, that this would place a major news
organization --particularly one like NPR that is partially funded with
public money, and is not privately owned-- in a dilemma.


But it seems deplorable if all it takes to get NPR to become "neutral"
is for one of our political parties to declare that "Black is White,
and Up is Down."


Nor does it seem that "show" don't "tell" suffices to solve the
problem. It is true that a "showing" of how American courts and
treaties have considered this issue settled, until the Bushites
declared that "black is white," would enable the listener to understand
what has happened, and that Bush's declaration "We do not torture" was
false. But it does not really suffice as a solution because this
history cannot be recapitulated every time the issue of waterboarding
comes up.


Nor can people be trusted to understand the truth of the matter just by
describing the procedure. The judgments of history on
waterboarding represent experience and knowledge that individuals
simply cannot be expected to match. Recall the recent case of the
conservative talk radio guy who submitted himself to waterboarding,
convinced that it was NOT torture, only to be stunned and traumatized
by the experience and to declare that it "absolutely" WAS torture.


So NPR truly does have a dilemma, and no easy solutions available to
it. It can stick with "white is white," even if a powerful
political party says otherwise. Or it can be "neutral," because
the lies of that political party mean there is no "clear consensus" on
the issue (as that Mr. Duffy of NPR blandly and flabbily states).



The trouble is, this "neutrality" isn't really all that neutral.
It DOES lend legitimacy to the side with an illegitimate
position.


It seems that "mainstream" news organizations --and by "mainstream" I
mean those who wish to appear to everyone not to be aligned with one
major party against another-- are indeed put into a difficult spot if,
as has happened lately, one of our political parties becomes dominated
by the lie, and its followers are easily persuaded by those lies.


Perhaps the solution would be for NPR to say, "waterboarding, which the
Bush administration declares is not torture but the rest of the world
says is torture." That would be a way of just "reporting" without
"taking sides."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Andy Schmookler is running for Congress in Virginia's 6th District.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Neutrality is impossible by Don Smith on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:06:45 AM
News reporting, by joanakelly on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:40:42 PM
Tweet: Check out "Should a News Organization Be "Partisan" When One Party Represents Falsehood?" at http://www.robkall.com/a/93613 by Burton Smith on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:21:07 PM
You have to created a valid link, by GL Rowsey on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:10:10 AM
...if one party represents falsehoods? by Josh Mitteldorf on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:25:26 PM
NPR's pathological need to balance "right" with "wrong". by Richard Lee on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:16:50 PM
It is all based on an opinion by Gallaher on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:19:57 PM
opinion? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:54:03 PM
ABS. by GL Rowsey on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:05:58 AM
No, the Constitution defines two things that negate your arg by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:01:52 AM
You don't read for comprehension, by GL Rowsey on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:05:07 AM
um so which half of The Duopoly are you condemning???? by Ben Marble, M.D. on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:51:59 AM
? by Andrew Bard Schmookler on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:05:21 AM
I agree with Andy by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:55:37 AM
Editorial bias is to be desired,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:48:07 AM
Further,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:23:23 AM
Exactly by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:08:13 AM
and in Pittsburgh by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:16:16 PM