Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Scanners - The Prequel

      (Page 2 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 5   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 11/18/10

Author 3863
Become a Fan
  (122 fans)
- Advertisement -

We do know that the bomber's father, Umaru Mutellab, one Africa's wealthiest individuals, told U.S. intelligence authorities that his son was a terrorist a month before the bombing.  We also know that Abdulmutallab's name was placed in a terrorism database a month before the Christmas flight.  However, his name was not transferred from that database to a watch list of 14,000 essentially nominated for the no-fly database, nor was the name transferred to the 4,000 member official no-fly list.

In the furor over the event, a clear voice emerged with a solution to future problems like that presented by the underwear bomber.  Michael Chertoff, long time Bush national security official offered these unqualified assertions on December 27 in the Washington Post and December 28 in the New York Times:

"This plot is an example of something we've known could exist in theory, and in order to be able to detect it, you've got to find some way of detecting things in parts of the body that aren't easy to get at," Chertoff said. "It's either pat-downs or imaging, or otherwise hoping that bad guys haven't figured it out, and I guess bad guys have figured it out."  Washington Post, Dec 27

"In recent days, Kip Hawley, the former T.S.A. director, and Michael Chertoff, the former homeland security secretary, have called for the rapid installation of a new generation of whole-body scanners that can look underneath clothing to search for hidden weapons or explosives, which officials consider the single most significant aviation threat today..."  New York Times, Dec. 28, 2009

From that point forward, the focus on preventing future terror threats to air travel focused on full body scanners.  On January 15, 2010, the New York Times appended the December 28,, 2009 article with this statement:

"Articles on Dec. 28, 29 and 30, about the apparent bombing attempt on a flight to Detroit, discussed the use of full-body scanners for airport security. They cited Michael Chertoff, the former secretary of homeland security, as supporting wider use of the scanners. Mr. Chertoff has confirmed in several recent interviews that a manufacturer of the devices is a client of his consulting company. That connection should have been noted in the articles."  Editors Note, January 15

Chertoff was caught red handed shilling for full body scanners in behalf of a company that was a client of Chertoff's consulting company.  He was busted in public by the New York Times editor.

What was the outcome?  Chertoff's original, self-interested assertion prevailed.  We have full body scans headed for 1,000 airports and, for those who don't want the radiation, the national security grope, invasive searches of the passenger's genital area.

- Advertisement -

Never mind the first hand eye witness accounts by Kurt and Lori Haskell.  Never mind the report by one of the most prominent public figures in Nigeria, the bombers father, that his son was a terrorist and the lack of decisive action on that tip off.  Never mind the never released 200 hours of Dutch security footage that could have proven without a doubt the existence of a facilitator, the sharp dressed man who accompanies the bomber.

All of this reveals a systemic defect in anti-terrorism activities, one that, if corrected, could have more efficiently and effectively prevented future terror threats everywhere by logical changes in policies and practices.  Instead of decisive action on this clearly documented problem, we now have full body scanners proposed by a Bush era security official with a clear conflict of interest.

Perpetual 9/11

The underwear bomber incident is, in some ways, 9/11 writ small.  A credibly identified terrorist is allowed to board U.S. commercial airliner with little scrutiny.  There is a tragic outcome.  Clear breakdowns in security are exposed, breakdowns that make no real sense to citizens - failure to put Abdulmutallab on the no-fly list, for example.  Congress and others fail to truly examine any of this, while the public is whipped into a fury.  Instead of a real solution, a serious, unflinching investigation into who was responsible and why crazy policies are in place that appear to coddle identified threats, we end up with a solution that makes little, if any sense - full body scanners.

Full body scanners share a common trait with the misdirected solutions to avoid a future 9/11 - the Patriot Act, illegal wiretapping, suspension of habeas corpus, torture, etc.  The scanners represent a major intrusion into our lives, a violation of our rights, a likely health hazard, and a major diversion from the real issue at hand - incompetence and/or deception in the handling of identified threats to the nation, individuals who somehow  bypass the very security protections put in place to stop their attacks.

- Advertisement -


Also see:
"Conspiracy or co*k up?" White House reaction to ersatz bomber Michael Collins, Jan 8
"The Big Con" - Taliban About to Defeat Pakistan, Take Control of Nukes, and It's Another 9/11 Michael Collins, May 11, 2009

This article may be reproduced in part or in whole with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

Next Page  1  |  2

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Let each man and each woman choose what 'they do b... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:08:51 AM
What type of civilization tolerates their governme... by Michael Collins on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:13:22 AM
Michael, I've only flown in an actual jet once, an... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:53:13 AM
Does...Not...ComputeThanks for the Lost In Space r... by NettieMae on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:57:37 AM
I used to come from school and watch that show. It... by Ned Lud on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:18:59 AM
...quite effectively, in fact. That's why flight ... by Joy Sabl on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:41:05 PM
The bottom line is this: every day we give up a l... by Judy Palmer on Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:55:51 PM
How come nobody is reminding us that 9/11 was an i... by Frank Legge on Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:53:24 AM
The "underpants" bomber was not able to blow himse... by R.A. on Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:39:22 AM
They are all setups to justify this egregious beha... by Dave Kisor on Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:51:28 PM